Honestly, the contract that the players are agreeing to when entering MLG is really stupid. I'm not arguing that m2k and ADHD did not break any rules, but rather that the rules they broke are extremely stupid and unprofessional. Is it really in the contract to 'play to the best of your ability and not intentionally forfeit a match?' That is soooooo dumb. You can't just force someone to play to the best of their ability. What if someone in the top 8 just doesn't feel like playing anymore? They get to their match and are worn out so they give up, or obviously sandbag to lose. Do they not get their prize money anymore? What if they actually have a legit reason for not wanting to play? What if they got a call that their mom died? Of course that's an extreme example, but someone in that situation would still be 'intentionally' forfeiting a match. Of course the obvious answer people will give is that there is some kind of line where it's ok to drop out of a tournament. But the problem with saying that is it's impossible to say where the line is drawn. Sure, maybe dropping out of a tournament because your mom died is an obviously legit reason to not play. But what about more in between cases. What if you're sick? Tired? Who's to say that m2k's reasons for not wanting to play aren't legit?
I agree with just about everyone that it's gay as hell when players in a large national tournament decide to split or just don't play their best. I can even see why some people would lose respect for players who split or forfeit. It makes the tournament way less hype, and for MLG it draws a lot of the attention and sponsoring away. But the fact of the matter remains that the player is still the one holding the controller. If he decides to lose, that's his own decision. Any decision made by MLG after that to 'punish' him for his performance in a tournament just seems plain arbitrary and unprofessional.
The next thing many of you will say is that this is different because money is on the line. Even though ADHD never gave m2k any money in this situation (and this lack of money does make this situation different), let's just assume that he did. So ADHD gives m2k $300. So what? Can ADHD not choose to use his money how he pleases? Is it illegal for ADHD to give someone some money? ADHD beat m2k. Even if m2k forfeited or sandbagged, ADHD still won the match. ADHD should be able to do whatever he wants with his winnings, even if that means giving some of it to m2k. It might 'destroy' the competitive spirit, but he's still entitled to spend his money how he wants, and if MLG wants to punish him for doing what he wants with his money, that just seems stupid. Sure MLG can make whatever rules they want for who they allow into their tournaments, but barring ADHD and m2k is arbitrary and unprofessional.
The bottom line is that, yes, splitting and forfeiting are really anti-competitive and hype-killing and players should be encouraged not to do it and perhaps scorned when they do, but it's still they're decision to play to whatever ability they feel like playing to and to do whatever they want with their winnings.