Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Kirby doesn't do alright against ICs. No way to approach through desynched Blizzards and a hard time seperating them makes them one of Kirby's hardest match-up's.Bad matchups with Wario, G&W, Marth, MK, possibly Snake and Pika. He does alright vs Dedede, Olimar, IC's, ZSS, etc.
Wario: No. It's not bad. At all. >_>Bad matchups with Wario, G&W, Marth, MK, possibly Snake and Pika. He does alright vs Dedede, Olimar, IC's, ZSS, etc.
I think Marth's fine where he is in A Tier.marth should be in S tier
Well then neither can Dedede or Falco.Marth can't win tournies.
Marth gets ***** by MK too much. DDD has had consistently good tournament results, despite having a number of disadvantagous characters. However, MK is probably the most common character to see in tournaments, so it is unlikely a Marth can get far before reaching a couple of good ones.Well then neither can Dedede or Falco.
I hope i can play you one dayKirby does pretty badly against ZSS, too. 60:40 is being pretty nice, if ZSS camps hard enough Kirby cannot get inside. Pretty good (although old and maybe a little lopsided) example:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SgnC7X4v4GE
With that said, Kirby can do some pretty amazing damage once he gets inside, but he really shouldn't if ZSS plays the game right.
Neither Fiction, hunger, or I camp... and I'd say we do pretty well for ourselves.You're missing the point. If a Wario doesn't camp on a match-up where it gives him a decided advantage, he's either:
A. Not playing to win.
B. Can't camp right.
Either way, they're not using the character to it's potential, and it's the CHARACTER that counts in the match-up. not the player. Otherwise everyone could claim that Marth has a bad match-up against them, unless he "plays gay" by not spamming f-smash, and actually using other moves.
Base match-ups on the character, not the player, if a character can camp to make the match-up advantageous for them, the match-up is in their favor. If they don't take advantage of that, it's their loss.
The point wasn't about who had a better recovery, it was about that spacies in general get gimped hard not just wolf. And I know fox can cancel his side b also but go ahead and cancel fox's and then cancel wolf's you will see a huge difference.Don't even compare G&W's tools to Wolf's.......that's laughable. Bair is actuallly a decent spacing tool for Fox......he's not really a character that is built off zoning......he's more of an in your face character so I don't see why you brought that up.
Fox doesn't ever even have to use FireFox. Fox can cancel his side b as well<_<. Shinestalling allows Fox to have multiple options which Wolf doesn't possess. Foxs' recovery is better than Wolfs.
Fox can deal with Marths zoning.....that's why the matchup is only a 4-6.
Once again Foxs' recovery is far better than Wolfs'.
I agree with the matchups for the most part.
Falco also gets ***** by MK pretty badly.Marth gets ***** by MK too much. DDD has had consistently good tournament results, despite having a number of disadvantagous characters. However, MK is probably the most common character to see in tournaments, so it is unlikely a Marth can get far before reaching a couple of good ones.
Marth can't win tournies.
Rise and Dancing Blade.Lol lern2MikeHAZE.
According to the MK boards, it's 55-45 in their favour. Hardly a **** matchup....Falco also gets ***** by MK pretty badly.
And don't forget that Marth has had pretty consistant tournament results too.
That proly needs to change then... the majority of marth players seem to believe it's atleast 40-60 for them. A lot feel it's worse.According to the MK boards, it's 55-45 in their favour. Hardly a **** matchup....
I was talking about Falco. I probably should have specified that.... As for Marth, I have no idea what the matchup is like, so I can't comment on it.That proly needs to change then... the majority of marth players seem to believe it's atleast 40-60 for them. A lot feel it's worse.
I mean think about it, MK and Marth are built around the same idea: a fast swordsman. MK just has better tools than Marth, and a lot more options. So in this matchup the Marth player has to significantly outthink the MK to beat out his better options.
Brawl isn't fun without Ganon.i dont.
Dear Ganon boards:
STOP PLAYING GANON!
Love,
Kojin
Really? Falco vs MK for top players has always seemed to me really close to even. Like just as even as Wario vs MK.MK vs Falco is flat out ******** if MK is allowed to plank. Like honestly it's not even close to fair. Without it I'd actually put MK vs Falco at a lesser 6/4 than Marth, like Falco would seem like a dead solid 6/4 while Marth is borderline 65/35.
Ya it is pretty even without planking, but with...Really? Falco vs MK for top players has always seemed to me really close to even. Like just as even as Wario vs MK.
That is without planking of course. Falco just gets ***** by it.
He gets ***** too hard by everyone in s tier to be in s tier.marth should be in S tier
he loses to three of them and beats the rest of themHe gets ***** too hard by everyone in s tier to be in s tier.
yea, but the two guys on the top of the list...he loses to three of them and beats the rest of them
This one .Okay. Thanks BengalsRZ.
Which of the the two tier lists I see is more accurate? Because they're really different.
But Marth does better against Falco's camping than MK.Its not even at all even if the MK doesnt plank.
Its the same issue as is it is with Marth.
once the Marth/MK gets up close, Falco really has few options.
All he can do is camp.
true. it really suck balls that they made him so bad.Brawl isn't fun without Ganon.
We can use a lot more Ganons and a lot fewer projectile campers.