unknown522
Some guy
Working on it
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I'm not sure what you're getting at... I don't think anyone's saying Fox isn't amazing, just that he's not this near-invincible character everyone once thought he was a few years ago and that he does have flaws.*sigh*
Then let's put Fox below Peach, Falco, and Puff, because there isn't any Fox main consistently ****** with him.
This is ridiculous.
maybe just maybe thinks about playing around with marth again hmmm...... well after 5 long seconds i have decided New Jersey has to many birds and i am tired of dealing with it using marth so gonna try sheik, fox and peach all fun that is why i play to have fun if i make money cool.Taj beat PP and Mango's Falcos at Genesis 2, which is kind of neat.
Maybe Marth isn't beyond awful vs Falco.
don't forget about matchup knowledgeMarth > Falco > Fox > Young Link > Jiggs > Peach > Marth
ShroudedOne: absurd strawmanning isn't gonna help you but I agree at least partially. people underrate the fact that players are often separated heavily by skill and not character choice.
if i knew anything about it i would in exchange for some friendlies eventually i have so much damn time on my handscan someone help me with my art appreciation take home midterm? LOL
Alright, I get it now. I mean granted, results shouldn't be the only thing that go into factoring whether a character is better than another or not like a few people are suggesting, but they should be a decent factor as its the only way of seeing how all the theories pan out in reality. Top results are kind of iffy though because skill is going to be the great divider over character choice, but I mean looking at how many of such and such character made brackett at a large tourney compared to the overall popularity of the character I think is a good indicator sometimes.Well, Warhawk, since no Fox mains are placing well, he must not be better than the characters who place above him, right? So Falco, Peach, and Puff are all better, because tournaments are the only things that matter, and we must take those results at face value.
Duh.
Quoting and bolding this because it is the best thing posted in this thread in the past week.What has Marth done AT ALL since the metagame has gotten more advanced? What evidence is there that he is undeveloped? Is it possible that Marth, the character with the MOST success for the first 5 years of this game, was completely figured out? Not just in terms of his efficiency, but also how to fight against him? Is it also possible, that characters like Jiggs and Peach, who have NOT had Top Level representation up until recently, could in fact be BETTER than him?
God this would make so many people happy.my marth i think was super **** and i could prolly bring him back strong if i really put the time into it and had godlike controllers like before.
I've said this a decently number of times as well, but it seems armada himself (and leffen) has joined the whole "armada can't beat hbox with peach" when he was always close to in their matches.Maybe I'm wrong, but I thought Armada did quite well against Hungrybox except for like 1 match whenever they played Puff vs Peach. Still lost but from what I saw from Armada it seemed doable, just difficult.
There are players that I ALWAYS only just lose to.I've said this a decently number of times as well, but it seems armada himself (and leffen) has joined the whole "armada can't beat hbox with peach" when he was always close to in their matches.
IIRC he was even a full stock ahead before he got rested (which is fair enough, but i'm guessing armada won't be rested every match) in the first match of that apex 2010 set. I've always thought that it was silly to judge how close a set was, purely based on how many matches the individual players won. Getting 3-0'd (twice too), doesn't neccesarily mean you lost big. You could be one hit away from winning every single one of those games.
Guess it's hard for me to judge how far off he is from being able to taking it compared to the man himself, but from what i've watched, alot of people seem to overreact on the matchup (between the two players).
What point is he trying to prove?There's definitely a skill gap between armada and hbox, but the lop-sided matchup gives hbox the edge.
I know that he's pretty confident about being able to beat armada's peach as well. Armada is also going o go peach vs hbox at the next national to prove a point (I personally don't want him to do that. Unless he actually thought that he could beat him or something). He posted that in the falco boards a few weeks ago
So they are more clutch than you? Or do you think that you really just always will just lose to them and the matchup is absolutely impossible for you?There are players that I ALWAYS only just lose to.
I really don't think there is. Did you see Hungrybox at Apex?There's definitely a skill gap between armada and hbox
I'm pretty sure Armada doesn't give a **** about proving points to whiny nobodies on the internet. Armada plays to win.Armada is also going o go peach vs hbox at the next national to prove a point
If there is a skill gap it is not that big unless this is just another example of people snubbing Hungrybox's skill just because he uses Puff.There's definitely a skill gap between armada and hbox, but the lop-sided matchup gives hbox the edge.
I know a lot of people here agree that Marth isn't as hot as we initially thought, but that's pushing it. Are you seriously rolling him in the same tier as Bowser, Roy, Pichu etc.?Personally in thinking about a tier list this is what I think (not even joking). In this game, there are characters that have a shine. After that, there's also a character that has a rest.
After that there's everyone else.