mountain_tiger
Smash Champion
Well, I was mainly thinking of characters like Marth that have moderately fast pummels... With characters with slower pummels... yeah it's slower than a chaingrab. Either way, the job doesn't get done very quickly...
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
How is Fox supposed to do better against MK, Marth and Falco?So one grab from an IC results in death?
as in, you kill nana, and its just sopo on the field (or even just across the stage) and he can still death you from a grab?
fox v wolf matchups. who has it better?
mk: fox
Snake: pretty much even
Wario: probably wolf
Falco: Fox
DDD: Fox
Marth: fox slightly
Diddy: even
fox has better matchups
An extremely fast moveset that provides him with a lot of options and frame traps. Wolf's "tools" are pretty much limited to bair, shine, and, laser. That's why there are like NO Wolf mains over here........because Wolf is so god**** predictable. Main reason why he dropped(below Fox I might add which is what I was pulling for ever since last summer).How is Fox supposed to do better against MK, Marth and Falco?
Wolfs tools beat Fox' tools in every way, there's no logical explanation on why Fox should do better against any of them.
How can Fox do better vs Marth? Wolf can do more against Marth's zoning game than Fox can. Wolfs reatreating fair/bair can beat Marths aerials if used correctly and his ftilt also outranges all of Marths ground moves. Fox dies ten times earlier than Wolf and that covers one of Marths biggest issues right away. There's no way that Fox is doing better.
MK is a similar case although he doesn't have **** CGs against Fox (Wolf isn't nearly affected by Marths CGs as much as Fox). However Wolf still has much better (anti-) zoning tools than Fox does and Wolfs mobility in the air gives him more opportunities to avoid MKs hits in the air. Wolf also doesn't die at 120% but survives fresh dsmashed at 180% on BF (suck it Fox).
Fox is doing better against them than Wolf? No way, man. No way.
LOL, good point there.Yea your right Wolf doesn't die at 120% against MK......he dies at 80% as soon as he's knocked offstage.
Yep, same here.Jack Frost said:mine is set to X
QFTits cause turnament rules are hypocritical concerning infinites.
True, but pummel attacks are generally quite fast, so you can fit in four or so pummels in the time it takes for DDD to do a DThrow and regrab.
I can break out of Marth's grab if he pummels me once up til about 35-40%. Even the fastest pummelers (who can infinite Wario from an air break of course) are relatively slow/don't do much damage.Well, I was mainly thinking of characters like Marth that have moderately fast pummels... With characters with slower pummels... yeah it's slower than a chaingrab. Either way, the job doesn't get done very quickly...
In Atlantic North, which unfortunately and fortunately is my region. Unfortunately because they tend to have way too much banned. Fortunately because the region is mad talented.No, they are out right banned.
Except for IC's, just because its hard. Stupid logic really but hey, thats smashers for you. <_<
You're amazing so you'd beat me anyway.Somebody lied to you.
Squirtle vs. Marth, whatever you wish, 3/5?
Individualize it for the characters.Yeah, I mean I kinda don't like the 300% rule because you're always gonna have someone who will decide to CG til 290% and then kill, but I guess you would have that issue with whatever the % was decided at.
Standing Infinite grab releases, like I mentioned earlier, have the issue of an opponent purposefully throwing out "empty" grabs just to stall for time. Dedede cannot do that, he can delay his throw for a bit on purpose but that just gives more time for the opponent to escape without being able to regrab them. That and the grab release ones take a lot more time to do the same Damage as Dedede/IC's CG's even if both of those characters delayed theirs/didn't pummel.Yes, but if it's a standing infinite against him, and other standing infinites like grab releases are banned, why not D3's infinite against DK?
Now, I'm not trying to say that all infinites should be banned (personally, I think that the standing infinites should be allowed), but you should apply the same rules to all standing infinites. Other infinites which are harder to do (e.g. any of the IC's chaingrabs) wouldn't be counted obviously. Basically, why ban standing infinites when you don't ban D3's infinite on DK? Or am I missing something really obvious here?
IDK if IC's are CGing like Snake or Dedede, unless their opponent isn't mashing and they have enough time to Charge the Usmash/Fsmash, there's a good chance Snake or Dedede or even DK could live past 150%. If they do indeed live past 150% (whether it be from a CG or not, or a large stage/ceiling like Japes/Castle Siege/whatever), what happens then? Can the IC player still go for the CG, or is he not allowed to because he's already past that mark? If he's allowed to, how much further can he go?Individualize it for the characters.
ICs honestly only need like 150 for example.
And what part about this is "standing"? I didn't say Dedede has no Infinite on Bowser, I said that he has no Standing Infinite.Dedede has an infinite on Bowser, simply short step CG Bowser to the edge of the stage and voila, infinite.
You're a smart man.Why does ground speed>a good approach?
Even though, yes, Fox is fast on the ground, I don't see how it stops him from having a mediocre approach and mediocre defensive options other than OoS retreated nair. When he runs in to approach, what is he going to do? One of his better approaches (SH Fair, DId away towards the end) is very height specific, and many characters can crouch, crawl, or just stand under it and punish. Other than that, he doesn't have much range on many of his attacks, and is usually easilly punished by a shieldgrab or OoS attack.
His camping game also isn't that great. He can't camp well and actually keep camping; he has to run and shoot lasers because they have no hitstun. It's good because they come out quickly, and his ground speed makes it easier for him to run and get in more lasers, but it's bad with the limited defensive options that he has--many characters can easily approach. His tilts are okay; dtilt is meh, ftilt can be used for range and poking attempts, and utilt chains into more utilts at low percents. His aerials are okay; D-air is easily shieldgrabbed, if you get hit with F-air, you can easily DI out of it and punish with a free aerial, N-air can be used for retreating, B-air is a strong hit with meh-ish range and very little lag on landing, U-air kills.
It also sucks that he's the fastest faller in the game, and many characters have stupid options against him. There's his unwinnable MUs: Pika, Shiek, (ICs?) where Wolf has his unwinnable MUs: D3, (Shiek kinda, ICs?). However, many characters are able to chain utilts on him til 40%, or have some low percent chaingrab on him, like Marth's or Peach's. Diddy is able to chain utilts and dtilts cleanly from low-mid percents because of his fast-fallness.
I know for a fact, being a Diddy main, that the Wolf vs. Diddy matchup is much tougher than the Wolf vs. Fox matchup, and was almost certain that given the fact that Wolf has better zoning tools, better range and approaches, and a better mid-range pressure game, that his matchup with Marth is also better. I'm not sure about his MUs with Falco and MK, but I think they'd be about the same.
Fox beats Wolf at recovery and killing. That's basically it. Other than that, Wolf has the tools to approach, decent defensive options, good range, and good mid-range pressure. Just because Wolf's metagame is moving at a snail's pace (which can really be said for quite a bit of characters) doesn't mean that he loses these core things of his gameplay.
Wolf shouldn't be below Fox.
It has nothing to do with DI, my friend.Your information is extremely outdated. This was back then when people didn't know how to DI properly. They can break out. It's not an Infinite until kill percents.
They found a way to break out? If so, then fair enough I guess.Your information is extremely outdated. This was back then when people didn't know how to DI properly. They can break out. It's not an Infinite until kill percents.
So ledge infinites aren't standing anymore?And what part about this is "standing"? I didn't say Dedede has no Infinite on Bowser, I said that he has no Standing Infinite.
Yes, but Fox has faster acceleration.Doesn't Dedede have the fastest top speed when fastfalling? Just asking.
are absolutley beautifulICs cgs -___________-
did you see the part where you can do the walking CG until you are in the right position to ledge infinite him?Look at the name of this type of infinite. "Ledge". There. Do you see the difference?
That is Walking Chaingrab leading into a Ledge Infinite. I still don't see a Standing Infinite anywhere.did you see the part where you can do the walking CG until you are in the right position to ledge infinite him?
agreed and editted for truthlolsemantics
Same end result with little risk in both. It's still an unwinnable matchup for Bowser with the nonexistent chance of tripping.
You can't trip from walking; only from dashing.lolsemantics
Same end result with little risk in both. It's still an unwinnable matchup for Bowser with the minimal chance of tripping.