It is ad hominem.Yeah it's not a straw man or ad hominem lol. But, it is using facts with out context. Context is extremely important when talking about who beat who especially when you're using it as evidence for your argument.
For example, I beat ESAM last weekend.
That sounds pretty good doesn't it?
In actuality it was in a wifi tournament amd ESAM used DK, Pikachu, and Samus and I didn't beat his pikachu. The context shows that my win against him actually means nothing.
An ad hominem (Latin: "to the man"), also known as argumentum ad hominem, is an attempt to link the validity of a premise to a characteristic or belief of the person advocating the premise.[1] The ad hominem is a classic logical fallacy
He never said he was good at the matchup as far as I know, he said the matchup simply was in our favor. Not all matchups beliefs are based around personal experience. Furthermore, its not because its in our favor that he should autowin. I believe its probably around 6-4 when played right, doesn't mean I could never lose the matchup.
Toobusytocare, I am pretty sure if you ask gnes he will tell you its at best even and at worst around 6-4 for ics. My question is, how many of you actually secondary/main diddy? Most people don't seem to realize just how much playing as diddy allows you to become adept at using the bananas.
ADHD says he ***** ice climbers when he plays well, could be johns, but I will let him have the benefit of the doubt. However, did he ever take into account the fact he might simply be better than them? Or that they weren't aware of all their options vs diddy. I have seen ninjalink vs ADHD, he most Diddy related tricks with ics, but none of the more complicated ics desynch that revolve around Diddy's tricks. TBH I am really saddened ADHD wasn't at Apex, I wish I could have played him to see how he does vs ics : (