Well now, you've kind of formatted this in a way that makes it hard to respond to, but here goes...
You: "Weren't you the one who stated that I was bad (more or less in a different context) because you had the preconceived notion that I played TDM and FFA in mw2?"
Me: I don't recall that, and even so, it's still super easy to win and go positive regardless of what game you're playing. I said I predominantly play FFA or TDM because the game is new, and I need to understand the game before I really get into objective games.
You: "Slayer is a role? I understand that killing is part of the game, but to play every game mode for it? what? you're basically throwing away the point of every game."
Me: In objective games, you need to have someone/multiple people who get large amounts of kills. Take CTF for example, if you have an entire team of 6 running for flags, you are going to get ****ED UP. If need be, I'll jump on a flag or get the bomb plant, but more often than not, that's not necessary. Anybody who plays with me will agree with me when I say that I always have the objective in mind, regardless of game type.
You: "Kills do nothing in objective based games except slow the other team down or help them get closer to the objective with the new spawn system. Its great that you think that you're amazing at this game but everyone thinks the same thing.
Everyone."
Me: Well now, that's... stupid. I definitely consider myself to be above average at this game, but I don't consider myself amazing. I'm realistic, not arrogant. And you're saying that me killing someone who's about to capture a flag isn't just as important, if not MORE important as capturing a flag itself? Get real. Kills are a vital part of ANY gametype. Period.
You: "Its cool if your teammates hold you up, but killing a lot doesn't help in domination, as I said before. Sometimes it makes it worse.
Its cool if you want to play Domination and talk about how you win, but I'm pretty sure most people aren't concerned with you flaunting how amazing you are at this game.
EVERYBODY THINKS THEY ARE GOOD.
its easy to think that when you play with a team against randoms."
Me: I talk about the games I did exceptionally in, I don't really care what you have to say about it. Very rarely I go negative, and most people who play in parties usually ragequit against us, and with the new matchmaking that for some reason insists on putting people in parties against us, it seems to happen much more often that we end up in games where we win by forfeit. When we actually play a competitive game to completion, it's usually not anything to brag about.
You: "I'm sure you could multitask and commit more than just making your K/D flashy. You saying that you commit to the team in one mode in one way other than killing says a lot. Of course killing is an integral part, but as I stated before I'm sure everyone appreciates efficiency in winning in other ways other than just blasting randoms and ignoring the objectives until it"
Me: Not even once did I say I ignore objectives. As a matter of fact I said quite the opposite:
...because it is a very rare occasion that the other team will be able to take a flag that we don't permit them to take. In the event that they do, I'm one of the first people to support in re-capturing the flag. Even if I'm not on the flag itself, I'm there clearing the enemies around it.
Pay better attention. I only go for kills when I know that the win is secure.
I gotta say, you got mad for a vague statement that I made so I figured I wouldn't let your efforts be in vein.
Here are the facts:
1. There is no accurate representation of skill because there are too many variables
Actually, thanks to the new fancy leaderboard, there's not. If you have a low K/D, but you have a ****load of Flag captures, bomb plants, etc, I'd still want that person on my team.
2. Most people would rather hear about the actual physics of the game than listen to you choke on your KD's long decimal.
I'm sorry that I'm not the lead designer of this game, but I spend a lot of time trying to help people in this game/give an educated opinion on things. I've provided really helpful links I've found as well (ex. my previous post). All you do is ***** and gripe to me about my K/D, just shut up please.
3. When there are so many randoms, it is easy to get a good KD, and there is no solid, written out standard of getting a good KD. I could flank, run right into the direct path of fire, or I could sit back and shoot you from a high corner. Nobody has the right to label any of such as the true skill method, so justifying being good at this game as a representation of your KD is just silly.
www.hupitgaming.com stop playing with randoms, it's the worst way to play this game. And again, I don't judge someone solely on their K/D. I quote:
And let me say this right now: If you have a high K/D and a low W/L, you're bad at this game.
4. While I do love killing, and I must admit that I am selfish, for you to say that you are selfless for just killing everyone and letting your teammates hold you up is disappointing.
I'm not even going to respond to this. Aside from dealing with your atrocious spelling and grammar, I’m really hungry/bored of this.