• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Balanced Brawl Public Preview *GENESIS UPDATE*

Status
Not open for further replies.

kupo15

Smash Hero
Joined
Mar 14, 2008
Messages
7,002
Location
Playing Melee
Yea that was a bad idea. Would be just as bad as the nightly builds thread

That would create even more clutter. One person could be talking about Brawl+ Mario while someone else could argue against that guy, not knowing he was talking about Brawl+ Mario and argue with him about BBrawl Mario thinking that's who he is talking about. Oh, look at that, it's already confusing and I just described the situation. You know that's a terrible idea, just like it was to put your code set in the Weekly Build Thread... (when you still updated it) sure, not much discussion there, but when there was it got in the way a lot of the time (to be completely honest with you).
Thanks SMk for making that PERFECTLY clear because I didn't pick up on the 3 responses before yours that said the same ****ing thing. I know you hate me but flaming is completely unnecessary but whatever.
 

zxeon

Smash Lord
Joined
Apr 11, 2006
Messages
1,476
Location
Indianapolis, Indiana
Why isn't this stickied yet?

B+ gets character discussion. I foresee bBrawl needing it in the future as well.

I'm playing this now. B+, you were great to me, but now I'm back to playing actual Brawl without the stupid ****.

EDIT: Mario's Dtilt doesn't need more damage. It needs less lag for it to actually be usable. Giving Mario's dtilt more damage is a waste of a buff.
Shouldn't it be called Brawl+ Lite since it borrows so generously from Brawl+? When you think about it Balanced Brawl is just a variation of Brawl+ since they are based on the exact same codes.

It doesn't really need it's own forums since it's just another variation of B+ codes there have been many Kupo's, MuBa's, and Mookierah's none of those got a forum because there were not enough people following it.
 

5ive

Smash Champion
Joined
Mar 13, 2008
Messages
2,008
Location
USA USA USA
Shouldn't it be called Brawl+ Lite since it borrows so generously from Brawl+? When you think about it Balanced Brawl is just a variation of Brawl+ since they are based on the exact same codes.

It doesn't really need it's own forums since it's just another variation of B+ codes there have been many Kupo's, MuBa's, and Mookierah's none of those got a forum because there were not enough people following it.
Oh no D=; another ignorant post. Watch what you say. Something like this can start flame wars. The fact that Brawl+ stemmed from a different vision should say something to you. Brawl+ is a project trying to make Brawl a true successor of the previous smash games. Because of this, the project changed Brawl's physics to make it a faster paced, more offensive game.

Balanced Brawl is well... balancing Brawl while keeping to Brawl's true physics. I basically still plays like vBrawl. So no, it isn't a variation of Brawl+. Both are variations of vBrawl, but take totally different views.
 

zxeon

Smash Lord
Joined
Apr 11, 2006
Messages
1,476
Location
Indianapolis, Indiana
Oh no D=; another ignorant post. Watch what you say. Something like this can start flame wars. The fact that Brawl+ stemmed from a different vision should say something to you. Brawl+ is a project trying to make Brawl a true successor of the previous smash games. Because of this, the project changed Brawl's physics to make it a faster paced, more offensive game.

Balanced Brawl is well... balancing Brawl while keeping to Brawl's true physics. I basically still plays like vBrawl. So no, it isn't a variation of Brawl+. Both are variations of vBrawl, but take totally different views.
But this is Brawl+ the whole point of Brawl+ is to use the codes how you see fit, and I know very well what I am saying you don't need to tell me to be cautious.

This is another branch of Brawl+ just like all the code sets that came and went before it. I'd like to see the rationale that says otherwise.
 

Linkshot

Smash Hero
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
5,236
Location
Hermit in the Highrise
Regarding Samus, her best GTFO move is definitely Screw Attack out of shield. My suggestion is more BKB on the final hit.

EDIT: Don't feed the troll.
 

Thinkaman

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Aug 26, 2007
Messages
6,535
Location
Madison, WI
NNID
Thinkaman
3DS FC
1504-5749-3616
Shouldn't it be called Brawl+ Lite since it borrows so generously from Brawl+? When you think about it Balanced Brawl is just a variation of Brawl+ since they are based on the exact same codes.
I'm sorry, I don't think we've been properly introduced.

Who are you?
 

GHNeko

Sega Stockholm Syndrome.
Joined
Aug 13, 2007
Messages
20,009
Location
テキサス、アメリカ
NNID
GHNeko

zxeon

Smash Lord
Joined
Apr 11, 2006
Messages
1,476
Location
Indianapolis, Indiana
I am zxeon, all in lowercase if you please. Formerly Cerozero. Twenty-One years of age and a long standing follower of Brawl and all of it's code based alterations. On bad days I can be quite abrasive I apologized for that.

Pleased to make your acquaintance.

PS: I post in this lime green.
 

Pierce7d

Wise Hermit
Joined
Dec 20, 2006
Messages
6,289
Location
Teaneck, North Bergen County, NJ, USA
3DS FC
1993-9028-0439
Shouldn't it be called Brawl+ Lite since it borrows so generously from Brawl+? When you think about it Balanced Brawl is just a variation of Brawl+ since they are based on the exact same codes.

It doesn't really need it's own forums since it's just another variation of B+ codes there have been many Kupo's, MuBa's, and Mookierah's none of those got a forum because there were not enough people following it.

I am zxeon, all in lowercase if you please. Formerly Cerozero. Twenty-One years of age and a long standing follower of Brawl and all of it's code based alterations. On bad days I can be quite abrasive I apologized for that.

Pleased to make your acquaintance.

PS: I post in this lime green.
Well at any rate, there is a pretty distinctive different between bBrawl and Brawl+ in terms of both aims, build, and gameplay. While they share some similarities, it's only to be expected as all versions of Brawl, modified or pure, share similarities. Everyone else in the board seems to have noticed the difference between the two, and recognize the need to acknowledge them by different nomenclature. Seeing as you don't seem particularly dull, and in fact rather on the bright side, I'd appreciate it if you dropped the rather pointless argument pertaining to whether or not this is Brawl+, because for all intentional and referral purposes, it clearly is not.

Thank you sir, have a nice day.

PS: I love green!
 

Anomilus

Smash Lord
Joined
Jan 30, 2004
Messages
1,221
Location
The space between genius and madness
NNID
Hyperdon
So anybody up for some games? Any match-ups that don't involve me using ZSS, Olimar, or T-Link can be examined as I can decently use almost any character. Of course I do have some characters I use much better than others, but still...

??? :D?

EDIT - Currently gonna play another person, so don't reply to this!
 

Eyada

Smash Apprentice
Joined
Mar 11, 2008
Messages
186
Location
Utah
Amazing Ampharos said:
Future, final releases will be executable on unhacked Wiis.
My apologies if I come across as obtuse for needing to ask about it, but is this actually possible?
 

Plum

Has never eaten a plum.
Premium
Joined
Jun 28, 2008
Messages
3,458
Location
Rochester, NY
My apologies if I come across as obtuse for needing to ask about it, but is this actually possible?
Very much possible.

Bannerbomb can load homebrew applications without actually installing anything. The problem right now is that Bannerbomb can't correctly run GeckoOS; it will load up GeckoOS but as soon as you try to launch a game it comes up with an error.

That's why for now you need to use Bannerbomb to first install the Homebrew Channel, and then run GeckoOS.

It's just a matter of time type of thing until Bannerbomb will correctly run GeckoOS (or a new exploit will be found before that happens that allows GeckoOS to run).
 

Eldiran

Smash Lord
Joined
Jan 8, 2008
Messages
1,707
Location
Pennsylvania
They are the same thing. These guys are just dressing it up in different clothes and acting like it's something new.
Quit trolling. Brawl hacks and codes were not devised specifically for Brawl+. Brawl+ does not own these codes any more than you or I own the internet just because we both use the internet to do things. If you've been on the internet longer than I have, that does not mean I am just you dressed up in different clothes. /weird analogy

I could understand your indignation if the creators of BBrawl claimed it was superior to Brawl+, or that they were the first to do this, but they have not made any such claims. Using the same codes as a basis does not constitute mimicry or theft, and if it did it would be theft from the code creators, not from Brawl+.
 

Pierce7d

Wise Hermit
Joined
Dec 20, 2006
Messages
6,289
Location
Teaneck, North Bergen County, NJ, USA
3DS FC
1993-9028-0439
Quit trolling. Brawl hacks and codes were not devised specifically for Brawl+. Brawl+ does not own these codes any more than you or I own the internet just because we both use the internet to do things. If you've been on the internet longer than I have, that does not mean I am just you dressed up in different clothes. /weird analogy

I could understand your indignation if the creators of BBrawl claimed it was superior to Brawl+, or that they were the first to do this, but they have not made any such claims. Using the same codes as a basis does not constitute mimicry or theft, and if it did it would be theft from the code creators, not from Brawl+.
Just ignore him. I spoke to him in quite an obvious, explanatory, and intellectual manner, but it seems that he was unable to understand. Such is the problem with trolls. Oh well, let's not feed him
 

cobaltblue

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Messages
455
Shouldn't it be called Brawl+ Lite since it borrows so generously from Brawl+? When you think about it Balanced Brawl is just a variation of Brawl+ since they are based on the exact same codes.

It doesn't really need it's own forums since it's just another variation of B+ codes there have been many Kupo's, MuBa's, and Mookierah's none of those got a forum because there were not enough people following it.
Why invent the wheel twice if the original code creators are credited properly?
 

zxeon

Smash Lord
Joined
Apr 11, 2006
Messages
1,476
Location
Indianapolis, Indiana
Yes they were. A few of those were made exclusively for Brawl+.

Who else is gonna use (just to name a few) the hitbox property modifier, frame speed mod, hitlag modifier or hitstun modifier? The use of these codes are far too complex to be used "just for fun" and were made by people who had Brawl+ in mind.

I don't think you know what you're talking about.
.
 

Eyada

Smash Apprentice
Joined
Mar 11, 2008
Messages
186
Location
Utah
Very much possible.

Bannerbomb can load homebrew applications without actually installing anything. The problem right now is that Bannerbomb can't correctly run GeckoOS; it will load up GeckoOS but as soon as you try to launch a game it comes up with an error.

That's why for now you need to use Bannerbomb to first install the Homebrew Channel, and then run GeckoOS.

It's just a matter of time type of thing until Bannerbomb will correctly run GeckoOS (or a new exploit will be found before that happens that allows GeckoOS to run).
I see. Thank you for the quick and thorough response; I really should take the time to learn this stuff so I don't need to bother others to explain it to me.

With the ability to run BBrawl on unhacked Wiis, perhaps it isn't quite as far-fetched to imagine it becoming a tournament standard. (Or, in an ideal world, the tournament standard.)
 

betterthanbonds9

Smash Ace
Joined
Feb 13, 2008
Messages
744
Location
In eighteenspikes' heart
Yes they were. A few of those were made exclusively for Brawl+.
and the internet was made for the army, but I'm not in the army <_<

Who else is gonna use (just to name a few) the hitbox property modifier, frame speed mod, hitlag modifier or hitstun modifier? The use of these codes are far too complex to be used "just for fun" and were made by people who had Brawl+ in mind.

I don't think you know what you're talking about.
I don't view bBrawl as a "just for fun" thing...<_<

frankly, it seems well thought-out, something that I wouldn't attribute to a "just for fun" hobby

I like the green, it's strangely readable but still vibrant, but frankly you're just trolling, please have constructive criticism of the project and not "this is brawl+" when merely looking at what codes are used can tell you that bBrawl is not about changing the engine of brawl.

...........please? :colorful:
 

zxeon

Smash Lord
Joined
Apr 11, 2006
Messages
1,476
Location
Indianapolis, Indiana
and the internet was made for the army, but I'm not in the army <_<

[/COLOR]I don't view bBrawl as a "just for fun" thing...<_<

frankly, it seems well thought-out, something that I wouldn't attribute to a "just for fun" hobby

I like the green, it's strangely readable but still vibrant, but frankly you're just trolling, please have constructive criticism of the project and not "this is brawl+" when merely looking at what codes are used can tell you that bBrawl is not about changing the engine of brawl.

...........please? :colorful:
That's not what I meant. I was talking about codes to turn superscope shots into freezies and stuff.

This is just another arrangement of Brawl+. Just come to terms with it. It fits the definition exactly.
 

CloneHat

Smash Champion
Joined
Jan 18, 2009
Messages
2,130
Location
Montreal, Quebec
That's not what I meant. I was talking about codes to turn superscope shots into freezies and stuff.

This is just another arrangement of Brawl+. Just come to terms with it. It fits the definition exactly.
It definitely falls neatly under the many "branch codesets" using the same codes for different purposes.

However, they're perfectly allowed to make they're own codeset, even though they were originally created for Brawl+.

It is not "something new" but it is not thievery, either.
 

Linkshot

Smash Hero
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
5,236
Location
Hermit in the Highrise
These codes are not "Brawl+". They are just "codes". Brawl+ uses them, and now BBrawl is going to use them.

And I liked the analogy up there.

Don't feed the troll; save it for the homeless!
 

GHNeko

Sega Stockholm Syndrome.
Joined
Aug 13, 2007
Messages
20,009
Location
テキサス、アメリカ
NNID
GHNeko
There is a difference between having something made for something and having something made only for something.

There were codes made specifically for Brawl+, just as the Workshop Character subforum was made specifically for Brawl+, BUT that doesn't mean they are only for Brawl+ or that they have to say that.

There's a difference. :/
 

GwJ

Smash Hero
Joined
Nov 1, 2008
Messages
5,833
Location
Pennsylvania
NNID
Baghul
Grape Juice and Wine. Maybe of the same general thing except with some twists here and there, but taste very different. Now get out troll.
 

Rykoshet

Smash Champion
Joined
Mar 1, 2008
Messages
2,225
Location
No really, I quit.
Doesn't Olimar needs Ivysaur's no freefall after UpB?
Ivysaur gains no horizontal momentum when she tries to latch back, while olimar quite obviously does. Against ivysaur I just hog the first vine whip then ledge drop spike the second attempt, she's still easy as hell to keep off the stage for a good part of the cast.
 

Eldiran

Smash Lord
Joined
Jan 8, 2008
Messages
1,707
Location
Pennsylvania
Oh well, let's not feed him
I concur.

Doesn't Olimar needs Ivysaur's no freefall after UpB?
Ivysaur gains no horizontal momentum when she tries to latch back, while olimar quite obviously does. Against ivysaur I just hog the first vine whip then ledge drop spike the second attempt, she's still easy as hell to keep off the stage for a good part of the cast.
Also, Olimar is crazy good in other ways to compensate for his recovery. I am actually a little sad he isn't high up enough in the tier lists to need a nerf, because fighting a good Olimar is such a nightmare...
 

Thinkaman

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Aug 26, 2007
Messages
6,535
Location
Madison, WI
NNID
Thinkaman
3DS FC
1504-5749-3616
Remember, Ivysaur is still auto-gimped if you grab the ledge DURING the up-b targeting it.
 

zxeon

Smash Lord
Joined
Apr 11, 2006
Messages
1,476
Location
Indianapolis, Indiana
It definitely falls neatly under the many "branch codesets" using the same codes for different purposes.

However, they're perfectly allowed to make they're own codeset, even though they were originally created for Brawl+.

It is not "something new" but it is not thievery, either.
I never said they weren't allowed or that they were stealing, but it is what it is. It's just another configuration of Brawl+. Because unlike replay and file replacement codes and stuff it's built on the foundations of Brawl+.
 

Rykoshet

Smash Champion
Joined
Mar 1, 2008
Messages
2,225
Location
No really, I quit.
I know we just covered it but I aqm going to make a detailed matcup post and likely a thread for it once it's comprehensive. Granted I play 2 characters that had their very essences or reliability changed but I consider that all the more reason to do so.
 

Big O

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jun 13, 2008
Messages
1,401
Location
California
NNID
BiiigOOO
I think you really need to stop arguing semantics zxeon. If you feel the need to defend yourself it would be better to just PM people who you feel misunderstand your posts.

Anyways I love what you guys did to Big Blue and Mushroomy Kingdom. I overlooked them before but after giving them a shot they are pretty fun and not really broken. I hated Big Blue since melee but slowing it down a little really makes all the difference. That and Sonic keeping up with the cars is too epic.
 

MK26

Smash Master
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Messages
4,450
Location
http://www.mediafire.com/?zj2oddmz0yy for ZSS fix!
Note: I wrote the gist of this approximately 3 days ago and had to rewrite it no fewer than 3 times due to internet crashes... :/

To start out with, I just tried out bBrawl, and I have to say I was impressed. I'm still stuck in the offense-oriented style of play that Brawl+ facilitates, so our matches weren't as campy as I would have thought. Of course, I miss Brawl+'s physics (ie combos and movement options), and not having aerial lag reduction was very disorienting, but bBrawl isn't a bad alternative. I appreciate the attempt to stay true to Brawl.

I remember someone calling an early version of Brawl+ "trying to fill in and redig a 1-foot hole with a bulldozer"; no matter how hard you try to keep that fragile balance intact, you can't help but mess up a few things, such as an autocanceled aerial when changing gravities, or a recovery when removing auto-sweetspot ledges, or a certain self-chaining throw when adding hitstun. The Brawl+ team has progressed far since the bulldozer days - we've unlocked, for the sake of the metaphor, a back-end loader that is much more precise than our first machines, but nothing will retain that 'Brawl' feel like the archaeological equipment bBrawl uses.

But maybe we don't want the fine tools, or at least we won't restrict the use of anything else. Maybe we see that it isn't the individual cracks in the soil that's holding Brawl back, but the soil itself. We use the back-end loader because those delicate tools cannot make the changes we believe are necessary to make Brawl competitive. Making all characters equal is fine and dandy, but what is a balanced cast with an imperfect game engine?

This is a matter of opinion; maybe you think that the engine itself is perfectly fine. The Brawl+ 'hole' will end up much differently than that of bBrawl, so much so that the two holes can easily coexist, and even prosper together. If you don't like one, go play the other. Or vBrawl. Or Melee or Smash 64. Just don't come in here and say "this game sucks, you're just leeching off us", or "this is what Brawl+ should have been", because you'd be wrong either way. The two games are separate products, unique in their goals and methods. They just share the codes (and maybe some ideas). Perhaps Brawl+ is more of a Smash 3.1(.4.2 beta), while this bBrawl Public Preview is Brawl 1.0.1, but the point is that they are both striving to be better than Brawl. Not each other.

======

Now, on to some feedback. I see that there hasn't been much on stages, so that's what the rest of this post will be about.

3. Increase Stage Viability

[...]

a. Walls and Walk-offs are fundamentally more fair

King Dedede, Falco, and Pikachu don't chainthrow off or into these anymore, and a bunch of locks that abused both are simply gone. Stages like Onett and Mario Circuit where these were the only problems are instantly back, stages like Distant Planet and Yoshi's Island (Melee) lose a layer of controversy in which everyone wins, and even stages like Bridge of Eldin and Mushroomy Kingdom 1-1 are a lot more worth talking about.
It's true that the #1 problem with walkoffs was due to chaingrabs, but blastzone camping is also a major problem. If a fast character with a projectile and a good bthrow just camps out near the edge of the stage, a character without a projectile will have trouble approaching and run the risk of getting KO'd as soon as he gets in.

Onett: Onett is just a poor stage altogether. There are still walls all over the place for wall locks (ex multi-jabs), blastzone camping is nigh unbeatable, and don't get me started on the cars. The layout is still very constricted, and it was really only Dedede's cg that was much of a problem - removing it isn't nearly enough to make me consider playing on this stage.Mario Circuit: Same deal as Onett, but to a lesser extent. Again, watch out for blastzone camping and annoying cars. This is another one I don't see working.

Distant Planet: I've always liked DP, even if it isn't the most competitively-oriented stage. The cg fix does get rid of a problem, and makes the stage closer to legal. How much closer is up to debate.

Yoshi's Island (Melee): Now that the cgs are gone, YI still has one problem in my eyes: small blastzones. Of course, having small blastzones could be a good thing...Personally, I find the double slopes a bit constricting as well. YI is better already, though.

Bridge of Eldin: No. Just no. It's just too much of a boon to camping. The bomb that breaks the stage in 2 completely grinds the match to a halt, and even when unbroken, it's too easy to spam a projectile all day.

MK 1-1: At first I was skeptical, but "Rainbow Cruise for ground characters" is an apt descriptor. Great job on this stage, I never thought I'd see the day when I considered Mushroomy Kingdom a legit counterpick.
b. Swimming mechanics are tweaked

This is a change that may be hit or miss with players, but let me put the implication out there first. Pirate Ship is now a very wholesome and fair level. Now, onto the explanation. When you hit the water in standard Brawl with any character (all are the same for this purpose, including Squirtle and Charizard), you first enter a normal "swimming" state. If you have spent too much total time in the water, you enter a "flailing" state. If you spend too much continuous time in the water, you then drown. the flailing state starts earlier depending on damage; you flail instantly at 90% damage or more. Of course, the system could be gamed by just jumping out of the water a lot in the flailing state. This "water stalling" was obnoxious at best on Pirate Ship, though many would argue simply game ruining. The new mechanics simply remove the flailing state and substitute it for drowning. This makes water VERY scary at higher damages, and it makes any sort of strategy that involves intentionally hanging out in the water obsolete. For those who fear for Delfino Plaza and Jungle Japes, don't. While it does have an effect, it is radically less on these stages than on the Pirate Ship. Once you realize the change is there, you should find your play on these stages nearly unaffected.
I am highly against the swimming fix. The intent is there, but it has a whole slew of side effects, such as creating a super-high blastzone once you hit 90%. Instead of making the water a place to be careful around, this fix only makes it something to be avoided, which isn't what it should be. Perhaps simply using the frame speed mod to speed up the swimming and flailing states 2x or 3x would suffice, but removing flailing altogether just won't cut it. Pirate Ship: Even though this works to fix to stage, it breaks it in another way. I began to fear chasing an opponent into the water after I died on the offensive. The blastzone height change at 90% also irks me. I doubt that you can remove the abuse of voluntarily going in the water (ie camping) without creating an abuse of involutarily going in (ie being hit in). Right now, Pirate Ship just isn't ready. (EDIT: give water the flower effect? Good idea? Possible?)

Jungle Japes: You already would want to get out of the water asap, this just restricts your timing when you hit higher percentages. Makes the stage worse, even if only by a little bit.

Delfino Plaza: The beauty of the water (not to mention the walkoffs) at Delfino is that it is temporary, and therefore just about immune to abuse in vBrawl. The fix only puts limitations on the attacker. Again, it's small, but it makes the stage overall worse.

c. Certain stages progress slower

Due to a design decision not to "ruin" what makes any stage unique, we are not freezing stages. However, simply changing the speed to some lower but non-zero value is fine, and it is interesting. Green Greens running at 2/3 speed, for instance, makes camping around the blocks a lot less effective as they spawn more slowly. PictoChat at 2/3 speed is generally much easier to react to. Big Blue at 2/3 speed makes the track survivable by everyone, even Ganondorf. On the other hand, half speed is reserved for Mushroomy Kingdom and Luigi's Mansion. The first makes the 1-1 version of the stage actually quite navigable for everyone, and the second makes mansion destruction strategies generally more potent.

d. Some blast zones have been tweaked

This type of change was used just twice. The first use was to make certain stages that were just too small bigger. Corneria now has all around larger blastzones which makes it less of a nightmare for characters like Jigglypuff, and Mushroomy Kingdom's upper blast zone now qualifies as sane. The second type is loop removal. Spear Pillar's lower blast zone is now pretty high which has some interesting implications, but the most important one is that the lowest part of the stage is effectively gone. Similarly, the Temple is now missing a large portion of its underside, changing it from a stage that was the classic example of why stages need to be banned to something worth discussing.
Stage slowdowns: Great job on all counts. Green Greens and Big Blue at 2/3 have a much larger positive effect than I expected them to. Though the hazards are out longer at Picto, there is more time between the hazards, so it's good. I especially like that the wind effect is slower. As I said before, great job on Mushroomy. Mansion is still fairly campy, and I miss deadlands, but it's better than vBrawl. I still think it's more suitable for doubles.

Blastzones: Though Corneria still has the wall to contend with, its blaszones are better. Perhaps give this treatment to Yoshi's Island Melee? Spear Pillar is still off...random floors caving in, laser beams coming out of the sky, and other random stuffz. The blastzone is too high, and I know you can;t lower it. All things considered, SP is a writeoff. Temple, even though the loop was removed, is still campy, and it seems to have too-close blastzones on all sides. I especially love what I have termed the "descent into Hell". Twas fun. Again, We've got a writeoff. It was worth trying, but I don't think it'll make the greatest cometitive stage.

e. WiFi Training Room now replaces Hanenbow in Versus Mode

Sorry Hanenbow fans; the codes are limited here. Also sorry about this code not working in Training Mode or, ironically enough, WiFi. Also, for the curious, Sandbag DOES remain, and this is not a code limitation but a deliberate choice. The way he works against projectile spamming makes him the perfect balance for a flat stage, and manipulating him is generally very deep strategically.

f. Spear Pillar and Shadow Moses Island can have their forms selected individually by button combination

This is simple, and the button combinations are as follows:

X or Y: Dialga/Metal Gear REX
L or R: Palkia/Metal Gear RAY
X or Y AND L or R: Cresselia/Gekko
Dude, replace 75m or Mario Bros., those stages don't have a ghost of a chance of being anywhere close to legal. Hanenbow has a chance, at least in doubles. Also, what specifically does the music code change (is it music on all instances of wifi waiting room, wifi waiting room only when attached to hanenbow, or what?), and how can I return it to normal? Also, the button combinations are cool and all, but they won't make either of those stages legal. Also, I support not making WWR aonther FD. Sandbag forever! :p

Of course, we would like to do more, but this is what we were actually able to do. With that said, here is our recommended stage list. The project was designed assuming this stage list, but of course we can only offer it as a suggestion.

Starter

Battlefield
Final Destination
Delfino Plaza
Yoshi's Island (Brawl)
Halberd
Lylat Cruise
Castle Siege
Smashville
PictoChat
Pokemon Stadium 1
WiFi Training Room (select Hanenbow)


NOTE: Rather than making a discriminating Starter and Starter/Counterpick section, it is just to be understood that removing any and exactly two of these stages from the Starter list to make a list of nine is not to be considered a deviation from the recommended rules.

Counterpick

Luigi's Mansion
Mushroomy Kingdom 1-1 (hold X or Y)
Mario Circuit
Pirate Ship
Norfair
Frigate Orpheon
Pokemon Stadium 2
Distant Planet
Yoshi's Island (Melee)
Jungle Japes
Onett
Corneria
Rainbow Cruise
Green Greens
Brinstar

Counterpick/Banned (most favorable to least favorable, roughly)

Spear Pillar: Dialga (hold X or Y)
Spear Pillar: Cresselia (hold X or Y AND L or R)
Green Hill Zone
Bridge of Eldin
Big Blue
Port Town Aero Dive
Temple
Skyworld
Shadow Moses Island


Banned

Mushroomy Kingdom 1-2 (hold L or R)
Rumble Falls
Spear Pillar: Palkia (hold L or R)
WarioWare Inc.
New Pork City
Summit
75m
Mario Bros.
Flat Zone 2
Hanenbow (unselectable)
I was going to argue the stage list, but it's only a suggested list. I'd just like to say that I don't consider anything below Brinstar playable (except Big Blue, wtf is it doing down there?). Half of what's above Brinstar should probably be shifted down a notch as well...

The next thing is that, if you are a competent coder who wishes to provide assistance, your help would be deeply appreciated, and you could definitely contribute to making this project better. Our wish list is shameless, and we can only say we have the sincerest of appreciation for anyone who can make it come true. Those looking to make suggestions might take note of this anyway; this is a list of concepts we would like to investigate in the future Paraphrased:

-Ledgestalling tweak (all ledgegrabs are limited to 7 times, like Ike's Aether)
-Stage hazard modification (would make several stages, such as Flat Zone 2 and Port Town Aero Dive, easy counterpicks)
-Rumble Falls no "speed up"
-WarioWare tweaked prize mechanics (always 4% healing), would stay true to design and be fair
-General water mechanics tweaks (being able to set drowning to be percentage independent and have a duration similar to some middle percentage would be ideal)
-Any codes to speed up character transformation time (presumably by exploiting the other two character slots in a 1v1)
I don't see Flat Zone 2 being legal, even with a stage hazard modifier...PTAD could work, though
I'm skeptical, but I'd like to see a fix for Rumble Falls
The minigames can cost you a stock. You end up fighting the stage, not the opponent. Is that fair? Frozen WarioWare is a great neutral. I know you've made a rule against it, but at least consider it
Again, for the water, 2x or 3x on swimming and flailing should do the trick (EDIT: flower effect on water)
I don't know if we want to speed up character transformation for Sheik/Zelda...that would increase interdependency and be seen as a buff to the two of them together, making any single-character strat weaker. Also, it'd probably be seen as unfair to PT if it didn't include him.

Also, related to this, is our very short section of known bugs.

-Stages that are normally frozen during character intros are not in this version. This is most noticeable on Halberd and Rumble Falls, but it doesn't cause real problems on either stage.
-Related to the previous issue, Pokemon Trainer's Pokemon frequently spawn in mid-air on Rumble Falls, causing them to spawn stuck in t-pose. Do not worry; this issue only applies to Rumble Falls.
-Landing grabs or doing certain other actions while the Timer item is in effect has extremely buggy and undesirable behavior. Universal speed changes from Training Mode, Special Brawl, or Dialga do not cause issues.
I didn't realize it before, but the Halberd problem applies to Brawl+ as well. We should get a fix for it.
As well, when we tested out Spear Pillar (Dialga) today, the screen sorta went fuzzy when he did his 'slow down time' routine. I'm not sure if that's supposed to happen and I just haven't been on that stage in so long that I forgot...

======

Other stuff: Is it a problem to include the buffer-handicap code in bBrawl? It doesn't really change anything, and being able to choose a buffer allows much greater precision.
Also, if you're considering any buffs for Kirby, I recommend looking at ftilt (damage or bkb buff) or nair (see BRawl+). Ftilt would be a buff in most matchups, the kind you would want to put in if it turns out that Kirby is low tier. As it is presently outshadowed by utilt, dtilt, fsmash, or jab, depending on the situation, this would result in a general buff. The nair buff present in Brawl+ (bkb 60 from 10) would be a more specific buff, as it pays greatly to have a ranged move that can positively trade hits with vertical recoveries and can kill. Bair is much more precise against a horizontal move, as, say, a Phantasm user can maneuver around the laggy nair. Running offstage to nair a Marth's Dolphin Slash, on the other hand, can easily result in hits trading, with Kirby going verical and Marth flying horizontally, away from the stage without his jumps. Nair is much too laggy to risk not hitting when offstage, regardless of its power, and so it would be very effective as a stock finisher but not as a general-purpose WOP-type move. Note that G&W's Parachute goes straight through nair, so it would be useless in that matchup.

I think I suggested it before, but you should add:
Coloured shields
File replacement
Unrestricted Color Choice
Unrestricted Pause Camera
Unrestricted Replay Camera
Unrestricted Button Mapping Editing
Tags in Replays
There was probably more, too

Altogether, AA and Think, I applaud your efforts thus far.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom