Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
uh.........I think by top level, BPC means players that could place top 8 in a national sized tourney.I think youre forgetting a few.
theres actually 2 falco, Dehf and shugo
3 diddys, felix
youre also forgeting:
the 2 ikes
the at least 2 sonics
the 3 DKs
the 3 foxes
coneys ddd
the two lucarios
the luigi
the 1 or 2 lucases
the 2 nesses
the pikachu
2 or 3 shieks.
the toon link
the 2 wolfs
and like 2 or 3 yoshis.
Im pretty sure thats more top level players and top level characters than europe and japan put together.
I was also talking about character specific top level players. You also can not have player skill without a player. the bar does not set the bar, the players set the barI forgot to answer this but I did a search just so that I could refute this:
Top level players are just top level players because they have more skill than other players, also I think the bar is just set by top level players. Therefore the bar is set by more skill than other players. And since the bar is the sum of the bar set by the top players the bar in itself has more skill than any individual top player and arguably as much as all of them together. Therefore it is important to remember that the bar sets the bar just as much the top level players. Therefore you are wrong.
Yes, but please, surely can see that specificity does not necessarily imply skill, this can be proven by a fact such as that Peach is a crappy character; furthermore, skill while skill can be broken down into a specific set of actions, thereby making the player an arbitrary component of the concept which extentended over the course of a best out of 7 set might be more accurately refered to as a phenomenon (but not in a mere best out of 3 set, because that's too short); nonetheless, we cannot simply ignore the fact that Sonic is a very gay character.I was also talking about character specific top level players. You also can not have player skill without a player. the bar does not set the bar, the players set the bar
I might be over thinking this but...... at a National sized tourney shouldn't there ideally be only about 16-20 people that can place top 8? There can only be 8 best players in top 8 loluh.........I think by top level, BPC means players that could place top 8 in a national sized tourney.
No, I'm telling you that you're scrubs when you ***** and moan about it instead of either getting better or changing your character or just accepting it.But.......no.......wait.
You're telling us that because we can't win vs MK, were scrubs because we can't?
So Shugo is reasonably on the same level as Ally, M2K, Anti, DEHF, ADHD, and Dabuz?I think youre forgetting a few.
theres actually 2 falco, Dehf and shugo
So Felix is reasonably on the same level as Ally, M2K, Anti, DEHF, ADHD, and Dabuz?3 diddys, felix
Even if any of them is on the same level as the aforementioned players, they're made irrelevant by the fact that they main a character who is somewhere between mediocre and garbage.youre also forgeting:
the 2 ikes
the at least 2 sonics
the luigi
the 1 or 2 lucases
the 2 nesses
2 or 3 shieks.
the toon link
the 2 wolfs
and like 2 or 3 yoshis.
So any of these other than Will is reasonably on the same level as Ally, M2K, Anti, DEHF, ADHD, and Dabuz?the 3 DKs
I count one Fox who is on that level. Not 3. The other two may be damn good players, but they are not at the top.the 3 foxes
These I'll give you.coneys ddd
the two lucarios
the pikachu
Yes... Except that most of them are made irrelevant through their character choice (the same way a really, really good Dan main is irrelevant in SF4 or a really good Pichu or Kirby is irrelevant in Melee. They may place very well at regionals, or very rarely make a good showing at a major national, but they, for all intents and purposes, do not matter for this discussion because their characters suck. Then you went on to list a whole bunch of players who are simply not on the level of players like M2K and Ally, and then like 4 who may well be, one of which is retired/retiring not sure.Im pretty sure thats more top level players and top level characters than europe and japan put together.
Get wreckedMeh, I don't care what he thinks on the subject anymore. He has ridiculously impossible standards on top of not even living here. Convincing him doesn't matter anyway, the reality is apparent...the ban is happening. Whiners and moaners we may be, but ultimately getting what is desired are we.
![]()
Would atleast like to fix that only 2 Yoshi's are doing notably good at nationals.I think youre forgetting a few.
theres actually 2 falco, Dehf and shugo
3 diddys, felix
youre also forgeting:
the 2 ikes
the at least 2 sonics
the 3 DKs
the 3 foxes
coneys ddd
the two lucarios
the luigi
the 1 or 2 lucases
the 2 nesses
the pikachu
2 or 3 shieks.
the toon link
the 2 wolfs
and like 2 or 3 yoshis.
No, what IS getting ridiculous is that your seeming intent with using examples like this one is to indicate that some characters might be able develop to the point that MK still wont **** their ***** if the players are on a high level and have matchup experience. This is ridiculous because, theorycrafting being unreliable and all, it's still unlikely to the point that it doesn't come near to functioning as an argument.
Furthermore, youre examples from street fighter and other games simply don't apply, you are ignoring the extent of MK's ability to dominate. Sure I don't get to ***** about DDD because I picked DK, but I think it's within reason to feel a little bit frustrated when you're gonna get **** on for picking any other character than MK, sure this isn't the case in europe, but that is irrelevant because this concerns the american metagame in which your possible metaknight counters are just not that. I dig how you even wrote that aren't obviously stomped on to clarify what a counter means when talking about MK; nonetheless, it would've been more accurate to just leave out the word counter altogether.
But this **** is all because you project your own ideals onto the community. You mention that people still lose to crap characters now and then due to matchup experience, hmm could have this have something to do with metaknight having dominated the scene? In an ideal world we might have people being able to manage everything at once; however, after 4 years it's quite clear that this isn't going to happen. Indeed I think it is perfectly within reason to assume it likely that the banning of metaknight can be very good for the metagame because several characters see a big rise in viability with him banned. This in turn might then force other people to increase their knowledge of the game and learn new matchups, something they might actually be able to do now that they don't have to focus on beating ****ing metaknight.
Yeah I worded that wrongBut Kain, doesn't everyone make arguments to serve their purposes?
Do you mean, makes up?
/winpaperclipstatus
![]()
the ongoing history of brawl on a national level seems to be something likeJust like how MK's hold down other matchups, I kinda believe that the best MK's might also keep down weaker MK's that excel at other MU's.
...Just no. They're on the higher end of super high level play. But they are NOT the same level as Tyrant, M2K, Ally, DEHF, Gnes, Razer, etc.What?????? Nakat and trevonte are def. ****ing top. wth...
-****ing floored-Theorycraft is a terrible way of establishing character ability in real matches.
I don't even think it's honor. More like incompetence. It's not That easy to just scrooge because while it's extremely gay, small technical error = stock. Unless they are 100% percent confident, technical and proficient with their character on and more importantly offstage, along with having a solid gimp game to make the risk reward in their favor, I think that zoning properly with MK is more realistic and Consistent to get wins.You don't see MK's playing like that much because yes a lot of them are "honorable" at certain timing out stuff (
I do think there are like maybe... 5? roflM2K being the only person on a completely different level with his character. TKD immediately comes to mind.
In b4 people learn to beat olimar then you start *****ing or probably quit a year from nowMK is banned after Apex, there is no reason to talk about this :3
/thread
*trollface*
I've played most of those people... and beaten a bunch. They aren't on M2Ks level, I'm sorry. There are people that arguably can be, but none of the people you namedPersonally, I find this the be incredibly disingenuous and highly disrespectful to people like fatal, and razer, coney, shugo, kain, will, espy, san, and plenty others.
there's like 40 chars, so that's not that much % wise in comparison to the cast though : |. It's all numbers and how you interpret it, you just seem to choose to show them in a way that... well fits your argument. nothing wrong with that but pointing it out.MK is 2.5x more popular than the 2nd most popular.
that seems kinda ridiculous to me. pretty sure no other fighting game character comes close to that.
LOLOh come on, MK isn't that broken. He would lose to someone like Ike due to the accuracy of his Fair when MK in in the air. And, he is easily edgehogged.
After the jab you faired/floated the opposite direction from MK, making you lose stage control and putting you into a worse position (the ledge)
I don't think this is true at all.characters outside of high tier (especially Mid tier) actually CAN make a splash in the game.
Brinstar been banned in the US ***** LOL.Fox gets destroyed on FD against ICs and against Jiggs on brinstar
I've seen sonics, peaches, ect beat MKs....I would like to state that I actually have seen Fox beat Pikachus or Wolf beat DDDs, Warios, or Pikachus because these three mentioned characters do not carry the options nor a broken ruleset that caters to them.
LOLPound 5 was like a year ago.
/loves your postsBrinstar is not a legal stage in Super Smash Bros. Melee.
Fox vs. IC's on FD is evenish or 45-55, but even then the match-up is still in Fox's favor if you take into account every stage, so it's a moot point.
SL gimp isn't even that gay if you DI it right most of the time. Knock back should be nerfed definitely, but there's no angle problems... Dsmash isnt that gay either. Tornado is vs certain characters, it depends. You main DK tho so w/eMK must be the balanced brawl edition of MK
less OP tornado, F-smash and D-smash nerf, and shuttle loop gimp hitbox weakened plus higher angle
Please dont start that... you will embarass yourself and then i will have to write another essay....So you're a scrub
I like how you pretend to know about melee. LMAOI like how my point on fox CAN be CP by ICS on FD or jiggs on brinstar isn't valid because no one plays ICs
I know a lot of good players that think it's even or even possibly +1 diddys advantage though... Either way it's not holding the character back.snake beats diddy. pretty sure that isn't being debated by people.
Hey it's that move that you didn't understand how the hitbox worked a few months ago LMAO
-died-Naw you guys will get tired of seeing dabuz in grand finals![]()
thisuh.........I think by top level, BPC means players that could place top 8 in a national sized tourney.
/we outDon't rank Dabuz THAT high just yet, spitfire.
![]()
Shugo has beaten ally before so I would say yes.So Shugo is reasonably on the same level as Ally, M2K, Anti, DEHF, ADHD, and Dabuz?
Felix is on the other side of the country from me so I dont here about him as much as I would like, but last I heard, hes definitely just as good as gnes and adhd.So Felix is reasonably on the same level as Ally, M2K, Anti, DEHF, ADHD, and Dabuz?
Cable is definitely on the same level as will.So any of these other than Will is reasonably on the same level as Ally, M2K, Anti, DEHF, ADHD, and Dabuz?
So nakat and trevonte can beat tyrant, but theyre not top level players?I count one Fox who is on that level. Not 3. The other two may be damn good players, but they are not at the top.
This conflicts with youre earlier stance that if we just work really hard and become perfect players we dont know which character may turn out to be the MK counter.Yes... Except that most of them are made irrelevant through their character choice (the same way a really, really good Dan main is irrelevant in SF4 or a really good Pichu or Kirby is irrelevant in Melee. They may place very well at regionals, or very rarely make a good showing at a major national, but they, for all intents and purposes, do not matter for this discussion because their characters suck. Then you went on to list a whole bunch of players who are simply not on the level of players like M2K and Ally, and then like 4 who may well be, one of which is retired/retiring not sure.
To solve the problem, I just shouldn't have gone to the ledge.After the jab you faired/floated the opposite direction from MK, making you lose stage control and putting you into a worse position (the ledge)
You powershielded the dash attack misjudged the PS, after you wiffed the jab I think the best option would have been to just roll torwards the center of the stage immediately (her rolls arent great but it would have worked very easily). Since havok missed he was put in a awkward scenario where he has to try and react, but trying to pressure metaknight from that particular spacing is hard for peach, but being the safest option with no punish bar MK completely committing and being extremely punishable himself, it would have netted you stage control.
If havoks roll was a habit and not a reaction it would have been easy to grab on reaction, MKs back roll isnt to fast and you're already in shield at the proper spacing. If it wasn't you still have control of the pace of the match.
You di'd the dsmash ****ing weird I don't even think I would have wanted to ground tech that ****, but on your wake up you should have just stood up, or wait stand up/getup for mixups. Rolling into MK makes it easy for him to cover your options especially from that range. If you got up he would have had to walk forward some, to maybe tilt you (he could go for a dash grab but that's pretty committed and not as reliable without an extremely good reaction). I knew this from experience but just taking a 2 second look at peach frame data you can also tell that those where your best options...............
Get-up Roll Forward
Duration: 34
Invincibility: 1-19
Get-up Roll Backward
Duration: 35
Invincibility: 1-19
Get-up Stand
Duration: 29
Invincibility: 1-19
Get-up Attack
Duration: 55
Hits on Frames: 17, 25
Invincibility: 1-27
here they are incase you're to lazy.
After the Dsmash you should have just dropped and gone to the ledge, it's a worse position but that's what you get when you make a mistake. Instead you picked a greedy option and decided to jump back on stage with fair, which at that angle is pretty easy for MK to option cover since peaches mixups from that position are marginal at best....
Second time you land you also just went onstage with a fair, so at this point it's just a bad habit. If you think you can get away with it sure but doing it twice in a row is bad... He didnt punish you thankfully but it's not that great of a position and you made a poor decision of spot dodging and got dsmashed (not even in his grab range lol, and tornado would be a pretty stand move to apply there).
After you got dsmashed you tried to float back to the stage a 3rd time, but at least you realized it was a bad decision I think... probably because havok was already there waiting. You stopped floating, havok grabs the ledge and you make a smart decision to upB, however your spacing was off. You di'ed in torwards the stage to fast and upBed to soon. When you floated if you just dropped and didnt change your current spacing MK could not hit you with anything, and then once his invince frames are down and he's not flashing anymore you are free to upB. If havok decided to nair he gets either stage spiked (unlikely but it happened before LOL) or you get free stage control. If he's smart and just rolls on stage you are on the ledge, not the greatest position ever, but at least you have options outside of dying and more importantly mixups.
After the nair, and from the multiple mistakes made to put you in said position, you where kinda in a ****ty situation and no matter what you do here the risk reward is really skewed, but you still went for a pretty.... reactable? option. Even if Havok didn't react it requires like no spacing for him he can just upB and if he misses ledge guard you, lmao.
You're best option there would be to either wait and upB and a gay angle for the parasol you think he's trying to play the react game, and the best you can try and do is vary your fast fall and horizontal speeds. airdodging might have been possible, but with peaches frame data I wouldn't do it, he decided not to SL you would probably just die outright.
Then you have garbage DI on the shuttle loop.
In 15 minutes I wrote that for you derp, you weren't even option covered moreso than punished for bad (although well executed) decisions. Don't get me wrong you're a great player but don't act like you don't have room to improve or something, there where options available to you at times, and despite it being a hard counter MU, you might have been able to win.
#im not doing this for all of your vids btw
KID, don't have time for the rest of your post, but this I really have to address. Can you tell the difference between a solid character and a garbage character? Here, let me help you out.
Snake is a solid character. Olimar is a solid character. ZSS, Pikachu, and Diddy Kong are all solid characters.
Luigi is a garbage character. Mario is a garbage character. Sonic is a garbage character. Ike is borderline garbage. Lucas is a garbage character.
Ftilt isnt as gay of a punish and it would have allowed you to even have a chance to sdi out, and grabbing is requires a much more solid reaction that standing in place and doing something. You're in a bad situation, so it's not like you're supposed to have great option, I just think those are the two that will likely net you the least punishment, because rolling literally will "give" him the tech chase.To solve the problem, I just shouldn't have gone to the ledge.
I know what my mistakes are, but you're telling me my best option was to just standup or do a getup attack? He could have just shielded -> ftilted me or grabbed EASILY (I'm not that far away). When it comes to the fair habit onstage at least the 2nd fair was actually really good. It went unpunished, allowed for me to spotdodge his d-tilt, and then I tried to input a jab but the down-smash beat it (so I literally had no other options).
The parasol was properly spaced. Peach's parasol can't beat Metaknights nair unless the Metaknight is not nairing correctly.
I used the Peach bomb as a mixup, but now I guess I know I should rather be taking damage instead of dying at a stupid percentage.
Thanks for the help though.
M2K also has success in melee tho.To be fair, most of M2K's Brawl dominance stems from a period where a lot of people still didn't know how to play the damn game while he was lightyears ahead of anyone, including the other MKs. Ally's "success" for this game, over the long run, easily rivals M2K's.
![]()
You dont know anything about sonic, and i know this because i personally destroyed you with him.KID, don't have time for the rest of your post, but this I really have to address. Can you tell the difference between a solid character and a garbage character? Here, let me help you out.
Snake is a solid character. Olimar is a solid character. ZSS, Pikachu, and Diddy Kong are all solid characters.
Luigi is a garbage character. Mario is a garbage character. Sonic is a garbage character. Ike is borderline garbage. Lucas is a garbage character.
this.Everyone looks garbage next to MK![]()
I think everyones definition of levels are different then.lol. Kid, Kain no one is saying those players arent good, no offense but yall crazy saying shugo and ally are on the same level, or implying ally's success has rivaled M2Ks. If thats not what youre trying to say, then none of that really affects the point thats being made.
we know it's a gay MU already tho....It's a brutal position to be in with Peach in the first place.
If he rolls back, dash grab/nado.
If he jumps, f-tilt on jump startup or nado, or shuttle loop if he's a bit closer.
If he spotdodges, punish with whatever.
If he keeps his shield up, free grab or more tilt/nado pressure.
It's one stacked game of chess in his favor, let me tell ya.
![]()
I mean, I agree with you that we can put m2k and june, etc in the same category of "top player". I just think theres fairly visible greater distinctions even in that broad category.I think everyones definition of levels are different then.
Personally I think theres a large number of people that are on the same 'level' as m2k and ally. Even though the 2 of them are better then everyone else, its not on some unattainable plane. Otherwise people wouldnt even be able to take games or stocks of of them. I watched Junebug beat m2k in a set. Is junebug better as a whole then m2k? no. but they are clearly on the same echelon.
Nah, not really.Everyone looks garbage next to MK![]()
Did we even play in singles? I thought it was just doubles, where I was stuck teaming with probably the second most free person at the tournament because someone told me he was good... Either way, does it matter? I lost to you. Boo hoo. Germany has a total sonic count of 1, and that one sonic is beyond free. I did not know the matchup. But you know what? Sonic is still a crappy character, who is far enough down the tier list that players who are geniunely amazing losing with him is not a big deal–he's just got some ****ty matchups, some real weaknesses as a character. It doesn't matter if I'm good at fighting him; what matters for this argument is that he is either partially or completely unviable as a character. Just like most of the rest I mentioned.You dont know anything about sonic, and i know this because i personally destroyed you with him.
I could john all day (hell, I'm not even sure we played 1v1), but I'll just say that I should've known the matchup better and didn't, and leave it at that.BPC lost to KiD's Sonic? Come on man...I even beat him with my MK (on FD) and I don't even main him. Why are you losing to garbage characters dawg? You main MK.
![]()