Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
....this guythink .... think .... brain blast!
Mens tennis is more competitive because men are much better. They hit faster, they are more accurate, their balls have more spin and they are lower over the net. If the word 'competitive' doesn't describe this, then i'm sorry for misusing the word.
what you are describing is men being better at tennis than women arecom·pet·i·tive [kuhm-pet-i-tiv]
adjective
1. of, pertaining to, involving, or decided by competition (competitive sports; a competitive examination.)
2. well suited for competition; having a feature that makes for successful competition (a competitive price.)
3. having a strong desire to compete or to succeed.
i hope you aren't using this as a reason sveet is right. melee grand finals was dull to many, doesn't make it any less competitive than any of the other top few matches. and when was the last time you saw a top player of any sport not choke. **** happens, people mess up, that doesn't make them any less competitive.Sveet is right. Women's tennis is pretty dull in the most part. Some match ups are interesting but they seem to choke more often too.
Why are you getting involved? Do you watch tennis?i hope you aren't using this as a reason sveet is right. melee grand finals was dull to many, doesn't make it any less competitive than any of the other top few matches. and when was the last time you saw a top player of any sport not choke. **** happens, people mess up, that doesn't make them any less competitive.
hell, some high school/college players can be just as competitive as pro sports players
tl;dr being competitive =/=being skilled
Because sexism is stupid, and wrong?Why are you getting involved? Do you watch tennis?
The games are less interesting to me (and many others, perhaps even objectively so), which is what sveet meant by competitive.
Worst. Argument. Ever.Why are you getting involved? Do you watch tennis?
The games are less interesting to me (and many others, perhaps even objectively so), which is what sveet meant by competitive.
Stop acting like you dont find some of the men attractive.Woman's tennis = slower play by far but better eye candy because of the skirts and the women.
Man's tennis = crazy creative and faster plays most of the time but nothing much to look at physically.. but in the Peach boards it seemed like it would be better eye candy here. The upsides of the woman's tennis become the upside of man's tennis, yes? lol.
This is probably the same sentiment that made sure women's tennis didnt receive the same amount of prize money for years.I would say anything that is done better is more interesting than something that is attempting to do the same thing but is done less good
Shall we compare Apex GFs to, say, mid-level Foxco vs. Falcon/Marth?I would say anything that is done better is more interesting than something that is attempting to do the same thing but is done less good
You should go watch the video of Kim Clijsters returning Rod****'s serve, she does a decent job. I'd also love to see Serena (now) vs someone in the ATPs top 100.None of the rules are different in women's tennis as far as i know (besides number of sets played in certain matches). If the top 10 women played in the PTA, they would struggle to make top 50. I think thats proof that it is done "less good".
however, i disagree with this. women's tennis IS being done less well than men's tennis, because a top rated man could defeat a top rated woman the vast majority of the time. men are simply better at the game, mostly due to physiological characteristics.Women's tennis utilizes the same fundamentals, but has its own game that caters to the women's physique. To state that its being done "less good" then men's tennis is pretty rude.
I need you to clarify what you mean by "being done less well" because it sounds like you're sexist or ignorant (or both).however, i disagree with this. women's tennis IS being done less well than men's tennis, because a top rated man could defeat a top rated woman the vast majority of the time. men are simply better at the game, mostly due to physiological characteristics.
tennis is a competitive game. how well someone is playing can be directly determined by their performance at the game.I need you to clarify what you mean by "being done less well" because it sounds like you're sexist or ignorant (or both).
Men are better at tennis for the sole fact that men are physically superior to women. This is why the game is split into to versions: men's tennis and women's tennis. Women's tennis cant be doing "less well" then men's tennis because they're not the same thing.
So like I said, either im lost or you're dumb, and since im me and you're you imma go with the latter.
is there any significant difference in the rulesets other than number of sets?Why are you lumping both games into simply tennis? The WTA and ATP exist for a reason.
You cant say that the women's game sucks simply because they dont hit as hard as the men, or as fast as the men.
Must be a texas straight people thing.All I'm saying is if I wanted to watch two people trying to outstall each other I'd go home and watch my parents try to stave off divorce
Alan i like ur avatar
also **** a sizable chunk of the socal community
ESPECIALLY blowjobs. omgAlso, men are better than women at everything. Including blowjobs.