Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Like it was "going to be answered" at any other national they played at?who gives a ****, it will all be answered soon
apex 2013
euro tourny
genesis 3
that's the trilogy that i think will finally put all the GOAT question to rest
This. I want to watch these two throw blows. But Armada ain't no Hanky Panky though : PGotta admit though, Mango's been demolishing the last 6 months. Melee FC, Big House 2, IMPULSE, both Rule 6s, UCSB...and I wouldn't be surprised if he wins RoM and Kings of Cali.
APEX 2013 will be veeeerrryyy interesting
Yeah Mango seems to be ready for Apex and that makes me happy for sure =).Gotta admit though, Mango's been demolishing the last 6 months. Melee FC, Big House 2, IMPULSE, both Rule 6s, UCSB...and I wouldn't be surprised if he wins RoM and Kings of Cali.
APEX 2013 will be veeeerrryyy interesting
Wait, Genesis 3?who gives a ****, it will all be answered soon
apex 2013
euro tourny
genesis 3
that's the trilogy that i think will finally put all the GOAT question to rest
I wanna see that ken's postLove that Ken and Mango post on SWF, about a week or less apart from each other...too gudz.
Armada, I love you, respect you, blah blah blah, and most of the time I find what you say intelligent, useful, and relatively free of bias. The following series of remarks is not intended as a slam on you as a person or as a player, or on your fans (European or not), and if it comes across that way I'm genuinely sorry. Also please note that this is all coming from someone who genuinely believes that you are currently the best player in the world and will believe so until you have failed to win twice in a row, because for me, no matter how things "look" subjectively, it takes proof in the form of two wins to be "the best." Only takes one to be the champ, takes two to be the undisputed best.Various things?
Like what? (No examples so far)
No I can see that you don't look at sets individually or results from tournaments over the past few years either
What is a legit win? Cause no one on this boards seems to have a answer for that
Does it have to be close between me/Mango? Cause then last set at Genesis 1 can count either (more then 3 years ago anyway)
I have no idea how good in shape Mango was at Apex 2012 but he was rapeing everything until WF and destroyed PP at Rom 4(?) 4-5 weeks before Apex 2012 (if big tournaments like that was held that often in Europe)
Yeah you are free to have your opinion I just sometimes wonder how people think and how they come to conclussions that's why Im asking =)
Yeah I get your point but I don't agree with few cases compared to haveing it for a style as a person is the same. But if go against something you try to live after and always do it is the same then we clearly have different opinions.
I dont understand a word of this
Ofc I use examples in the past. This to prove my point. My youtube comment is even older then examples I was showing you and pretty much you entire first post against me was based on "something I did before". Guess only one is allowed to play that game.
I never said that you shouldnt use old examples, I'm saying that you shouldn't ****ing use unrelated ones to disprove my arguments. I already admitted that we are all hypocrites who hate on things that we have done in the past (realizing ones mistakes ey) and you try to prove that I'm a hypocrite by using past examples. See were you went wrong?
I don't blame you for thinking you are better. Like you said it is what I use too. BUT trying to get higher seedning/easier way to winning is actually something you have done a lot of times. There is a difference between us for sure.
Well congratulations, there is a difference between us that is in your opinion in your favor. No **** sherlock. And "a lot" of times is a HUGE overstatement, and I could without any problems find examples of you doing biased/wrong decisions too, but that isn't ****ing relevant.
I don't say "winning twice" have to be a rule. I usually use when Im seeding in Sweden cause it makes the seedning way more accurate (guess you don't know how that stuff works). Yeah rules is meant to be broken and reflect over them. But don't even try to deny you don't bend the rules to benefit yourself.
Again with the "I am better than you HAHA!". I think "winning twice" is a very flawed rule, but in many cases it can be true. Why you constantly try to attack me personally when it isn't of any relevance boggles my mind.
Seedning dosen't mean you have to be the best atm, if so we don't need tournaments and can just look at the seedning. But a seedning is something you work on after facts you do have from the past. Which mean best seed of all (Mango in America for example) is most likely to win and the results from the past puts him there cause he deserves it.
this part is messy...
You and all big TOs don't seed after "who's the most likely to win". You seed after "who has done the best in the past". "Who is the best" is a third category, that should be related but not dependent on "who has done the best in the past".
but keeeeeviiiiiiinnnnnnleave me out of this @ like few people mentioning me
not worth it