demonictoonlink
Smash Master
Can we just close this now? It's going nowhere...
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Did they beat his DDD? CO18 has beaten it in a MM but I don't remember him beating it in tourney. When did Hbox beat Seibrik's DDD as well?Actually this is wrong
Co18 + Hungrybox both beat him before he went MK
it's because people's spatial and image recognition are at an extreme short term (get it? Set it and forget it!). players consistently fall for snake's traps very often and they john about it, where in reality it's their own fault for going into thatI was playing Lambchops and MVD (a new up and coming Snake main in FL) in friendlies yesterday and after finishing our sets, I'm not suspicious of M2K getting blatantly hit by Ally's Fair on Halberd or running into explosives any longer. Sometimes **** like that just happens, 'cause I got spiked by Chops (I actually have a replay of it) and I think MVD as well, even when I was trying to retaliate them. I also ran into a few explosives. Sometimes you just don't realize they're there, or you forget about them.
I was referring to this.Actually this is wrong
Co18 + Hungrybox both beat him before he went MK
I always knew Yuna was a ******That's no girl; that's Yuna.
And yes he is confused.
Pro-ban people never had a platform. Whining and complaining about how they got beat by a mk their last tourney is not a platform.People find it helpful to have a second for Metaknight...???!!! But that destroys the pro-bans entire platform...
Not really, their intent was to create a ban criteria. The thing was, the fact that they did this as a result of MK colored their perceptions about what was bannable, and rendered their criteria suspect. Furthermore, they had no existing criteria to reference to because they dismissed Sirlin (because it didn't fit).Pro-ban people never had a platform. Whining and complaining about how they got beat by a mk their last tourney is not a platform.
Are you familiar with long wave radiation and the increase in carbon dioxide's effects on it's retention?LOL GLOBAL WARMING
Fixed. =DI could beat sebrik If I got BETTER
Which part of FL?seibrik dominates florida
All of it.Which part of FL?
Well I live near Orlando and I've been trying to keep up with Tournament spots around me. Granted I've only been competitive from the start of this month but I want to be aware/meet people who are supposedly "DOMINATING" my State.All of it.
edit:
Except Tampa.
Son's too scared to come to Tampa. =PPPPP
It should have been locked along time ago.Can this be locked now...?
We are seriously just making fun of pro-bans now...Even though I do enjoy it^^
Pro-Ban: "Meta Knight dominates all major tournaments!"um... can someone explain to me why one guy winning one tournament in a completely nondominant (though incredibly exciting) manner suddenly means "proban loses"?
If you stopped playing Brawl, why do you bother to come here and post in this thread, then?jeez, you guys haven't changed a bit since the day i stopped playing brawl. antiban posters just refuse to accept anything and just spend all their time rubbing each other's nuts.
Mew2King has lost several times, and it's not because of Mew2King losing, either, but mainly about Meta Knight players not dominating and utterly ****** APEX.honestly, what the ****? m2k loses for the first time since like the turn of the ****ing century and all of a sudden mk is perfectly fine? i mean, i'm not even proban necessarily (i'm on the fence), that's just an incredibly stupid argument to make.
maybe if you have read part of the argument on the past few pages you would know that there is much more than what you just posted regarding anti ban argumentsum... can someone explain to me why one guy winning one tournament in a completely nondominant (though incredibly exciting) manner suddenly means "proban loses"?
jeez, you guys haven't changed a bit since the day i stopped playing brawl. antiban posters just refuse to accept anything and just spend all their time rubbing each other's nuts.
honestly, what the ****? m2k loses for the first time since like the turn of the ****ing century and all of a sudden mk is perfectly fine? i mean, i'm not even proban necessarily (i'm on the fence), that's just an incredibly stupid argument to make.
Don't feed the troll.Pro-Ban: "Meta Knight dominates all major tournaments!"
A major tournament happens, Meta Knight doesn't dominate.
If you stopped playing Brawl, why do you bother to come here and post in this thread, then?
And yes, why should we accept and agree to reasoning that either are not validating a ban or disqualifies itself by also requiring banning other things?
I know. You know what? Let's ban Meta Knight because he's a masked Mexican puffball. That's a valid ban reason.
Mew2King has lost several times, and it's not because of Mew2King losing, either, but mainly about Meta Knight players not dominating and utterly ****** APEX.
Not feeding him. Dismantling him with facts. He might be only delusioned.Don't feed the troll.
thats like not feeding animals at the zoo,its not that i am comparing trolls to animals,but its just that its too hard to resist.Don't feed the troll.
that's a pretty shoddy argument, imo. see bottom of this post.Pro-Ban: "Meta Knight dominates all major tournaments!"
A major tournament happens, Meta Knight doesn't dominate.
i'm just visiting. i haven't been here in months and just wanted to stop in and see what was going on. turns out, it's the same old stupid ****.If you stopped playing Brawl, why do you bother to come here and post in this thread, then?
that's my point exactly. there are plenty of arguments that show exactly how mk poisons the metagame, but you just dismiss it all. you will not accept anything. i'm willing to grant that mk is not "ban worthy," i don't understand why it's so hard for you guys to admit that this is a very contentious issue and that in some ways mk is an unfair character (though still not ban worthy). but no, all i have ever seen is "lol proban never had an argument" or "hahaha let's laugh at the proban kids some more," etc etc etc. it reminds of the way little kids try to win an argument; they just get louder, use a condescending tone of voice, and try to twist and minimize everything the other side says.And yes, why should we accept and agree to reasoning that either are not validating a ban or disqualifies itself by also requiring banning other things?
I know. You know what? Let's ban Meta Knight because he's a masked Mexican puffball. That's a valid ban reason.
i was using hyperbole. and that still begs the question, why is this about apex? mk has been dominating the scene for about a year, but now the whole argument rests on one tournament? and ally and lain were not around when i still played brawl, making them relative unknowns compared to m2k, yet they both beat him at apex; and when you consider the fact that he has only lost a set once within the past 6 months (according to some guy in the apex thread, forgive me if that's not accurate) that almost suggests to me that it might have just "not been m2k's day."Mew2King has lost several times, and it's not because of Mew2King losing, either, but mainly about Meta Knight players not dominating and utterly ****** APEX.
Don't feed the troll.
Not feeding him. Dismantling him with facts. He might be only delusioned.
If he continues trolling, I'll just leave him be.
this is exactly what i'm talking about. i ask one question about your completely *** backwards logic, and all of a sudden i'm a troll. one question. one completely reasonable question, and i'm suddenly a "troll" in need of "dismantling with facts." pff. give me a ****ing break.thats like not feeding animals at the zoo,its not that i am comparing trolls to animals,but its just that its too hard to resist.
You mean, yours? If you're actually interested in just an answer to your question, your other post would've been fine. No need to add on to that by calling everyone out on being mean to you.i blame yuna for this ****ty attitude.
EDIT: and the overbearing sense of self importance. i blame yuna for that too.
This.All the best arguments were made in the first 70-80 pages. The good pro-ban arguments. The good anti-ban arguments. Continuing to post any argument for either is pointless in my opinion.
Hell, back then we were going in circles. Now this is basically a +1 thread. The thing is, due to the nature of this thread, posting, "Ban Meta!" or "Don't ban him!" makes the post non-spam. You'd mind as well put "+1" in your posts in this thread. Hide it with the #212121 font.
Oh, ya. I remain neutral to the ban of Metaknight. Do it or don't do it. I've learned the Meta Match-up in and out, so I have no real issue with it any more. (That, and Diddy)
+1