Continuing off a post
Champion of Hyrule
made about the Masked Man a few days ago...
I don't get why people say a third EarthBound rep
has to be an antagonist. In fact, if there's any series that needs absolutely ZERO playable villains it's Mother - almost every major villain in the series has some tragic and harrowingly realistic story to them that makes them a ridiculous if not irresponsible pick for a flashy and colourful fighting game with Banjo-Kazooie and Pac-Man in it.
Ridley and Ganondorf are evil just because they are, Mewtwo and Sephiroth were unethical cloning experiments (dark, but unrealistic) and then Mr. Minch over here is evil because he spent his whole childhood being verbally and physically abused by his deadbeat parents, which the protagonist of his debut unknowingly contributed to. Don't even get me started on that poor poor Masked Man, or Giegue for that matter.
I guess it must derive from this strange mentality that SSBU is "heroes vs. villains" themed, even though that has never been officially stated or even implied. Prior to the fake leak that planted that idea in people's heads I saw Kumatora and Poo mentioned as 3rd Mother reps
way more than Porky.
Like, yeah, I get Porky has cool lasers and a spider-mech, but he's also an overgrown immortal child who was driven to comitting genocide by years of abuse and alien brainwashing, then ultimately faced
a fate worse than death all the while still having the mind and mentality of a child. Having dark villains in Smash is fine, but you need to take responsibility with roster picks at some point.
All I really remember is when I first saw the character and thought it was some horrific Bart Simpson bootleg.