SolarChimecho
Smash Apprentice
Nintendo only cares for money obv
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
It has to do with everything. For Halo 3 and Tekken, there a regular, decent quality stream for FREE. HD was optional and cost $10. The stream only costs money if you pay for HD, the steam is otherwise free of charge.What does this have to do with anything? We're talking about it not being available for purchase at all because Nintendo hasn't given MLG permission.
Fluck that spit.Also, will MLG record matches? If so, can we view them online for free or do we have to pay for them like we did in the melee days?
I don't particularly have a vested interest in watching streamed Tekken, though. I'd like to watch streamed Brawl, which they don't have.It has to do with everything. For Halo 3 and Tekken, there a regular, decent quality stream for FREE. HD was optional and cost $10. The stream only costs money if you pay for HD, the steam is otherwise free of charge.
If the stream is free (and it currently is, since HD is an option, not something you have to buy) then I don't see where the issue is.
I completely agree with you.I don't particularly have a vested interest in watching streamed Tekken, though. I'd like to watch streamed Brawl, which they don't have.
Oh. OH! haha I finally see what you're saying! It's an interesting point, and honestly if anyone bought the HD MLG'd make like $20.I completely agree with you.
But the issue is that some people are saying it's because Nintendo doesn't want MLG to make money off of people watching the live stream. MLG wouldn't make money off the Brawl stream if no one buys the HD pass to watch Brawl in HD.
But thats not the issue.But the issue is that some people are saying it's because Nintendo doesn't want MLG to make money off of people watching the live stream. MLG wouldn't make money off the Brawl stream if no one buys the HD pass to watch Brawl in HD.
MLG could still make money off of a stream. The idea of the stream is to build hype which brings other people into the game (and therefore MLG events). Not too mention MLG can advertise their merchandise while streaming.I completely agree with you.
But the issue is that some people are saying it's because Nintendo doesn't want MLG to make money off of people watching the live stream. MLG wouldn't make money off the Brawl stream if no one buys the HD pass to watch Brawl in HD.
Different companies, different policys.Everyone invest in SD cards and save as many matches as possible!
Anyone who has a camera, please try to record matches! AllieD recorded the final match between M2K and Ally, and so far I haven't seen Nintendo sue him or anything dumb.
Honestly though, if Nintendo has taken this long to respond to streaming brawl, do you think they'd even notice if MLG went ahead and streamed it anyways? I was half-joking above, but don't you think that if Nintendo were to get mad about an MLG video being uploaded to youtube that something woulda happened by now? I really wonder if anyone from MLG has even SPOKEN to a Nintendo rep. I can't shake the feeling that something more can be done about this.
And why is Halo being streamed with no issues? Is Microsoft just better at responding to people?
Nintendo:Hello,
I have a quick question that I was hoping you could answer. MLG has been requesting permission from Nintendo for some time now to stream their Super Smash Bros. Brawl competitions over the internet. Nintendo has still not replied and MLG is unable to release any videos of their matches or show any of the matches on live stream until they do receive Nintendo's permission. For some reason they still haven't gotten a reply.
Is there any reason Nintendo hasn't replied yet? Do you know when they will have an answer?
Hello,
"Nintendo" is a registered trademark of Nintendo of America Inc. Nintendo owns extensive intellectual property rights in all of its products, including video game systems, game titles, characters, game software, graphics, artwork, and screen shots. Nintendo also retains rights in content on Nintendo's websites, including articles, artwork, screen shots and other files. Our general policy is to decline requests for permission for the use of Nintendo properties.
Sincerely,
Dervin Camden
Nintendo of America Inc.
...But...Nintendo only cares for money obv
Yeah, I'm gonna go look at that now.Do you know what this thread proves?
... ... ...that everyone should read AltF4's thread on Copyright law in the debate hall. Get *****, American people; nothing you buy belongs to you.
And I feel the same way. And they make these policies to make money... It's sickening.haven't read that thread but it's old news, we all know our copyright laws are a joke and getting worse constantly. have to agree that nintendo has been very very disappointing as of late and their indifference to the MLG livestream is just the latest in a very long line of failures. prolly still getting the next metroid/zelda games but pretty much no chance in hell that I ever buy one of their systems again
This thread is about LIVE STREAM/RECORDING. please keep it that way....But...
The only way nintendo could possibly "make" money off of denying MLG the rights to stream brawl is if they assume that there's actual competition between them and MLG; that is, that shutting down MLG is a good thing for nintendo (which it obviously isn't).
Nintendo's stupid policies are losing money for nintendo! Not allowing hacked games with things like gecko OS (and stating that doing so violates the system's EULA)? There's no winners-just jaded hackers who love Brawl+/Brawl-/just ****ing playing as Sephiroth in brawl who decide, "Hmm, I'm not going to keep supporting nintendo but rather go with a company like Valve who supports this kind of thing themselves in offline games." Not allowing a tournament to stream matches online? Again, there is NO WINNER-just angry brawlers who wanted to see the top level matches and are now upset at nintendo, and a loss of hype for one of the more valuable modern nintendo franchises-a direct loss for nintendo on both counts.
There's nothing off topic about that post. Unless your intentions were only for updates on livestream. If that's the case, I'd recommend considering this be the official livestream thread. We don't need multiple threads on the subject.This thread is about LIVE STREAM/RECORDING. please keep it that way.
umad son?This thread is about LIVE STREAM/RECORDING. please keep it that way.
I feel like I'm disagreeing with you in particular all over the place and thats not what I mean to do.You know...... I hate Nintendo. A lot.
It's like they don't understand what gamers really want. Any Brawl player would enjoy watching top Brawlers duking it out at the highest levels of play. I can't wait for their corporation to die and some better group of developers who really undertsand what gamers want, to adopt the Nintendo characters.
I disagree. Nintendo, or more accurately, Sakurai, didn't want Brawl to be competitive. It's possible that they don't want to be associated with a competitive environment because that will give them an image that many people don't want to be involved with. Non-smashers that play WiiSports may not gravitate toward a game that takes so much skill. It might be intimidating.So... you would actively hurt a company that sponsors video games-your video games to be exact? A company shelling out 60k in prizes for the best players? Why would you ever want to hurt these people? They don't make their own games, they aren't competing with you because you don't run tournaments... Nintendo should be grateful that smash has a competitive circuit-hearing that you can win $12,000 by playing a game really well sounds like a nice incentive to me to buy the game...
For an analogy: it's like Ford, BMW, and Mercedes coming together and trying to shut down NASCAR. Seems pretty accurate to me.
No, actually thats a terrible analogy. NASCAR makes ford money and provides free advertisment in a way that ford feels is beneficial. The fastest car with a Ford tag on it is a nascar, without question.The fact that you even mentioned BMW and mercedes in regards to nascar makes me wonder if you're even serious. Germany does their own thing, its called DTM (yes I googled that).So... you would actively hurt a company that sponsors video games-your video games to be exact? A company shelling out 60k in prizes for the best players? Why would you ever want to hurt these people? They don't make their own games, they aren't competing with you because you don't run tournaments... Nintendo should be grateful that smash has a competitive circuit-hearing that you can win $12,000 by playing a game really well sounds like a nice incentive to me to buy the game...
For an analogy: it's like Ford, BMW, and Mercedes coming together and trying to shut down NASCAR. Seems pretty accurate to me.
Wrong. He knows basic company policy. And when a company doesn't have a vested interest in something, they go by basic company policy. Bengals basically got the complete answer and the thread being locked right after his post would have made sense lol.You shouldn't have emailed them regarding it, Not saying that nintendo will say yes, but that's just some random customer service/Q&A employee he doesn't know anything.
Well, then you're both wrong.I have to agree with Smiley on this one.
K, sorry.No, actually thats a terrible analogy. NASCAR makes ford money and provides free advertisment in a way that ford feels is beneficial. The fastest car with a Ford tag on it is a nascar, without question.The fact that you even mentioned BMW and mercedes in regards to nascar makes me wonder if you're even serious. Germany does their own thing, its called DTM (yes I googled that).
But nintendo doesn't lose money on this. Not in the slightest!Bottom line, companies do what they think will make them money. Nintendo doesn't think it has money to make in mlg, so they don't support it. End of story.
Egg their houses.So... now that we know Nintendo isn't going to give MLG LiveStream permission, how are we going to get their attention and let them know that treating their hardcore userbase like this isn't going to fly anymore?
I was just in Seattle, too. I drove my girlfriend to the new NoA building so she could take pictures in front of it (and see the Mario Kart themed parking garage, ), so I would have been more than happy to organize a picket in front of NoA with WA smashers and such. Something needs to be done here. This isn't just "well, we disagree with MLG and so here's our reason for not giving them permission," this is outright ignoring us.Egg their houses.
Nintendo doesn't give a rat's ***, but if you want to organize a picket of hate, please do. I would join that **** in a hearbeat.