Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
¿qué? No entiendo.English, man, do you speak it?
I never said that the tier list's objectivity was equal for all regions, that's just you misunderstanding what I say. I just said that the tier list wasn't solely a representation of the North American metagame, and that the focus, the direction, the idea behind the BBR tier list was to make a tier list that reflects worldwide play. The data wasn't objective the whole way around, which is why it was voted to give it little significance. The MU chart and BBR votes have much, MUCH better representation of the worldwide metagame as a whole, since influence from players all over the globe was used to create them, which is why more weight was given to them.It still has a reflection of only the NA scene used in its data. Tournaments in other areas were not used objectively: according to what I read in the OP, they held ZERO objective merit, meaning that this tier list is primarily for NA even if people claim otherwise. If it was truly worldwide, European, Japanese, and Australian tournaments would have been required to make up a percentage each of the tier list weight when compared to NA tournaments. If it doesn't, you're just claiming it as worldwide because some of the members pay more attention to areas outside of NA (and rightfully so if they are living in say, Europe).
If those tournaments didn't hold weight like the ones in John#'s data, how can you say objectively that they influence the tier list an equal amount?
Honestly we should only be catering to ourselves at this point.We REALLY shouldn't be catering to the entire world, in my opinion.![]()
Quite a few of those high tier matchups are arguable, but i'm not going to get into that.Kirby doesn't have a good MU spread. He loses to most high and top tiers, with his best MUs against them being even. The only characters he has an advantage against are characters worse than him. (Except fox) He has a notable lack of results lately, how can a character be bumped up if both his MU spread AND results do not work in his favor?
We'll have a smashfest literally a few blocks away from him, planned for days that he said he'd come to, text us saying he's on his way, and then in the 5 minute car drive turn around and not tell anyone xDIn what way?
So..... marth does beat pikachuBut Marth is so easy @_@ And I'm the ****ing Pikachu main.
thisShe will, though, because Sheik is about as good as the other two characters you mentioned.
thats not really impressing anyone xDWill placed 25th at Apex, better than any mid tier except ocean's rob. He also placed 7th at Whobo (ledge grabs though) Ripple placed 33rd at whobo also with DK only. Those are just off the top of my head. Havent read all 18 pages yet but I'm sure someone has already mentioned this.
Dk has had more top players over the course of its history than sonic . If Cable, Dr. G, ook or Bum still played DK would be much higher.
NO. it's clearly peach making it possible for armada to win.Really sad to see the "Players are doing well with character X. It must be character X causing this, not the player" ideology is present in the Brawl community as well. Disgusting.
DudeThere are really two top level IC's in the NA, Vinnie and ESAM, and two top level Diddy's, ADHD and Gnes. So, they're tied on the level. Off the top of my head, the Diddy's that have dome something this year are:
ADHD, GNES, Player-1, Biglou, Zinoto, Fliphop, Vato, Lie, Felix, GDX
I would add Jebus, but I don't know what he has done. Even though most of them aren't winning nationals, there really isn't a character (maybe Olimar) that has that many high level players still taking names.
No, it's just not like +2 or +3So..... marth does beat pikachu![]()
\.
no im da bess.Dude
Half those players don't play as much anymore. Only Diddy that could potentially take a major is gnes.
Player 1, jebus are decent to but yeah not awesome.
![]()
But the MK banned tourneys have more money to their names as of now.Regardless, your original point was already foiled, the MK banned metagame is not a larger than the MK legal metagame.
Ask yourself, do you think Armada would be winning those nationals if he played as Spacies, Puff, or Sheik? Do you really think he'd take out the likes of Mango, Hbox, and M2K without that *****?NO. it's clearly peach making it possible for armada to win.
Well, here's my opinion on what it should look like:Btw. what do you think an MK banned tier list would look like ^^?
I think he's okay where he's at.People are underrating Pika. I know he doesn't really have the best representation, but he really does have the potential to be at least 6th. However, I understand why he is where he is. One day...
DDD is there because he ***** pretty much everyone below him and beats 1 or 2 characters above.Also, people overrate Dedede. He's really bad. People only use him for secondaries and really, his match-ups outside of Wario aren't impressive and another character could easily fill that gap. His representation of players that main him is lacking too. Coney, 4God, and Atomsk are great, but Coney's getting spotty on attendance, 4God needs to travel more, and Atomsk just came back to using Dedede for important matches. And everyone seems to forget he has 6 -2 or higher match-up that are all high tier (although I believe ZSS needs to be -1). Is that really what a high tier character is? I could see him at the top of borderline and be completely happy.
bubba I see you posting in all these important threads and you just seems as though you aren't knowledgeable at all...But the MK banned tourneys have more money to their names as of now.
Ask yourself, do you think Armada would be winning those nationals if he played as Spacies, Puff, or Sheik? Do you really think he'd take out the likes of Mango, Hbox, and M2K without that *****?
Well, here's my opinion on what it should look like:
Top
A:![]()
![]()
![]()
B:![]()
![]()
High
C:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
D:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Mid
E:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
F:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Low
G:![]()
![]()
H:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
watI think people shouldn't do pocket metaknights. That is probably what started this WHOLE thing.
IMO:Does Luigi really have to be that low, I mean...Bad recovery yeah, but THAT low.
I think people shouldn't do pocket metaknights. That is probably what started this WHOLE thing.
Man, a LOT of people have been saying ICs there, but you single out one guy for a call-out. Make you feel like a big man?bubba I see you posting in all these important threads and you just seems as though you aren't knowledgeable at all...
you put fox in C tier, really? oh and jiggly over ganon LOL good one
I also like your placement of icies at number 1, did you download the data at all?
Even not looking at the sheer data, who else other than Vinnie and ESAM show a domincance with the character? Almost every other top user of the character isn't as good as those two and the second you leave the top 5 and maybe about 3 more IC mains there's dropped grabs non-stop
I don't want to criticize the knowledge of others who I haven't seen post other things, unlike bubba (who in the previous tier list thread, v6 now closed) was just completely wrong about various things and seemed ignorant to me.Man, a LOT of people have been saying ICs there, but you single out one guy for a call-out. Make you feel like a big man?