Llumys
Smash Champion
I laughed hard.So is his full charged neutral b
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I laughed hard.So is his full charged neutral b
I wish my character's neutral B did that...So is his full charged neutral b
The bolded part does not fit the context of this specific set. TKD had won earlier in the day as chuee mentioned with MK. In addition afterwards they did do Fox dittos in friendlies, and TKD was winning. Outside that it just seems silly to assume TKD specifically wouldnt be one of the toughest people in the nation to use fox against, supported by the fact that he took a set off trevonte while Bardull, Terry, and Tyrant could not (he beat tyrant on rainbow cruise). For some moralistic reason he didnt want to use Fox against Trevonte or Larry even though hed had success previously against both (his wario ended up getting 3 stocked by larry).What San said.
Agreed completely. If some superior players don't know the ditto of their own character, and lose to worse players, then of course playing a character doesn't mean you know how to fight against them, especially with a different character...
Also, playstyles definitely have a lot to do with it. A lot of people only get remotely close to beating M2K because he doesn't camp, which is why random top MKs **** people harder than M2K does etc etc.
I'm not talking down on Trevonte I think it's just pretty obvious that he's no where near TKD...
roooflSo is his full charged neutral b
He beat Trevonte in Fox Dittos first setThe bolded part does not fit the context of this specific set. TKD had won earlier in the day as chuee mentioned with MK. In addition afterwards they did do Fox dittos in friendlies, and TKD was winning. Outside that it just seems silly to assume TKD specifically wouldnt be one of the toughest people in the nation to use fox against, supported by the fact that he took a set off trevonte while Bardull, Terry, and Tyrant could not (he beat tyrant on rainbow cruise). For some moralistic reason he didnt want to use Fox against Trevonte or Larry even though hed had success previously against both (his wario ended up getting 3 stocked by larry).
Not to say your scenario would never be true, but it doesnt fit this one. Id suggest becoming more informed about trevonte before making judgements on his skill. Given west coasts lack of presence here we have several players that tend to fly under the radar.
rooofl
It's all the upBNeutral air on shield to tipper fsmash baited much this past week bro?
LOLIdunno, Luigi should be better than D3 too. D3 and Luigi both get in some good damage when they get in, but both are stupidly slow getting there. At least Luigi's got the killpower to boot.
ThisMaybe I'm dumb but am I the only person that thinks that how boring a character is to play might have a baring on why they don't have many results? Like I could be wrong but I think Kirby is one of the least fun characters to play (probably my bottom 5) and there are much better characters to play with a similar style (not to mention more fun).
It's like jigglypuff, why would you play jigglypuff when you can play Wario who plays pretty similarly but also has a ton of fun gimmicks (that are actually viable) and just be a way better character. Wario can time people out too but he might not actually have to everytime.......
ThisUsing a character =/= playing against the character.
Lain lost to Ally's CGless ICs.
All you really know are tactics you personally don't like.
Those were friendlies after the set. I was there to watch itHe beat Trevonte in Fox Dittos first set
Riot uses Zelda successfully.
Not sure if you guys are serious...My reasoning is... Riot is awesome. Yeah, that sounds about right.
Random nonsense in red text
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P8lxdPRlBasOK, let me rephrase in a way you morons won't argue semantics:
There is no character with advantage on shield in such a way that they can reliably use it to approach.
No we saw it on livestream he beat him in Fox Dittos in tournament in Winners knocking him into losers, then in losers he went MK and lostThose were friendlies after the set. I was there to watch it
OK, let me rephrase in a way you morons won't argue semantics:
There is no character with advantage on shield in such a way that they can reliably use it to approach.
You lose Thio LOL
Yeah this.No we saw it on livestream he beat him in Fox Dittos in tournament in Winners knocking him into losers, then in losers he went MK and lost
Horizontal distance doesn't affect frame advantage. It only affects what characters can do with the frame (dis)advantage. Granted, Wolf's great range on many moves allow him to use it really well, but it doesn't give him extra frame advantage.I think Wolf's fully retreat Fair and Bair on shield have good advantage on shield.
emm...noI think Wolf's fully retreat Fair and Bair on shield have good advantage on shield.
Wait, no.Yeah so many people forget that position makes a lot of difference between what's safe on block and what isn't.
No no no that's not what I meant. What you are describing is the only way to get an affirmative answer on whether stuff is punishable. I'm referring to the idea I had for trying to get a measurement of distance that we can figure stuff on based solely on distance of moves and frame data of moves AND the distance which moves cover as well as the speed at which a character moves.Not really. You could collect data on it. Have someone retreat the move of choice on shield, and have something assist you in frame perfect shield drop/punishing actions.
what????? lolWe already measure distance in terms of Squirtles, if I'm not mistaken.