• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Metaknights' Even matchups? Open discussion

DMG

Smash Legend
Joined
Feb 12, 2006
Messages
18,958
Location
Waco
Slippi.gg
DMG#931
Im pretty sure tons of top players believe he should be banned. However a lot of them think its so late in the game's life to do so. I do believe that could be remedied by a better stage list. BS stages like RC shouldnt even exist. Theres too many stages in the stage list that make this top character into an easy win character.
More conservative stage list won't save the game, but it would be a start.

:/...Meta Knight IS muchmuchmuch stronger at mid level play than top level... at least IMO

but he's still kinda banworthy. he doesn't NEEEEED to be gone... but the metagame would be sooooo much healthier without him
Eh, I mean not really. Take all the MK players, teach them Diddy/Snake/Falco/IC's. That's the new metagame either way lol. Maybe a sprinkle of marth.
 

Vex Kasrani

Smash Master
Joined
Jul 13, 2007
Messages
4,824
Location
Philadelphia, PA
:/...Meta Knight IS muchmuchmuch stronger at mid level play than top level... at least IMO

but he's still kinda banworthy. he doesn't NEEEEED to be gone... but the metagame would be sooooo much healthier without him
He's ridiculous in both levels of play, however, I agree with exactly what you're saying, game becomes more balanced between top and high tiers with Metaknight gone.
 

B.A.M.

Smash Lord
Joined
Mar 13, 2008
Messages
1,538
Location
Fullerton, CA
NNID
Bambatta
I say a conservative stage list would make MK tolerable. I truly believe we need to do away with these stupid i win stages. I mean there some other characters that have those too. They all usually happen to be the dumb stages like RC brinstar Delfino Castle Siege whatever. I say just do away with them and we automatically have a more balanced game WITH MK. I think its a good direction to start with.

@ John: Im fully aware there were contradictions. You pointing it out doesnt do anything. Im just telling you what people have said. And thats how they feel. I definitely see WHY people feel that way. Some feel its too early in the sense that theres tons more to figure out in this game. Some say its too late because if a ban went through that would alienate a gargantuan portion of the community.
 

Life

Smash Hero
Joined
Jul 19, 2010
Messages
5,264
Location
Grieving No Longer
I say a conservative stage list would make MK tolerable. I truly believe we need to do away with these stupid i win stages. I mean there some other characters that have those too. They all usually happen to be the dumb stages like RC brinstar Delfino Castle Siege whatever. I say just do away with them and we automatically have a more balanced game WITH MK. I think its a good direction to start with.
I'll let BPC tear apart the underlying logic behind this (he's better at that), but I have to ask: who seriously autowins on CS? (Or any of the other ones, for that matter--don't say MK, nobody's proved it--but CS seems particularly out of place there.)
 

John12346

Smash Master
Joined
Jan 24, 2009
Messages
3,534
Location
New York, NY
NNID
JohnNumbers
@ John: Im fully aware there were contradictions. You pointing it out doesnt do anything. Im just telling you what people have said. And thats how they feel. I definitely see WHY people feel that way. Some feel its too early in the sense that theres tons more to figure out in this game. Some say its too late because if a ban went through that would alienate a gargantuan portion of the community.
Well, then they should at least use the reasoning that a ban discussion shouldn't happen because of all the flaming/trolling/headaches for the moderators that will most likely occur, not say that "it's too late to bother."
 

B.A.M.

Smash Lord
Joined
Mar 13, 2008
Messages
1,538
Location
Fullerton, CA
NNID
Bambatta
and im explaining their reasoning. Whether its terribad, you decide.

As far as CS, I know for some characters vs D3 its really dumb. Its definitely not an auto win, but it definitely sucks. I would like to say I completely understand what you are saying; juxtaposed with the others its not that bad. I truly do want to hear BPC and the rest of our stage researchers in regards as to what stage list would promote a healthier environment for competition. I myself dont really see anything wrong with the BF, SV, and FD. I would like to know as far as starters go why that wouldnt be a smart move.

I feel that every character gets some advantage out of one of those 3. And I feel the disadvantages gained arent too bad vs other characters either. So iono. I truly believe ( and talking with some top players that believe the same) that the stage list is key to a more balanced brawl. So I would love to hear other opinions on the matter.
 

Life

Smash Hero
Joined
Jul 19, 2010
Messages
5,264
Location
Grieving No Longer
So iono. I truly believe ( and talking with some top players that believe the same) that the stage list is key to a more balanced brawl.
Two things I want to say to this.
1. Did you see my ruleset? I have a line almost exactly like this at the end of my intro speech, lol. (Not gonna link it here, it's still a work-in-progress, so if you do decide to dig it up don't take it as Incom canon yet.)
2. I recall reading a statistic somewhere. It said that MK dominates at about the same rate regardless of the stagelist. However, the rest of the power concentrates in the A-tier more on a restrictive list whereas it spreads out more on an open list. If anyone remembers what I'm talking about, please back me up.
 

Judo777

Smash Master
Joined
Sep 9, 2008
Messages
3,627
I feel like a more conservative stage list would give a large boost to chars like Diddy, Falco, Olimar, and IC's. I don't think a good remedy to MK is to boost he next few chars in line to go even with him. I think it needs to apply to a bit more of the cast.

Just my opinion.
 

SFA Smiley

The SFA King
Joined
Jan 19, 2010
Messages
2,640
Location
Virginia/Arizona
That's exactly what i was thinking, actually. My characters don't have a hard time on any stage though so stages have never been my concern.
 

F.U.B.A.R.

Smash Rookie
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
11
Location
Anywhere with my controller in hand. (Texas)
The only even MU would be Metaknight himself. Although, characters such as Snake, Falco, Diddy, Fox, and Pikachu can beat him but if the players both know the MU at the same level and have the same amount of experience the MK should win the match. So if you wanna beat him you just need to learn the MU better than your opponent.
 

Reizilla

The Old Lapras and the Sea
Joined
Mar 20, 2008
Messages
13,676
MK loses to Marth because we out-range him with Shield Breaker and have an invincible up B. So theoretically, we're never going to get hit.

/thread
 

DMG

Smash Legend
Joined
Feb 12, 2006
Messages
18,958
Location
Waco
Slippi.gg
DMG#931
I feel like a more conservative stage list would give a large boost to chars like Diddy, Falco, Olimar, and IC's. I don't think a good remedy to MK is to boost he next few chars in line to go even with him. I think it needs to apply to a bit more of the cast.

Just my opinion.
Here's the problem with that: the stages characters ouside of A tier like... tend to also be stages MK likes as well. What's the point of having Delfino on a 5 stage starter list for "variety" when MK likes it the most anyways?

The way I see it, I'd rather make those A tier characters have the strongest possible chance of winning vs MK, than start adding Delfino Frigate etc to the starter list for the likes of lower tiered characters who would end up losing ANYWAYS on those stages because MK likes them.

If FD was the first stage in every set, you'd see fights between characters who like the stage and vs MK. If RC was the first stage in every set, you'd see Peach vs Falco look even at the cost of making MK a ******. Or say instead it's Delfino. Sure, Luigi now gets to play vs x character and get a fairly good MU, but now MK's MU got even harder.

The only even MU would be Metaknight himself. Although, characters such as Snake, Falco, Diddy, Fox, and Pikachu can beat him but if the players both know the MU at the same level and have the same amount of experience the MK should win the match. So if you wanna beat him you just need to learn the MU better than your opponent.
I like spending more time and effort than my opponent in the hopes that he doesn't do the same back to me.
 

Judo777

Smash Master
Joined
Sep 9, 2008
Messages
3,627
Here's the problem with that: the stages characters ouside of A tier like... tend to also be stages MK likes as well. What's the point of having Delfino on a 5 stage starter list for "variety" when MK likes it the most anyways?

The way I see it, I'd rather make those A tier characters have the strongest possible chance of winning vs MK, than start adding Delfino Frigate etc to the starter list for the likes of lower tiered characters who would end up losing ANYWAYS on those stages because MK likes them.

If FD was the first stage in every set, you'd see fights between characters who like the stage and vs MK. If RC was the first stage in every set, you'd see Peach vs Falco look even at the cost of making MK a ******. Or say instead it's Delfino. Sure, Luigi now gets to play vs x character and get a fairly good MU, but now MK's MU got even harder.



I like spending more time and effort than my opponent in the hopes that he doesn't do the same back to me.
Or we could just ban MK then have a greater stage variety and have a more balanced game..........................
 

Blacknight99923

Smash Champion
Joined
Jan 1, 2009
Messages
2,315
Location
UCLA
stating the obvious but high tiers are better characters, if your using ness your probably not going to win now.

I don't see the offside of turning dominance into co-dominance with 5 other characters at the same time.

I'd rather watch sets be played on the same 5 stages than watching metaknight dittos in 5 winners games (or w.e it was) ,3 losers games (w.e it was) and 6 GF games.

Real talk would apex have been nearly as hype if we watched up to 4 sets of metaknight dittos in finals?I was under the impression seeing falco and olimar take top spots was exciting for a change.
 

Tesh

Smash Hero
Joined
Oct 28, 2008
Messages
9,737
Location
TX
Tbh I personally enjoy watching MK vs Anything at top level play. Dehf vs Brood was not as fun to watch as M2K vs Brood.
 

Flayl

Smash Hero
Joined
May 15, 2006
Messages
5,520
Location
Portugal
Olimar is never interesting to watch, you're all liars.

Actually I can say that for a lot of characters... And playstyles for other characters... Yeah now I remember why I stopped watching Brawl videos.
 

Metakill

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Jul 9, 2009
Messages
483
Location
#MangoNation
the only reason that we think about mk/snake is even is when Ally finally win a big tourney against m2k and then repeat and genesis.
I really think mk haven't even matchups, only a ditto.

lol i remember when the people think that kirby/mk was even lol
 

Sinister Slush

❄ I miss my kind ❄
Moderator
BRoomer
Joined
Sep 1, 2009
Messages
14,009
Location
The land that never Snows
NNID
SinisterSlush
Tbh I personally enjoy watching MK vs Anything at top level play. Dehf vs Brood was not as fun to watch as M2K vs Brood.
I agree IDK why but its more interesting.
Probably because you all want to see MK lose, rather than watch a non-MK win.
Basically this ^
I enjoy watching Meta Knights lose. Only thing I don't enjoy is Playing them... Especially with the starter list we have where we'll either go Smashville literally 95% of the time, or LC/BF.
Hell a tournament I just attended last week... I literally kept going to SV Game 1 and at one point got so annoyed by this I actually Striked SV to avoid playing on it.
 

Tesh

Smash Hero
Joined
Oct 28, 2008
Messages
9,737
Location
TX
the only reason that we think about mk/snake is even is when Ally finally win a big tourney against m2k and then repeat and genesis.
I really think mk haven't even matchups, only a ditto.

lol i remember when the people think that kirby/mk was even lol
and bowser
and yoshi
and zss
and puff
and ics
and rob
and sheik
and luigi
and dk (omg cuz he so heavy and he kill so urly when he not having trouble with the weather)
 

Reizilla

The Old Lapras and the Sea
Joined
Mar 20, 2008
Messages
13,676
Basically this ^
I enjoy watching Meta Knights lose. Only thing I don't enjoy is Playing them... Especially with the starter list we have where we'll either go Smashville literally 95% of the time, or LC/BF.
Hell a tournament I just attended last week... I literally kept going to SV Game 1 and at one point got so annoyed by this I actually Striked SV to avoid playing on it.
The hell didn't you strike Smashville against me for?!

And it's not like a bigger stage list would give Yoshi a better shot against MK. Just a less garbage stage than Smashville.
 

John12346

Smash Master
Joined
Jan 24, 2009
Messages
3,534
Location
New York, NY
NNID
JohnNumbers
The more I read these kinds of threads, the more tempted I get to start a movement to get some discussion on MK going.

It's like NO ONE has anything nice to say about him, srsly.
 

Sinister Slush

❄ I miss my kind ❄
Moderator
BRoomer
Joined
Sep 1, 2009
Messages
14,009
Location
The land that never Snows
NNID
SinisterSlush
Maybe if we take him out to dinner and talk about life outside his usual routine of stealing players money and tournament experience. We'll find a soft and gooey center inside that Purple Ball of Hate.
 

John12346

Smash Master
Joined
Jan 24, 2009
Messages
3,534
Location
New York, NY
NNID
JohnNumbers
Well, strictly speaking, he is just as mushy as Kirby is...

Gah, in either case, I really want to start something, but I have no idea how to start something as big as that... It doesn't help that the most important means of doing this, by posting on the forums, isn't allowed...
 
Joined
Mar 17, 2009
Messages
6,345
Location
New York, NY
3DS FC
5429-7210-5657
Banning Meta Knight was a good idea a year ago, two years ago, and now.

I think that even if someone beats MK, he should be banned because his design doesn't interact well with global mechanics.
 

Steam

Smash Hero
Joined
Aug 30, 2009
Messages
6,322
Location
Hell, Colorado
sadly though, the damage from MK not being banned has already been done. At this point I'm pretty sure 2/3 of the community mains him or subs him. and plenty of others have quit because of him... lol
 

BSP

Smash Legend
Joined
May 23, 2009
Messages
10,246
Location
Louisiana
That's why it's "too late" lol

banning him now makes most of the community lose their main or sub

Have you guys been looking at John#'s success thread? It's exactly like Steam said. He should be, but it doesn't have to, so it probably won't happen. Numbers don't lie though, and he is taking over this game. It's only halfway through the year and he's made about 3times as much as snake, plus more than falco, diddy, and snake combined lol
 

DMG

Smash Legend
Joined
Feb 12, 2006
Messages
18,958
Location
Waco
Slippi.gg
DMG#931
IDK about Singles, but I think banning him in teams is actually a feasible idea. MK is such a limiting character in teams, and I can't think of a single time that a national was won in the history of Brawl with a team other than MK + other character.
 

Flayl

Smash Hero
Joined
May 15, 2006
Messages
5,520
Location
Portugal
I remember it happening but I don't remember with who or when. Maybe Razer + Gnes?

10namesearch
 

DMG

Smash Legend
Joined
Feb 12, 2006
Messages
18,958
Location
Waco
Slippi.gg
DMG#931
Even then, that 1-2 times that probably consisted of Ally + top player (I think it was Ally and Larry?) is outdone by the number of nationals won by non MK. You could make the argument "Well hey Ally won Genesis / ADHD won SNES / Fiction won WGF / Gnes won MLG / etc" for singles, but there's no comparison for doubles at all really. Which is why I think you could feasibly ban him in teams.
 
Top Bottom