BunBun
Smash Master
Victra: Kirby is mad cute
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
The commentators said mango was laughing and joking when he was playing fox.
Also, i know nothing about their MMs from RoM2. How much money were they for? Amount of games? For all we know mango didnt give a **** because they didn't matter very much and he is cocky and doesn't care if he loses $30 to hbox because he knows he will 1) win a few sets if there are multiples and 2) win many other MMs that day and 3) win the tournament
tl;dr tournament set >>>>> random MMs
Care to tell me what these things are?
Marth didn't "develop" into a top tier character because of Ken. Marth has been a top tier character since the first tier list and at his lowest was a high tier character when top tier was Fox/Falco only.
You mean the stuff king was doing in 06?
Hbox and Mango are only more precise. Yeah, what they do is incredible and very over powering, but its not really stuff that is exclusive to puff. Puff can make a wall of bairs that is nearly impossible to get around, but every character in high and top tier have equivalent methods of getting to the same goal (gain stage control, keep it, take a stock).
Debatable in the sense that a lot of people think puff is higher, regardless of factual evidence.
King and Darc have done as expected of their character based on the tier placing. They have done about as well as falcon mains and peach mains and IC mains, overall.
To copy pasta your argument for any of those characters, all i'd need to do is convince mango to win a tournament with that character and then BAM i have a "solid argument" for why they should be top tier.
actually that is her weakness, because marth covers the air approach with an impassable sword. The idea is actually to approach on the ground with your shield. Puff can't beat marth's sword with her aerial priority and range because marth has more aerial priority and more range.
Again, the match-up is about ground mobility and stage control, not air priorty and safety.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CSjPMnuZi4
Watch that and tell me what happen every time mango tries to commit at m2k from the air and notice what happens every time he starts shield camping and approaching from the ground.
also, i would much rather get fair/bair'd by puff than shined by either spacie, grabbed by falcon or shiek, or dash attacked by peach. Puff's "combos" are mostly 1 hits that link together by stage control and opponent's mistakes.
I can't remember everything, but if you consider M2K a credible source...Also, i know nothing about their MMs from RoM2. How much money were they for? Amount of games? For all we know mango didnt give a **** because they didn't matter very much and he is cocky and doesn't care if he loses $30 to hbox because he knows he will 1) win a few sets if there are multiples and 2) win many other MMs that day and 3) win the tournament
tl;dr tournament set >>>>> random MMs
You really think Mango would lose a $30 MM to Hbox purposely because he's "cocky and doesn't care"?? Fail.yeah i guess it's just a huge coincidence that when mango doesn't win huge huge tournaments, hungrybox does, with Darc always doing very well. Just coincidences (or the fact that hbox beat all of mango's characters in money matches at Rom1 and Rom2 both, except puff dittos at genesis tourney). Coincidence.
I would go with,Top
1. Fox 9.6/10
2. Falco 9.4/10
3. Jiggs 9.4/10
High
4. Shiek 9.2/10
5. Marth 9.0/ 10
6 Peach 8.9/10
High-Mid
7. capt. falcon
8. Ganon
9. Doc. Mario
10. Samus
11. Iceys
.
my bad. i thought it would be easier to find (if you click the little arrow in the opening of the quote, it brings you to the post)Sveet, next time can you not quote your post? It makes it much harder for me to reply to it now lol XD.
That is true, but to an extent. you can still perform throw->fsmash combos with both fthrow and dthrow. If they are holding forward and you dthrow, fsmash. likewise, if they are holding back and you fthrow, you have a fsmash.I'm not a puff main, so I'm not going to be able to give you an extremely detailed list, although I'll try lol.
1. In general, over time, people's DI has improved. This means that now, Jigglypuff is nearly uncombo-able. If that isn't an asset, I don't know what is.
jab resets rarely happen, and i dont think i've ever seen one on a marth2. A few techniques for KOing certain characters have been learned and perfected. Jab-cancel-->rest has been discovered. Upthrow rest when DIed incorrectly is an easy KO on spacies, and puffs are getting better at mixing up their timing with this so it's harder to DI the upthrow. Puffs in general have improved their edgeguarding game greatly, puff can now confidently gimp the majority of the cast. Fsmash is being used more, it's quite useful, Hbox uses Upsmash effectively. Puff user's comboing has improved. Puff users have improved their efficiency with uptilt rest, and comboing into rest with other moves, like Uair, Bair, and also Crouch-cancel DIing into rests.
recovery technique? yea she always comes back XD3. The recovery technique has been perfected to a point where puffs can recover from literally anywhere on the field.
While spacing and DI do increase as players get better, mindgames.... well mindgames don't really exist at a high level, or at least are often misunderstood.4. (I know I'm kind of going out on a limb with this next argument, but try to understand what I'm saying lol, I'm not sure if it's that good of an idea, but I think it might just be possible)
As time has gone on, melee players' DI, spacing, and mindgaming creativity has improved. Due to puff's design, her floaty, ariel maneuverability, she accentuates, heightens, magnifies a player's mindgames, spacing, and DI. She is dependent upon spacing, mindgames, and DI. The better your spacing, mindgames, and DI, the better the puff. Thus, as players improve, puff will also improve, exponentially so. Of course you can say this about all characters, they will seem to be better when their player gets better. But, because puff's fundamental playstyle is all DI, spacing, and mindgames, she will get exponentially better as the player improves, to a larger degree then with any other character. It is only logical to assume then that puff will only improve with time, and get better as melee players in general do.
No because tier lists aren't based on tournament results, but instead on actual metagame advances.True, and my smash history isn't that great lol, but didn't Ken at least help establish marth as a top tier after he had dropped down to high tier? Why couldn't Mango and others do the same for jigglypuff?
i'll give you the recovery part, but the others i highly disagree. Puff doesn't combo very well, especially compared to the other high and top tier characters.Of course every good character can do similar things that jigglypuff can do, but no character can do it like her, or as well as her. Of course everyone can do some of the things that the best characters in the game can do, but the best characters are the best because they can just do it better, that's why they're top tier lol. Every character can combo, KO, and recover, but jigglypuff does it far better, which is why she deserves a spot near the top.
tournament results are just anecdotal evidence."Without factual evidence"
No factual evidence? Are you joking? What better factual evidence is there then a dominant performance by jigglypuff users in every recent major (inter)national tournament?
no, thats your logic not mine. i have always claimed that tournament results are independant of tier rankings. i thought the phrase (in quotes) "solid argument" was a tip off that i was copying your logic to show you that it is wrong.Just because every puff main doesn't win everything doesn't mean she's not a top tier character. According to your logic, because of all the falco, fox, marth, and sheik mains that place poorly, and don't win tournaments, the top tiers should be moved down. As you said, player skill comes into play. Just because someone is using a good character, doesn't mean they're guaranteed to win it all.
Ok maybe mango needs puff? Do you need puff? Do i need puff?And I think it's already been shown that Mango needs puff to win major national tournaments, at Genesis he needed puff, and at Pound 4 Mango went puff after Hbox p!ssed all over his fox.
Yea, there are gaps. But now you have to have a puff in position to hit the gaps. Do you know how hard it is for the fastest characters in the game to get through his sword? Against fox I can swing my sword in place without leaving an obvious gap as long as i don't fall into a pattern.You're speaking in old terms, yes marth's sword can keep her back, but does the hitbox stay out forever? No. Can marth keep on swinging that thing every second of the match? No. There will be holes, there will be weaknesses, things that a good puff will be able to exploit, and punish.
Also, I never said it was good for puff, I'm saying that it isn't as good for marth as many would like to think it is.
if you want i can go through the whole thing with you and point out all the mistakes m2k made. basically every time he got hit, there was something else he should have done and either made a spacing mistake or a technical mistake.I've seen that vid, and I've got to say, you picked a horrible video to use for your case lol, Mango two stocks M2K. Yes of course it's not all about ariel maneuverability, there is some ground game involved, but really, this vid does not help your point that marth has advantage against puff lol.
do you realize how general that is? aside from the word "rest", you can change "puff" to any other character and have it still make sense.You must not play very good puffs then lol, and if a puff only chains hits on you, if they play it right, then they don't even need to combo, they can just hit and run, racking up damage until their ariels knock you offstage for a KO or gimp, or they can just rest/smash you lol.
ORLY?Something else to note is the evolution of gameplay and knowledge. A random scrub with natural talent can no longer walk into a tournament in do well. This isn't 2004. Everyone who plays has to know something and have prior knowledge and practice and experience to do even remotely well in tournament. Every pro that can compete has good DI and they are very conscious of all factors of gameplay. This was not the case when Ken or even M2K were champion.
When did it suddenly become uncommon for someone to use their main character when they really want to win?Player skill vs character advantage is a pretty deep argument. The main example usually used is how mango is so much better than everyone that it doesnt matter who he uses. However even though that logic is flawed (he will always go jiggs when he needs to win aka grand finals of genesis and pound4).
So you notice how well he is at edge trapping and edge guarding, and thus the character is broken? Do you also watch kage and think ganondorf is top tier, cause that guy just spams ganon's priority around until you go off the stage (aka 1 hit lol) and then methodically edge guards you. Its a general strategy you do with every character (for the most part).lets use hbox as an example instead. When you watch mango play, you can see clearly how he adapts and just completely figures out his opponent. when u watch hbox however, Its perfect execution of bair wall of pain and rest combos and gimps. While im sure he reads his opponents to some extent, its not as apparent because the characters over powering qualities are just soo apparent.
Yea, she is. 6/7 out of 26 = PRETTY **** HIGHI honestly believe Jiggs is higher than most characters.
who said our tier list was made like that? brawl tier list is made off of tournament results, not melee.I think we should re-evaluate why the other chars are top and remember that our (USA) tier list was based on character usage and tournament placings, not the hypothetical way the japanese made theres ( based on how chars should do in hypothetical situations.) while i think both ways have their merits, I think its hard to ignore the placings of hbox, mango, and to a lesser extent darc, over the last year.
No its always been the same reason, they are really good. Not to mention its been the same 5 characters at the top since the first tier list, just in different orders (sheik fox falco peach marth was the first tier list)Some things to think about:
- Over time different chars were considered top for different reasons.
yepShiek was considered top because of her dominance over almost all of the cast.
huh?However with how much other chars have advanced. shes become nothing special.
nah those matchups are still really good for hermatchups that used to be Hugely in her favor are either non-existant (the mid-low tiers) or alot closer to even (peach/marth).
players playing the character is not related in any way to how good the character is. if everyone dropped fox, he would still be #1.why is she still considered sooo good? how many top shieks still exist? amsah in europe and m2k in states? wow yep amazing character.
jman got 5th at pound 4, zhu got 4th at genesis, ect ect- I still think Fox is the best. However when was the last time a fox won anything more than a local tourney? Foxes dont even place in top 5 @ majors!
But if a character is continually winning tournaments...it's top tier material.Since when is high tier too limiting to win tournaments? its not like anyone is saying puff is low tier and mango is that amazing... i'm saying puff is a high tier character and mango is amazing.
but If A Character Is Continually Winning Tournaments...it's Top Tier Material.
yeah...*sigh*proposal: tier lists don't really matter and in the end you should spend less time arguing about them on the internet and more time playing the game
taken out of context. gg.Denpaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!
I see where you're coming from, but i still sort of disagree.But if a character is continually winning tournaments...it's top tier material.
The way I see it, or at least what makes sense to me is, when a player is winning as many tournaments as hbox and mango are, the character plays a big role. Yes, obviously Jiggs isn't low tier, but players would not be able to win tournaments that consistently unless the character they were using had a lot of options. This is mostly the reason why certain characters are better than others. The have better options.
On that note, I think Jiggs has enough options to be top tier. Just looking at the year's worth of tournaments and NOT thinking Jiggs is top tier is seriously really ignorant. They way things are going, everyone's just gonna cover their eyes and ears regardless of how many times jiggs proves that she's top tier material.
It makes no sense to me.
taken Out Of Context. Gg.
end of threadproposal: tier lists don't really matter and in the end you should spend less time arguing about them on the internet and more time playing the game
yeah, that must be it, jigglypuff's are the only players that have "deep mental games"..lol the game is far deeper than "camp until you can kill her and then kill her," the reason jigglypuff players can stand a chance is because of the deep mental game that goes on in jigglypuff vs. character matches.
That was many years ago, when the Melee metagame was still developing, and there were only a handful of top pros.isai won tournaments for years and falcon is clearly not top tier
good job at completely missing my point. the theoretical strategy vs. jiggs doesn't work because there's very little room for error. mistakes are inevitable when humans are playing. the mental game in the matchup far outweighs the theoretical "jiggs can't win because fox runs around and fires lasers" idea because we don't play super theory bros. in tournament.yeah, that must be it, jigglypuff's are the only players that have "deep mental games"..