But we're not even worried about those people, and neither should you, if you're not a whiny scrub who loses to scrubby, spammy Metaknights. Because I guarantee you those aren't the MK mainers who are winning tournaments en masse right now.
The only people you should be concerned with are the MK players with actual skill. In which case the situation is easily remedied: you can A) pick up Metaknight yourself as a secondary, B) find a character that's at least even or does not completely suck against him, or C) continue to lose.
Yeah, you're right, but I'm not looking to test the sucky MK mainers. I'm looking to test how badly over powered MK really is, by using the MK mainers that keep winning matches fair when the odds are even and all they have to rely on is their skill.
If the MK mainers have been winning so many matches based on their skill, and not on MK's cheapness, then MK mainers have nothing to worry about, as they have the same odds in a MK only tournament as they would in normal tournaments. Although I doubt this is the case.
If (or when) they all have their ***** handed to them, we would have proven that MK is cheap enough to give the MK mainers with no skill an unfair advantage on their competition. Enough of an advantage to give them a win they didn't earn, and deem MK worthy of a ban.
Personally, I think we should ban him for now and actually LOOK for a counterpick more aggressively, rather than waiting for one to show up in a tournament. That'll take forever, since half the time they're all uncontrolled match-ups with countless variables.
That's my point. Going MK will not automatically make you a winner. Use the characters you're well adjusted to, and are actually decent with.
I'm sure we can all agree that MK doesn't give everyone such a huge advantage that he's bound to win every one of his matches. Now, how much of an advantage MK gives the player is what we have to establish. Whether the advantage is fair or not.