2/3 things in this post are opinions with no factual backing.Snipers have drawbacks, you're just dumb.
<3 ODIN.
CoD sucks.
*hint: the line that says ODIN is a statement of fact.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
2/3 things in this post are opinions with no factual backing.Snipers have drawbacks, you're just dumb.
<3 ODIN.
CoD sucks.
This. Especially since most of them suck and can never put up consistently good scores. Most of them care more about style points than actually getting kills.
Your argument just lost its credibility right there.Simply put, there is no drawback to sniping. You give up nothing, and gain immeasurable power over all other players.
Sorry for even bothering to reply, this is why the community doesn't like you.
Snipers aren't enough to ruin this game, not by a long shot (punny). Believe me, I've killed my fair share of snipers with a shotgun at close range. It's perfectly viable. But in a game where a certain amount of realism must be achieved to create balance, a sniper should almost ALWAYS lose a close range battle. Even giving them the benefit of the doubt and implementing a way for a sniper rifle to kill up close is a horrible solution to their combat deficit.
Let's say for a moment that we decided to fill all the gaps in the combat deficit of EVERY weapon in the game.
Shotguns could kill cross-map.
You could commando lunge someone from five blocks away.
Pistols would have automatic headshot kills.
Rocket launchers and grenade launchers would explode everything in a mile-wide radius.
LMG's would outrank any gun in terms of power.
Throwing knives and grenades would have homing features.
If all this was true, the game would be unplayable. Fortunately it's not, so we continue to play.
But the simple fact that sniper rifles even have the ability (not saying it works all the time) to be a one-shot kill at all ranges is unacceptable. Simply put, there is no drawback to sniping. You give up nothing, and gain immeasurable power over all other players.
Again, TL;DR
Snipers don't have drawbacks. Everything else does.
End of chapter 2.
We're both spouting bull****, you just use more words and accomplish less. If what you said was true about snipers being overpowered, then it wouldn't bother me. I'd give my reasons, but I can't sway a mule's opinion.Snipers have drawbacks, you're just dumb.
<3 ODIN.
CoD sucks.
Not trollin' bro, thank you for backing this post with facts.Your argument just lost its credibility right there.
Something obviously didn't register with my above post. If snipers were as OP as you guys made them out to be we would see a plethora of snipers putting up amazing scores, but uhhh newsflash... we don't. The reason for this is because the sniper is obviously outclassed by both ARs and SMGs in this game.
Most of you guys just need to get over the fact that the shotgun sucks now. Maybe if so many people didn't whine about them in MW2 they wouldn't have gotten nerfed so heavily. This is just another reason why the CoD community is terrible. They never know what they want.
good. i like freedom of speech and i love have a competition of ideas.@Lumpy
Agreed. Snipers as OP is debatable. Which is precisely why I debate it.
Always up for a good debate/discussion/whatever. Unfortunately I don't have any concrete data to back up my claims I'm just talking based on my own personal experience with this game thus far.Not trollin' bro, thank you for backing this post with facts.
It's true that not all snipers put up amazing scores. But this can be attributed to small children with small brains who think that doing 360 no scopes will win them friends in real life. Anybody who actually "snipes" tends to do quite well in this game, as I've seen.
The line between "trickshotting" and "sniping" is becoming blurred. Check to see if the kids on your team are Y-Y-ing before every shot they take. This might affect their score.
i predict that when this game has been out for like 5 more months, snipers with be like 3 times as common.Everyone has to be able to agree with me on this though... If snipers were indeed "flawless" as some of you claimed they were, wouldn't that mean snipers would be abused much more often than they are currently?
This is why I enjoy playing with Alex more: We focus on trying to win rather than going for absurd killstreaks. You captured one or two points I think, and stood next to one for a good 10 seconds.
You jelly, Connor? The video was still amazing.This is why I enjoy playing with Alex more: We focus on trying to win rather than going for absurd killstreaks. You captured one or two points I think, and stood next to one for a good 10 seconds.
Inb4everyonecallsmeakill*****.This is why I enjoy playing with Alex more: We focus on trying to win rather than going for absurd killstreaks. You captured one or two points I think, and stood next to one for a good 10 seconds.
i honestly have the most fun playing with him and encountering funny gamertags like 'Fuzzy Grandma' or 'Chilifart98'You jelly, Connor? The video was still amazing.
Ehh I have the most fun when I play well... To each his own I guess.i honestly have the most fun playing with him and encountering funny gamertags like 'Fuzzy Grandma' or 'Chilifart98'
people are waaaaay too serious.
This definitely.I don't give two ***** about realism.
I just want balance
Excellent post.Snipers are not overpowered. I'm not going to comment on whether or not quickscoping belongs in an FPS or not but it's crazy to think they're better than say an SMG close range(not even going to bring up the crappy shotguns). Quickscoping is a skill. One that takes practice to get good at. I worked my *** off to get good at sniping in MW2 and then had to forget everything I knew(exaggeration) once Black Ops came out and start again. I've been sniping for two years and I can't pull consistently good scores sniping. I go horribly negative quite often. I lose almost all close range battles because quickscoping up close is ****ing difficult. I have to scope in at a guy rather close to me, hope him shooting at me doesn't cause my scope to go off him and shoot hoping it one shots(I do concede that most sniper shots are one shots). That's why a lot of the time I try to either avoid close range confrontations or pull out a magnum. This crap that they're this all around amazing weapon is really just false. And sure, aim assist helps quickscopers, but to say it's not skillfull is just dishonest. If they were as many of you say, they'd be consistently at the top of the leaderboards. I'd much rather run into a sniper than a guy with an AR or SMG.
And just a sidenote. referring to every sniper as XxNoscopesxX or anything like that does nothing to further your argument. The name and age of a sniper means nothing. Just like calling them wannabe Grizz's means nothing. Grizz is a great player and pulls off some amazing games with snipers. And the "quickscoping" community and "trickshotting" community are not a blurred line generally like someone before said. A lot of the competitive sniping community despises trick shotting. I'm not sure why it annoys so many of you guys considering they're easy kills(unless you're playing against a full team in SnD)
So as a tl;dr:
-Snipers are NOT overpowered
-They are NOT the best close range weapon
-Quickscoping is NOT something anyone can pick up and do
-Trickshotting is not the same thing as quickscoping
-I completely understand your argument if you're arguing that it's unrealistic, but I disagree if you think it upsets balance/it's overpowered.
You absolutely CANNOT use the fact that there isn't an abundance of quickscopers as a reason for why the sniper rifles are not overpowered in MW3. You can't. Why? Because Quickscoping isn't the easiest thing to do. It does take a bit of skill to pull off. Yeah, sniper haters, I said it. Quickscoping does, in general, take more skill than using an AR or something at closer ranges.Your argument just lost its credibility right there.
Something obviously didn't register with my above post. If snipers were as OP as you guys made them out to be we would see a plethora of snipers putting up amazing scores, but uhhh newsflash... we don't. The reason for this is because the sniper is obviously outclassed by both ARs and SMGs in this game.
Most of you guys just need to get over the fact that the shotgun sucks now. Maybe if so many people didn't whine about them in MW2 they wouldn't have gotten nerfed so heavily. This is just another reason why the CoD community is terrible. They never know what they want.
They're somewhat difficult to use efficiently. This does not mean they aren't OP, though.Everyone has to be able to agree with me on this though... If snipers were indeed "flawless" as some of you claimed they were, wouldn't that mean snipers would be abused much more often than they are currently? Can we all agree that the sniper is far from the most popular weapon class in MW3 because despite their buffs, they still require a fairly high degree of skill, and aren't quite as overpowered as most of you claim them to be? If no, then my next question is why aren't they being used more?
-Yes they are.-Snipers are NOT overpowered
-They are NOT the best close range weapon
-Quickscoping is NOT something anyone can pick up and do
-Trickshotting is not the same thing as quickscoping
-I completely understand your argument if you're arguing that it's unrealistic, but I disagree if you think it upsets balance/it's overpowered.
That's a pretty ridiculous oversimplification. The AR user can miss a bullet but keep firing. If a non semi auto sniper misses, they must wait to do the bolt action and by that time they're dead.@TRG
Think about the confrontation the other way around. A person with an AR needs 3-5 bullets to get that kill; a sniper needs one.
lmaooooohotarms' brother's clan/crew are the most stereotypical little kids screaming and singing into the mic and then call each other trash while spectating..
If the sniper missed, doesn't that mean...That's a pretty ridiculous oversimplification. The AR user can miss a bullet but keep firing. If a non semi auto sniper misses, they must wait to do the bolt action and by that time they're dead.
Yeah of course, but when you said it takes a sniper one bullet and an AR 3-5 you make it sound as if the sniper has the obvious advantage which I why I brought up the point that a sniper has to be much more accurate to win the gunfight and it's not as simple as whoever kills in less bullets wins.If the sniper missed, doesn't that mean...
...the person with the AR deserved to win the gunfight...?
My point exactly.@TRG
Think about the confrontation the other way around. A person with an AR needs 3-5 bullets to get that kill; a sniper needs one.
You'd think that. :-/If the sniper missed, doesn't that mean...
...the person with the AR deserved to win the gunfight...?
Yeah, aim is key for sniping. Getting used to the whole aim assist thing is hard, and that's where most of the skill in sniping lies. But dude, if I already pumped two or three shots in a person with my AR, the simple fact that they can insta-kill me in the middle of my bullet stream makes no sense to me.Yeah of course, but when you said it takes a sniper one bullet and an AR 3-5 you make it sound as if the sniper has the obvious advantage which I why I brought up the point that a sniper has to be much more accurate to win the gunfight and it's not as simple as whoever kills in less bullets wins.
yeah, i see why lol. i can tolerate it if they're actually trying to play, but i died in the middle of the map only to find the entire team sitting on the well in seatown.lmaooooo
i mute them most the time in game
i'll probably be on around 7 or 7:30ish tonight.Lumpy, invite incoming.
But isn't AR vs AR almost always a case of "whoever has better aim wins" as well?Yeah of course, but when you said it takes a sniper one bullet and an AR 3-5 you make it sound as if the sniper has the obvious advantage which I why I brought up the point that a sniper has to be much more accurate to win the gunfight and it's not as simple as whoever kills in less bullets wins.
Interesting analogy but I really don't think it applies very well to quickscoping. Quickscopers certainly aren't changing the rules. the players aren't just magically changing CoD. Quickscoping is intended to be a part of the game. The pawn is not intended to move two spaces. And even so, this analogy doesn't account at all for the work one needs to put in with a sniper. It's not so simple as changing the rules to your benefit. If you don't put in the time, you suck.@Grand: Well, yeah, but the problem with a competent quickscoper is they're bending the rules. It's like they're playing The Matrix with a Sniper Rifle. Okay, bad example. But my point is if they know what they're doing, it's no longer balanced.
Let's look at it like chess.
The pawn is a piece that can only kill on a diagonal. In one space. But what if a player changed the rules so that HIS pawn could kill in two spaces? Or even forwards or backwards? And still be a pawn?
You could say it could make it to the end of the board and it can become a rook, or a queen, but that's not what's happening. The rules changed because this player said so.
See my point?