Jim Morrison
Smash Authority
*Spinshot to FF-B-air over STH*
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
With a damage lead and camping, it is greatly in his favor. Not even, not close to even, but strongly in his favor. Averaging it out just isn't accurate, considering 6+ minutes can be spent on camping compared to the 1 minute or under getting a lead. That, and I don't think Zelda would have that strong, if any, advantage over Wario face to face.you're silly. I said it's at least 55:45 all things considered. he can't camp his absolute best until he gets a damage advantage. WITH a damage advantage and camping it's about even, but until he gets that advantage it's zelda's matchup anyway. when you average out "advantage zelda" and "even" you get out "small advantage zelda"
Lol thinking so 2 dimensional. As if Wario is only restricted to safely traveling in one direction.also. stages don't go on forever. once zelda corners wario he's not going to be able to keep running away.
expect to get Usmashed since it comes out faster than your bair and hits a hell of a lot harder.*Spinshot to FF-B-air over STH*
The difference between the two is how hard it is to approach the other.He's going to get caught sooner or later if he's camping. Likewise he's going to eventually hit her if she's camping him instead with smashes and tilts if she's at a lead.
K, I shall rant over there.Don't DARE TO
We're in SONIC NOW
Ice Climbers finished
Gawd I can't believe how much do I need to write to get on date >_> Stupid summaries ;_;
2 hours *shoots self* Oh well ^_^
Sonic discussion GO!
EDIT :: @ Mr. DMG Go discuss it to Kataefi's thread or make a new thread on the Zelda boards not in here please ;3
SAME TO THE OTHER ZELDAS!! >:l
Honestly if this was really happening to me.....I would play Zelda if I had a lead and if I got down I would switch to Sheik. I know this doesn't have much to do with the Zelda-Wario individual matchup, but at least Zelda has the luxury of pressing down b and solving these problems.The difference between the two is how hard it is to approach the other.
Zelda sucks at approaching, and Wario is very hard to hit while he is running away.
Wario is fine at approaching, and Zelda can't run away/camp like Wario can.
They aren't comparably equal because Wario is better at both things. Zelda can't play a hit and run game, and she can't approach well. Wario can do both fairly well.
If you think Wario can be caught that easily, then look at Zelda's running speed. Look at her air game. Even just looking at that and comparing it to Wario's air speed and his air game, you can tell she will have a hard time hitting him.
Cmon guys, it's not like I'm making an unreasonable claim... If she was like Marth (good running speed, good air game) then I would be stupid asserting he could camp her this well. But she isn't, she is a very defensive based character that loses most matchups where she is forced to approach quite a bit more than she defends. She has bad matchups vs Marth, MK, Snake, etc partly because when she gets down, she has to approach. She's not good at doing that lol.
Dtilt retracts quickly enough to USmash before you can bair unless the zelda accidentally buffers an extra dtilt.It doesn't if Sonics spinshot is spaced properly. It goes over you, spacing the B-air exactly right, and you're not going to U-smash me out of Spinshot while you're using D-tilt.
Ah well, I'll just go with you. Yea, Sonic can't approach, obvious 60:40.
I do think Shiek does a bit better than Zelda, it's a weird trade off.Honestly if this was really happening to me.....I would play Zelda if I had a lead and if I got down I would switch to Sheik. I know this doesn't have much to do with the Zelda-Wario individual matchup, but at least Zelda has the luxury of pressing down b and solving these problems.
The Wario-Sheik matchup is fun as hell to play. I really don't have my mind set on a specific ratio right at this moment with the matchup........but it's not too bad for Sheik.I do think Shiek does a bit better than Zelda, it's a weird trade off.
Shiek can sometimes stop the camping with Needles and she is pretty fast herself when she needs to be. Where she really suffers is trying to kill Wario, she has trouble recovering, and she can't Ftilt lock him since he can pull out his bike and she will pick it up the next time she tries to Ftilt.
I would say... maybe 60:40 for Wario on that one? I probably wouldn't try too hard camping her, I like fighting Shiek face to face. I dunno, she would do a lot better if she either killed better or lived longer.
sonic's more or less already done in another thread.Gosh Marsulas
What did I say
And to complete your little fun you're talking about............Sheik WTF?
Now please read the posts above and/or contribute some Sonic discussion >_>
I don't do because I don't know the matchup very well
granted, however, wario wasn't going anywhere. it was a "yes I can" "no you can't" "but I wantz to" argument.Honestly who cares what we discuss? I could care less about discussing about Sonic
That actually sounds pretty accurate.Sonic is fast, and you are not.
You're easy to combo, and we are not.
You can't camp us effectively.
You have no approach.
If anyone wants to wifi me to get a feel of how the match goes, let me know here.
![]()
Dair to Footstool to Bair Lock to Free Grab/Fsmash/Usmash. That is pretty potent, go use itIm sorry but your overall conclusion on Zelda Vs. Peach is disgracing me as a Peach Main. It should be 65: 50 Zelda or 60: 50 Zelda.... Peach doesn't have the upper hand.
THISAlso, having a lot of mindgames shouldn't be why a character has an advantage over another. If your opponent is stronger than you, has more range than you, kills earlier than you, can deal with your attacks easily, etc. yet you have tons of mindgames, YOU might win the fight, but it doesn't really seal the deal as for who has an advantage at close-range, long-distance, etc.