Well D***, now I has to go win my local tourneys (fat chance, SK92 plays there), start collecting da monayz, and go to more OoS tourneys... that is to say my parents will actually let me >.>
LOL, you don't have to win; just place well, give top-shelf competitors a run for their money and make some heads turn. Regardless of whether or not you win or lose, if you demonstrate the mere capacity to compete with a character who is comparatively disadvantaged to most of the rest of the cast,
people will take note of this. I learned so much from my set against Mr. 3000 at OH SNAP! v4.0 in Winner's Brackets, and I have written much on the subject of that particular match-up since then. I, too, am fully convinced that Sonic can be a legitimate contender later down the road, but we just need more guys like 3K to do what he has accomplished everywhere else other than Texas.
All we really wanted for Sonic was just one or two more spots, and to at least get the sense of security that people know why he really is there. Don't get us wrong, we love Sonic, and we just want him to be understood. For the moment, he rose, and that's good, but still a little bit lower than he should be (as far as the metagame has gone for now). Are we not being reasonable by just saying Sonic should be in the upper half of the lower section of the list? We know our character has limitations, but it just gets annoying when people speak of the same stupid things over and over... at least when it isn't correct.
I completely understand this sentiment. However, just for clarification's sake, we had
no idea where everyone else was going to fall as far as the order of the tier list went (other than, of course, MK and Snake). The gaps in the tiers were determined by how big of a drop-off there was in the averages of points. We didn't look at the order of the list and just made arbitrary cut-offs, and we
especially did not look at where Sonic was in F-Tier, say to ourselves, "THIS ISN'T RIGHT!" and moved him below Mario, Ness, Lucas and Samus just to spite you guys. The tier splits occurred where there was a natural gap in points. Sonic actually had a higher standard deviation than many of the other characters (meaning a handful of us had him higher while everyone else had him around the same area he was on v1.0), so not
everyone thought that Sonic didn't deserve to move up. This is just the way the numbers played out.
As it has been mentioned repeatedly, the weakest portions of v2.0 are the bottom half of the list. Everyone has pointed that out, and we even admit it ourselves. There just isn't very much representation of this lower-tiered selections at major tournaments, so we admittedly went by our scant knowledge of what we knew his match-ups and move set to be, rather than explore the entirety of his current meta-game. This only makes our list imperfect, but we need dedicated Sonic mains to travel more and tear a new ******* in unsuspecting pro players so that we have a little bit more to go off of.
I'll take Samus as an example. Most of us here feel that there is no justification at all as to why she's above Sonic on the tier list. I mean, tournaments, she's no contest to Sonic. Her match-ups are as bad as Sonic's, with some of the more popular characters on the scene (Falco, Dedede, MK) causing her big problems, which I think gives Sonic the edge over her in this department, considering none of his match-ups are higher then 35:65, and only a handful are that.
Like I said, all we did was vote, take the averages of each respective vote and sort the characters accordingly. The only time bias occurred was when individual members were assigning specific characters with numerical values; other than that, the order was purely dictated by the averages, and the tier divisions determined by value gaps. We didn't look at it and intentionally move Sonic underneath Samus, who is in many ways more disadvantaged than Sonic is. I promise we will take a closer examination on the lower-tiered characters here in the next several months though. For me, I will be making closer observations this weekend in San Antonio at Final Smash 5.
One problem with placing in large multiregional tourneys is that regardless, of how good or not Sonic may be, it is likely the better, more recognized players will win.
Like I said, you don't necessarily have to win or place well. It could be that you just suffer from bad luck and end up in an insanely hard pool or brackets that you don't place well. This isn't meant to be johning in advance, but I'm just trying to point out that we do take a look at things like who people played in order to get as far as they did in a tournament, and how impressive the performance was. If you play against an established professional in an epic set with your "scrubby" Sonic, that established professional will more likely than not mention something about that set to someone else. People don't tend to forget about close matches they have against lower-tiered characters, and it's something that definitely sticks out.
A great example (as someone else has pointed out) was at Sethlon (Falco)'s newly-minted Tomball Monthlies in Tomball, TX, where Espy finished 4th or 5th, behind the likes of FlipHop (Diddy), Ultimate Razer (Snake) and Sam Boner (Fox, Luigi). It only featured under 30 players, but there were enough recognized players present for this particular victory to become notable.
Add to this the lack of Sonic mains at all, and I think his current placings mean more than what theyve accounted for so far.
These are valid reasons, but they are also johns. I'm not trying to be a jerk when I point this out, but it sounds like you guys are shoehorning yourselves into an "us against the world" scenario, when that simply isn't the case. Yes, it's true that there are an unusual amount of external factors that may have more or less sabotaged your attempts to make Sonic the new pink, but actions still speak louder than words at the end of the day. I can rant about how amazing my set with Mr. 3000 is all day in the SBR-B, and I can do so with the most amazing, poetic prose these forums will ever see; but he's just one guy, and the only guy I happen to play who happens to be amazing with Sonic. Trust me when I say that there are believers of Sonic's worth as a character in the Back Room, but we just need more people to do well at bigger tournaments for us to have more ammunition.
I don't see why this would place him below characters like luigi samus ness and lucas, who have gotten even less rep. Sonics also have beaten some people of note.
I love Luigi and I also happen to think he's amazing. His ground and aerial mobility are awful, but his attack speed, power and priority easily puts him in a whole different class than all the characters you mention. Other than that, I don't profess to know much about the Samus, Ness or Lucas meta-game to decide what the order should be, so this will be redetermined by you guys in the coming months.
We know sonic probably wont place high in large tourneys etc, thats not a problem. but can you honestly say those characters have proved themselves to be more viable in a tourney situation? ATM all I see thier mains doing to support thier case is grossly overestimating their characters ability and throwing matchups no lower than 40:60 despite rarely being able to even place top 4 in anything
LOL, funny story: I hosted one of my Smash-fests last week, and we had a small, 14-man tournament. In Loser's Finals, I went random against my crew-mate, who mains ROB, MK, and excels greatly with Mario. He went Mario, confident that I would end up with a terrible character, and I happened to get Sonic. I applied Diddy Kong tactics in this match (i.e. do not use F-smash or B-air until the appropriate KO percentages), and racked up damage with dash-dance feints to reverse grabs and lots and lots and lots of F-tilts. Using these methods, I had a surprisingly easy time killing and gimping (I eventually 2-stocked my crew-mate), and it was probably the second time I'd ever played Sonic in my life. I didn't use any of his special moves other than Spring Jump because I had no idea how to apply them, but I found him surprisingly effective if I applied the same zoning tactics I use when I play Diddy.
Moral of the story: I also think he is better than Mario. =) This atrocity will be amended in coming months!
thats the same reason that that chuck nasty guy doesnt get PT more respect because even though thien flat out said that he trades sets and wins with his top level diddy consistently, its still a local tourney that doesnt account for much. and i dont think thats right.
Trust me, I understand that this sucks just as well. I was ****** everyone in the state for months, but recognition was still eluding me. The reasons for my victories not being particularly noteworthy are understandable, though; when has Oklahoma
ever been known for being a competitive state, and how good would someone like me do against
real competitive players? Unfortunately, traveling is the only answer, but if you are gifted and talented enough, the character recognition will follow shortly after.
Incidentally, Chuck Nasty tied 9th place at HOBO 11, the same tournament I tied for 13th (KOS-MOS tied for 25th). He did better than I did, and all of our combined results surprised a lot of people at how well we repped Oklahoma in our first, big, major out-of-state experience. The hard truth is that no one cares that he and I beat each other all the time.
Sonic's success in tournaments, larger and small, is down to the attitude of Smashboards. Mindless statements thrown around about Sonic by people like Overswarm just further cement Sonic's position as a joke character. As a joke character, you're not taken seriously, obviously. When it comes to Sonic's turn on a boards character match-up discussion, I cannot stress how difficult it has been to get any points across. We're completely ignored and shunted just because we main a bad character who can't do anything to dtilting characters.
I don't know when or who started the trend, but it's our fault for exacerbating the situation and perpetuating the joke. There is an undeniable humor in the the D-tilt thing, but it comes across as snobby and elitist when one or two of our own guys are throwing that out purely to be antagonistic. In their slight defense though, it has been difficult to micromanage every argument that you guys were bombarding the v2.0 thread with, and some really unfriendly and downright nasty retorts were dished out in rapid-fire succession. I won't lie, either; my first instinct after being overwhelmed by that initial squabble was to just say, "Y'know what? **** ALL OF YOU LITTLE KIDS!" and be done with it.
I'm glad I didn't do that. =)
I especially wanted to do this after people started accusing my original post of being long and meaningless. The funny thing is now that no one is pissed off, you guys are actually coming around to see my original points. I haven't even reworded anything; I'm merely just repeating things that I have been saying all along. =) It's just that people are more willing to listen to each other when polarized emotion is put on the back burner.
But yeah, sorry that this is the situation that you guys have been cornered into. I can't speak for everyone, but I will do my best to wean everyone else off being a jerk about it.
Hence, as ive said before, I think matchup discussion threads in general are a complete waste of time and most certainly should NOT be an important consideration in tier lists. the real matchups exist between the best players who play the best of each character in tournaments, they know more than anyone else. When you base tiers (partly) off completely arbitrary lists (yay examples, lets poke fun at the marios) who list almost everything as no worse than 40:60 and advantages against a surprising amount of the cast with hardly any high-level tournament matchups between top players to work with, in an effort to make thier character look great, how can that be considered accurate?
Very insightful. This is why making tier list (even for a game that's been out for years) will never be a perfect process. I've been spending the last 36 hours or so trying to make you guys understand that we have
so much time left in the lifespan of Brawl to make the appropriate updates and adjustments. Even though you feel like we've done Sonic a disservice with v2.0 with his relatively poor placement, it is not the end of the world. Summer will be around before you know it. Many match-ups will be revaluated. Blowouts like D3 vs. Wario may end up being
a lot closer than people actually think it is, etc. We've already seen things like MK vs. Diddy swing closer to Diddy's favor, ZSS become more and more viable against top-tiered characters, G&W slowly fall from grace, and Olimar blow up the rankings. A lot of swings and shifts and reconsiderations have gone down in the span of 10 months. Now that everyone is a lot better at the game (and hopefully a lot smarter), who the hell knows what's going to happen in six months time?
I'd put money on Sonic doing some hellla cool things. *shrug* That's up to you guys, though.