Kink-Link5
Smash Hero
Bowser is overrated. Only character with bad matchups against 26 characters in the game and he's somehow considered not as bad as Fake Fake Fox and ledge grab mcgoo.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
See, this has always and always will be a touchy thing for me.1 sample isn't good enough to move a character up the tier list. If he's the only one capable to do it and all the other Pikachus can't even get to the brackets then it says something about the character.. rather than Fox where you see tons of them in brackets.
pikachu has a higher skill cap than yoshi IMO. he's mad good though, but only 1 guy has been able to bring out his potential so far.What's peoples opinion of pikachu now that axe is f***in everyone up
I mean, it's impossible for marth to win
i've been saying this for years and lots of people are uncomfortable with the idea...You can improve just by improving your tech skill with a space animal, where as it's harder to improve alone with other characters, as you are limited by things such as experience in situations or intelligence (without tech skill being as great of a factor)
yeah i'm gonna have to say that's more because of fox's popularity compared to pikachu. on average if you have a ton of people playing a character you have a higher chance of a top/high level player using them than if only a few are, so the potential of the character isn't seen as often.1 sample isn't good enough to move a character up the tier list. If he's the only one capable to do it and all the other Pikachus can't even get to the brackets then it says something about the character.. rather than Fox where you see tons of them in brackets.
And yet somehow Falcon ended up in the top 7 spot.we're playing a game where most characters have 0, 1, or 2 top level representative(s). the skill of individual players means more than the characters they're using at that point
theory has to play a far bigger role than usual when creating tier lists for Melee
agreed.we're playing a game where most characters have 0, 1, or 2 top level representative(s). the skill of individual players means more than the characters they're using at that point
theory has to play a far bigger role than usual when creating tier lists for Melee
You wouldn't say Puff or ICs?don't tell me fox does better vs sheik, cuz that is some total bull****. Fox sheik is like even, where as falco is sheik's worst MU.
if you believe that people tend to favor playing stronger characters then the relative volume means a quite a bitSee, this has always and always will be a touchy thing for me.
If you have 100 Fox players at a tournament and 1 of them makes top 5-10. Vs 1 Pika player and 1 Pika player makes top 5-10. Is there really a statement being made 1 way or the other?
Did this line confuse the **** out of anyone else?my fox has, between friendlies and tourney, 2-3 stocked javi/unknown/jman/mango's fox's THIS YEAR, in sheik vs fox
From context and the rest of the post, I'm pretty sure he meant his Sheik. But yeah, I initially was confused too.Did this line confuse the **** out of anyone else?
I agree with M2K that it's a popularity contest to an extent. Combined with being known as the best character in the game both in theory and according to the past few tier lists and I'd say that helps explain why fox is so popular. On top of that he does really cool flashy stuff. There is literally a flash when he shines...if you believe that people tend to favor playing stronger characters then the relative volume means a quite a bit
I'm not convinced peach is better than marth, but she might be since she's good at some important MUs (falco/ICs/less-bad-vs-sheik)
what is lifedon't tell me fox does better vs sheik, cuz that is some total bull****. Fox sheik is like even, where as falco is sheik's worst MU.
I don't disagree but some have a valid argument for Falcon...I mean...I personally don't see how Falcon could be that go yet...He's been doing overall better than Marth for like....4 years? (minus your own placings of course).Marth is better than Falcon overall man. That's no contest, at all. I don't even think it's that close. Falcon's only super good when he can Uair-destroy his opponent. MUs he can't do that he is much worse. He struggles vs the top 3 in the game for this very reason, and is good vs the rest but when you struggle vs the top 3 characters in the game that is a major flaw imo.
Also puff is underrated. hax ***** me in 2 falcon dittos this weekend and then i won the rest of the set with puff (4 stocked by planking immediately after getting the % lead) and sheik (3/1 stock normal matches). Makes me feel falcon is even more overrated and puff/sheik are underrated by a little bit each (esp puff).
Everything Jason says confuses the **** out of me.Did this line confuse the **** out of anyone else?
^thisJiggs planking when done right is a legitimately gamebreaking tactic that needs to be banned
Falcon is not better than Marth lol. Marth is significantly better vs both spacies, better vs Puff, they have about the same matchup vs Sheik (Falcon might be slightly better at it), Falcon is slightly better vs Peach, and Marth vs Falcon is even.
Those smashboards legends know Marth is such a terrible char. Don't even dare to try make Marth sound like a better char then he is.Jiggs planking when done right is a legitimately gamebreaking tactic that needs to be banned
Falcon is not better than Marth lol. Marth is significantly better vs both spacies, better vs Puff, they have about the same matchup vs Sheik (Falcon might be slightly better at it), Falcon is slightly better vs Peach, and Marth vs Falcon is even.