So why is it a silly argument? Enlighten me rather than just simply saying I'm wrong. And why is it so sad for someone respected or talented to vote yes?
I am outright saying that MK is not broken, but he's dumb / un balanced enough to banned, just like items such as food/bumpers are not broken but dumb enough to be banned. That's my argument literally dumbed down and I don't believe I've yet to a good reason against it other than 'get better', which is much the same argument Evo used in the defense of items in their tournaments. I was anti MK ban until I went back on old forum posts here and read through items vs no items debates, and saw that they are nearly, nearly identical to this MK debate we are having now with people claiming they are unbalanced and others claiming that they just need to learn to use them and get better.
I don't agree with you. That's all.
You think MK is as stupid as items and detracts from the competitiveness of Brawl, correct? I don't agree with that.
-Meta Knight does not add an extreme amount of pure luck to the game.
-Meta Knight can't randomly kill you at any percent based on luck.
-Meta Knight, contrary to what many of you many think, does have at least one bad match and then several ones where he goes even or only wins very sliggtly, making him perfectly beatable. You need to sit down and look at how effective a camping Snake or Olimar can be against Meta Knight, as well as characters like Diddy and Game and Watch if they don't make lots of mistakes and play safely.
I don't think Meta Knight detracts from the competitiveness of Brawl. I think he
adds to it because he's the best character and forces people to actually play well and think to win. Who cares if you mess up against a character like Toon Link or Pit? You won't get punished that harshly, despite those characters being pretty good. If you mess up against MK, you can potentially get death combo'd, gimped, etc., so you have to actually stay safe and not go "lol it's brawl so ill just do stuff cuz i wont rly be punished that harshly due to no combozzzz lololol." Of course, messing up against something like Dedede or Snake is obviously worse........
Honestly, it's like...this one clique that's against the ban and then hordes of people for it and then random sporadic people who say yes or no based on personal opinion.
What? The amount voting "yes" isn't that much higher.
I looked at the poll, and despite the "Yes" section having more votes, there are more staff members, TOs, and other higher-status players in the "No" section. That's something to keep in mind.