Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Right. Because saying 'yo, you cant pick that guy' is FAR less understandable and far more complecated than forcing everyone at a tournment to buy an sd card, learn how to work smash stack, download all the correct files, and memorising all of the specific intracate changes that some random possibly biased people made to the game that most people were enjoying to begin with....
DUPER banned.
So does that mean Sakurai will try to go back to cubes/boxes or whatever for Smash 4, or is he just making an observation?
Wario's hitboxes would be disgustingly good.
We just have a difference of opinion. You would rather everyone just sucks up the character ban and other pitfalls. I would rather people suck up the SD card so we can keep Meta Knight and stop the ridiculous edge counting rules. Among other things of course.
Consider we've had spheres for two Smash games now, I doubt it would be changing. Smash64's rectangular hitboxes were likely a technical thing to cut down on processing.
A fellow Kasrani <3And there's absolutely nothing wrong with that.
i dont know why this made me laugh so much.
<3Dittos are pretty silly most of the time.
Indeed. I know Shugo is already contemplating what character he can develop to take the place of his Metaknight in avoiding Falco dittos, ICs, etc. That right there is a winner's mindset, and I'm pretty ashamed of anyone who quit over this ban.
Redhalberd is proban...
That match-up chart is old as well, although it is still quite accurate. It also makes me wonder how you can even think of Rachel being as unbalanced as Meta Knight when she clearly has 3 even match-ups (Nu is considered even now). Blazblue only had 12 characters, so, excluding herself, she was even with 3/11 of the cast. Furthermore he had 6 60-40's (Noel 55-45?? @_@) and 2 70-30's. Well I wish Meta Knight had such match-ups. Also dont forget that facing a disadvantaged match-up is MUCH easier in Blazblue! Their 70-30 is more like... our +2.
I think you are forgetting the fact that MK isn't getting banned here in the States just because of his inherent strengths as a character. That's only a small fraction of the reason.
He was actually glad when he found out that MK was banned. He's had a lot of other secondaries in his pockets prior to this.
"Ridiculous rules". How is putting rules in Meta Knight users so he can't dominate the cast super easily an exact bad thing now? Let's keep in mind that even with all the rules that put in to nerf him, he's still winning the most, and by quite a large margin. And no, what you're saying is not any more realistic. We ban stuff in sports too for a reason. Illegal plays, wrestling moves, and so on. Both are competitive, by the way. If you're in something heavily competitive rules are needed for various reasons, including inducing fair play.
Which you've already voiced your opinion. You're simply advertising another way to play it,
And that committee runs their own tournaments. Don't play in them if you don't wish to. Nobody is saying you should, after all. We respect that you don't like it. Or atleast I do.
Yeah, and those hypotheticals exist as well. Also, as I said earlier, I don't promote competitive cheating. It's clear by now that the URC doesn't either. But you can specifically make a new topic appealing to them(or go to an appropriate topic for that).
And some people find that a "negative" step instead. And actually, yes, you are complaining about it. You're also telling us we should specifically use Balanced Brawl instead of banning character. The only way for this to work is that every American player has to get Balanced Brawl. Now, I don't know about you, but it sounds like you're suggesting a monopoly on something that's meant for fun. Likewise, many people do not like to cheat, and would refuse to do it on that principle alone. Are they wrong for playing the game without cheating?
the usual retort SmashChu will have to that, is that the Brawl cannot argue as to why they don't do like other fighting games communities when it comes to banning characters or not.I think you are forgetting the fact that MK isn't getting banned here in the States just because of his inherent strengths as a character. That's only a small fraction of the reason.
I may not be a proponent of this ban, but c'mon, at least I have an idea of where they're coming from.
Smooth Criminal
He's been busy yelling at people in the URC topic about how we "all banned MK for our own benefit", and conveniently ignoring any claims that he wants MK legal for his own benefit.
I know. It's not as good as his MK though. I'm sure he'll be on the road to being a top Wario though. Kid is nasty.
The community was split for the worst with MK being legal. People were talking of quitting or legitimately working on having MK as a main or a tool against other MKs if he didn't get banned. He hurts the community because he forces 2 decisions: 1. Pick MK or 2. Quit.
