• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Official BBR Tier List v5

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jar.

Smash Cadet
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
46
Location
Katy, Texas
So, would more people agree with something like this?

S: Meta Knight
A: Snake, Diddy Kong, Falco, Ice Climbers, Olimar
B: Wario, Marth, Pikachu, King Dedede, Lucario, Fox
C: Zero Suit Samus, Toon Link, Kirby, Pit, R.O.B., Peach, Sonic
D: Donkey Kong, Wolf, Luigi, Ike, Sheik, Pokémon Trainer, Yoshi
E: Bowser, Ness, Lucas, Mario, Samus, Zelda
F: Link, Captain Falcon, Jigglypuff, Ganondorf
Where did GW go? D:
 

fkacyan

Smash Hero
Joined
Mar 15, 2008
Messages
6,226
I also support including Japan's results, but that is completely untrue, SCN.

There is no doubt that a stagelist will have an effect on how strong a certain character is. Japan uses a different stagelist, but nobody is discounting them because their results are invalidated by an inferior stagelist. It's implied that the tier list we are attempting to construct is based on a more "North American" stage list. Is it really unjustified to give less weight to results from Japan because of this?
I'm fairly certain the implication by almost everybody is that their stagelist is inferior to ours. Maybe not you, but almost everybody else.

If people want to construct regional tierlists and not global tierlists (Because a match can go to the same stages as on the Japanese ruleset), then what should be done is a by-stage tierlist which can then be averaged based on the stagelist in question.

The community is far too lazy to do the right thing, though.
 

OverLade

Smash Hero
Joined
Jun 19, 2006
Messages
8,225
Location
Tampa, FL
@Redhalberd the gap between Trevonte and TKD isnt that big.
I don't know anything about Trevonte. Lets be real. How big of a skill gap is there between someone who can 2 stock low percent Tyrant and someone I've never heard of. TKD is basically an M2K level player who uses a character with weaknesses. Trevonte is really good, so are Zeton and other top foxes but there's still no comparison...

Also I think Marth is better than Pika and Wario there just arent enough good marths.
 

Ussi

Smash Legend
Joined
Mar 9, 2008
Messages
17,147
Location
New Jersey (South T_T)
3DS FC
4613-6716-2183
Oops i always think of American results but not Europe.

Well with Europe yea Marth's results are better.

But even then without Europe. There are more good Marth players than Pikachu players.

:phone:
 

T-block

B2B TST
Joined
Jan 11, 2009
Messages
11,841
Location
Edmonton, AB, Canada
The creation of a tier list has enough variables as it is... there's already a huge grey area when it comes to how stages should come into play when evaluating a character. Do we consider all legal stages equally, or do we consider stages with counterpicking in mind? etc. etc. So we restrict ourselves to one stagelist, and I think that's fair. Then when we look at Japan's results, we note that things will be skewed due to the difference in legal stages, and evaluate them as such.

Conversely, the tier list would not accurately represent Japan's metagame, and we're okay with that.

It's not about being lazy... it's about imposing necessary constraints to give a solid enough structure to move forward with the project.

Your idea is an interesting one though...
 

zeldasmash

Smash Lord
Joined
Jan 26, 2010
Messages
1,994
Location
Puerto Rico
So, would more people agree with something like this?

S: :metaknight:
A: :snake:, :diddy:, :falco:, :popo:, :olimar:
B: :wario:, :marth:, :pikachu2:, :dedede:, :lucario:, :gw: ,:fox:
C: :zerosuitsamus:, :toonlink:, :kirby2:, :pit:, :rob:., :peach:, :sonic:
D: :dk2:, :wolf:, :luigi2:, :ike:, :sheilda:, :sheik:, :pt:, :yoshi2:
E: :bowser2:, :ness2:, :lucas:, :mario2:, :samus2:, :zelda:
F: :link2:, :falcon:, :jigglypuff:, :ganondorf:
Link and Zelda switch (she is also too high). Ness, Mario, Lucas and Samus (imo) are better than Bowser. Mario and Lucas should be tied. Wolf and DK are too low. Where is GAW and Sheilda? (note i put them in this list)
 

Steam

Smash Hero
Joined
Aug 30, 2009
Messages
6,322
Location
Hell, Colorado
the reason it's hard to consider both America and Europe is that the metagames rarely interact... who knows, maybe the European marths would still place meh in the US like the US ones... Maybe they would do good. but you can't assume anything :/

but yes if you include European Results then you must include Japan. lolimar.
 

fkacyan

Smash Hero
Joined
Mar 15, 2008
Messages
6,226
The creation of a tier list has enough variables as it is... there's already a huge grey area when it comes to how stages should come into play when evaluating a character. Do we consider all legal stages equally, or do we consider stages with counterpicking in mind? etc. etc. So we restrict ourselves to one stagelist, and I think that's fair. Then when we look at Japan's results, we note that things will be skewed due to the difference in legal stages, and evaluate them as such.

Conversely, the tier list would not accurately represent Japan's metagame, and we're okay with that.

It's not about being lazy... it's about imposing necessary constraints to give a solid enough structure to move forward with the project.

Your idea is an interesting one though...
I proposed such an idea right when the matchup chart was first released, and Captains of Stagestry Raziek and BPC called the idea "immensely impractical" and "something that will never actually get finished."

They're more than willing to randomly test stages, though.
 

T-block

B2B TST
Joined
Jan 11, 2009
Messages
11,841
Location
Edmonton, AB, Canada
I'm curious.

So you would have a list for an only-Battlefield stagelist, an only-FD stagelist, etc.? Then depending on the stagelist used, somehow compile the lists from the legal stages?

How would you account for counterpicking then? I think this might actually give too much weight to stages...
 

fkacyan

Smash Hero
Joined
Mar 15, 2008
Messages
6,226
I'm curious.

So you would have a list for an only-Battlefield stagelist, an only-FD stagelist, etc.? Then depending on the stagelist used, somehow compile the lists from the legal stages?

How would you account for counterpicking then? I think this might actually give too much weight to stages...
You would make a matchup chart on a per-stage basis.

Arguably you'd have two charts in the end: A starter chart, and a counterpick chart (Which obviously includes the starters).

The end result would be that people would know a lot more about their character's actual traits, and not the stupid-*** gimmick bull**** most character boards spend their time on, more about the other characters, and more about how stages work. Really, it's just the big matchup chart but looked at on a stage-by-stage basis.

It would just take a long time and a lot of input.

It would also show which stages are actually closest to being neutral.
 

T-block

B2B TST
Joined
Jan 11, 2009
Messages
11,841
Location
Edmonton, AB, Canada
You would make a matchup chart on a per-stage basis.

Arguably you'd have two charts in the end: A starter chart, and a counterpick chart (Which obviously includes the starters).

The end result would be that people would know a lot more about their character's actual traits, and not the stupid-*** gimmick bull**** most character boards spend their time on, more about the other characters, and more about how stages work. Really, it's just the big matchup chart but looked at on a stage-by-stage basis.

It would just take a long time and a lot of input.
So...you're saying add a third dimension to the matchup chart. We have MK-Snake-Battlefield, MK-Snake-Halberd, etc. etc. Are we then okay with creating a tier list only from matchups?

It would also show which stages are actually closest to being neutral.
This is exactly why I'm interested in this atm...
 

fkacyan

Smash Hero
Joined
Mar 15, 2008
Messages
6,226
So...you're saying add a third dimension to the matchup chart. We have MK-Snake-Battlefield, MK-Snake-Halberd, etc. etc. Are we then okay with creating a tier list only from matchups?
Bingo!

All a tier list really actually is is an evaluation of the threat level of various characters in tourney, which is the sum of their threat level on stages they can be taken to.

EDIT: Europe is slept on pretty hard, I have more respect for them now that Orion's been there a year.
 

Chuee

Smash Hero
Joined
Jul 20, 2008
Messages
6,002
Location
Kentucky
I don't know anything about Trevonte. Lets be real. How big of a skill gap is there between someone who can 2 stock low percent Tyrant and someone I've never heard of. TKD is basically an M2K level player who uses a character with weaknesses. Trevonte is really good, so are Zeton and other top foxes but there's still no comparison...
He beat TKD's MK, Tyrant, and Tearbear at Winterfest.
Aside from that he hasn't been to anything big, but he has big wins on him.
edit:
steam- thats Apex 2012
 

Hippieslayer

Smash Ace
Joined
Aug 12, 2008
Messages
959
Location
Azeroth
Can I get some closure on which order peach/sonic/dk/wolf/fox/kirby place on the tierlist? So far Seagull mans reasoning seemed the best to me, but it'd be nice having a post from someone trustable like DMG and no one else.

Kinda feels like it is:

Wolf/fox/DK/Peach/Sonic/Kirby atm, but I am a scrub anyway so I have no idea. But even a scrub can tell that sonic is an overrated piece of crap character that is hardly watchable and the only character in smash more gay in himself than MK, random trips, chaingrabs, infinites, BPC and Elton John put together. Therefore he is clearly worse than at least Peach.
 

DMG

Smash Legend
Joined
Feb 12, 2006
Messages
18,958
Location
Waco
Slippi.gg
DMG#931
Oh god









He trusts ME...


General placements or comparisons I would think are right:

DK over Peach
Fox over Sonic
Fox over Wolf
Kirby not at the bottom

Fox
DK
Wolf
Sonic
Kirby
Peach

Maybe?
 

Conviction

Human Nature
Joined
Jul 22, 2008
Messages
13,390
Location
Kennesaw, Georgia
3DS FC
1907-8951-4471
Can I get some closure on which order peach/sonic/dk/wolf/fox/kirby place on the tierlist? So far Seagull mans reasoning seemed the best to me, but it'd be nice having a post from someone trustable like DMG and no one else.

Kinda feels like it is:

Wolf/fox/DK/Peach/Sonic/Kirby atm, but I am a scrub anyway so I have no idea. But even a scrub can tell that sonic is an overrated piece of crap character that is hardly watchable and the only character in smash more gay in himself than MK, random trips, chaingrabs, infinites, BPC and Elton John put together. Therefore he is clearly worse than at least Peach.
See this healthy bit of self doubt and scepticism just makes me trust you more than random histrionic with truth in a box and a mission to deliver it to the ignorant masses.
Not sure if serious
 

-Jumpman-

Smash Champion
Joined
Nov 3, 2007
Messages
2,854
Location
Netherlands
NAir can be punished depending on Marth's vertical spacing.
Lol, it's ALWAYS falling nair.

And people try to punish it because it's usually spaced in a retreating manner, so it gives people the impression then can punish. Also, Leon always tippers.
 

Eddie G

Smash Hero
Joined
Nov 24, 2006
Messages
9,123
Location
Cleveland, OH
NNID
neohmarth216
Oh god









He trusts ME...


General placements or comparisons I would think are right:

DK over Peach
Fox over Sonic
Fox over Wolf
Kirby not at the bottom

Fox
DK
Wolf
Sonic
Kirby
Peach

Maybe?
No, Sonic and especially Kirby do not belong above Peach. The other 3 are reasonable since their results have clearly distinguished them from her at the moment, but do Kirbys even exist anymore outside of my fellow God Kai? Sonic only had one major spike of outstanding results at Dallas. Where is the subsequent trend of results that would warrant such a long term placement?
 

Reizilla

The Old Lapras and the Sea
Joined
Mar 20, 2008
Messages
13,676
Where is Peach's first spike of results? lawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawlawl
 

Steam

Smash Hero
Joined
Aug 30, 2009
Messages
6,322
Location
Hell, Colorado
No, Sonic and especially Kirby do not belong above Peach. The other 3 are reasonable since their results have clearly distinguished them from her at the moment, but do Kirbys even exist anymore outside of my fellow God Kai? Sonic only had one major spike of outstanding results at Dallas. Where is the subsequent trend of results that would warrant such a long term placement?
sonic taking top 8 twice at a huge national can't be overlooked. it's a spike yes but it by itself is still far better than anything peach could DREAM of accomplishing. at peach's best tourney in like ever (whobo3) espy placed barely behind illmatic. and espy is still ranked over ill in texas. X also does well in WC tourneys when he attends. what more do you want lol?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom