Smooth Criminal
Da Cheef
Now, I've seen this being bandied about by the community for about two years now. Is it because one can combo the other so easily?and falcon marth is DEF even
Smooth Criminal
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Now, I've seen this being bandied about by the community for about two years now. Is it because one can combo the other so easily?and falcon marth is DEF even
Also Falcon has a way of getting in which is very important because most characters don't.Now, I've seen this being bandied about by the community for about two years now. Is it because one can combo the other so easily?
Smooth Criminal
Those people who think tournament results are the most important thing are sure to have lots of complaints >.>Basically, I think Marth is worse because Sheik exists.
Any questions, comments, complaints, etc?
I mean, it's not like Marth is devoid of strange matchups with worse characters where he loses or struggles (like Falco). The only one that I can think of is like Falcon, but I hear some weird people think Ganon goes even with Marth so that might warrant some thought too.
M2K also thinks so. Or said so. At some point. I don't know how much he believes or if he's changed his mind yet, though, Mr. Zimmerman is a hard one to figure out.just bc ganon rivals marths silly range with a couple moves doesnt make em even but kage thinks so
My friend always sidesteps it or Dairs me on the way down.But oh wait he doesn't because Falco players aren't mindlessly attacking into Samus Up+bs any longer.
****it, my argument can't fit into that form without sounding ********no, not really mogwai, not really, no.
Its a ratio of the match up.what's the difference between 55-45 and 60-40? if they play 20 games, one game will have a different outcome?
i don't really get where "chance" comes into play... smash is mostly deterministic isn't itIts a ratio of the match up.
So lets say we have Fox vs Kirby.
The match up is 9:1 in Fox's favor.
So that means there is a 9 to 1 chance that Fox will beat Kirby.
Its quite similar to horse races if you know how that works.
The likely chance that Kirby will beat Fox is not likely at all.i don't really get where "chance" comes into play... smash is mostly deterministic isn't it
This shouldn't be the FINAL MELEE TIER LIST because you are right, the metagame is still evolving. As kirbykaze mentioned earlier, Falco is now starting to do much better against Marth than what was a year ago, considered a **** matchup. People are claiming Jiggs deserves a bump up, while I personally disagree with this, it just goes to show that nothing in this game is set in stone, and strategies are still evolving and changing.Is this really going to be the last ssbm tier list ever? Growing up, I was told that the metagame is ever changing, and everyone keeps getting better. It's kind of a sad thought that we aren't going to change this again just because brawl came out...
Marth has that circle of gay, where it makes it soooooo hard to approach him, not to mention his range and priority, which just makes things worse for Falcon.I approve of that sig
and shut up m2k
marth ***** falcon
60-40
CHANCE IS ALWAYS THERE.what do you mean "chance" though?
if both marth and kirby are at the top of their games, marth will beat kirby 100% of the time... is that matchup 100:0?
maybe you are saying items are involved? sorry, I'm just not getting where this concept of "chance" comes in