Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Lol, around dencember and before, I used to win like every meta ditto by spamming ftilt.I can say one main thing to this.
FTilt was the main move in this MU before some time.
Players got around the FTilt. So FTilt isnt the best move in this MU any more. The pro MK players now often dont get in situations to beeing hit by a ftilt.
More later.
Ftilt used to **** in MK dittos. I'm noticing that it gets less and less useful the more I ditto MKDon't f-tilt a lot? Am I playing a different game than other MK's? Ftilt is ****ing nasty, and ***** in MK dittos.
Down tilt is good, but I believe its best to mix up your approaches, because anything gets predictable.yes when i see my opponent rush in i always f-tilt and my spacing messes up and they shield grab me.
now when i see them rush in i will just short hop f-air.Do you think that's the best option?and
down tilt is like the best approach in dittos right?
Discuss Olimar like Master Raven said. I can't stand that ******Lucario is scheduled as next week's discussion, unless most people would like to discuss another match-up.
Next week's match-up has been changed to Olimar; let's stick to the MK mirror for now.As a matter of fact I believe the Olimar match-up should be changed to 55:45 MK. Meta needs to approach his opponents due to his lack of projectiles, and Olimar can easily use his fortress of pikmin to bat him away. The only reason I say MK still has the advantage is because MK can gimp him. But MK has to get him off the stage first.
If you think and act like this, then you will loose to M2K more often in the future, dojo. MU changed a bit. FAir approaching seems to work better than FTilt.Dthrow to reads.
Ftilts.
You win.
What happened? Did M2K get beat by a Ness player or something?lol we should discuss ness after what happened yesterday
They can just Fair that or something...MT is good as an unpredictable move. With correct timing, the opponent can't react to it, but you also have to know how to perform it so they can't get out or that you're moving away as they get their chance to hit you back. Just ask Sean I guess. Also it's a good recovery if they're offstage below you, where they can only reach you with the ineffective Shuttle Loop. Not a good edgeguard though.Nado is good for edgeguarding.
They can just Fair that or something...MT is good as an unpredictable move. With correct timing, the opponent can't react to it, but you also have to know how to perform it so they can't get out or that you're moving away as they get their chance to hit you back. Just ask Sean I guess. Also it's a good recovery if they're offstage below you, where they can only reach you with the ineffective Shuttle Loop. Not a good edgeguard though.
Vids or it didn't happen.....FOW, a 13 year old Ness player, beat Tyrant (MK) in bracket and took a game off M2K at Smash In Nevada yesterday.
1. M2K
2. SK92
3. DieSuperFly
4. FoW
5. Tyrant
5. Havok
7. Z
7. DEHF
Not many know this, but Ness is good vs MK. The Match is 60:40. Ness has high priority aerials, and his dair is like a magnet vs MK. All of his aerials are really good, and a back-throw @ like 110 will KO MK. I was actually thinking of switching to Ness vs MK. I may now because of FOW's performance. This goes to show you that Ness is actually viable vs MK.Vids or it didn't happen.....
![]()