Roxas215
Smash Lord
How is mario fludd OP??
And yea ivy is beast. He's probably my 3rd-4th best(don't know if my shiek or ivy is better)
And yea ivy is beast. He's probably my 3rd-4th best(don't know if my shiek or ivy is better)
-
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
The Brawlplusery - Brawl+ Codeset - Updated 3rd April
- Thread starter Almas
- Start date
- Status
It's not. >_>
Its useless against people who can recover low and know how to sweetspot.
If you're calling fludd OP'd, learn to sweetspot better. >_<
trojanpooh
Smash Lord
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2007
- Messages
- 1,183
All I know is that with whatever changes were made in 4.1 (not sure if they are in 4.0) it was very very easy to send a recovering opponent incredibly far with it.
Edit: Crap your right. I forgot the most important rule of Smash. CPU = Moron
Edit: Crap your right. I forgot the most important rule of Smash. CPU = Moron
![[TSON]](/data/avatars/l/114/114196.jpg?1360761019){kind=avatar}
[TSON]
Hella.
Ness needs some special attention >_>
Cause while everyone else is getting buffed he's sitting idle and now its gotten to the point where he's pretty behind :I
But the only changes I agree on so far are nair tripping on the sourspot and uair comboing better at low percentages.
Cause while everyone else is getting buffed he's sitting idle and now its gotten to the point where he's pretty behind :I
But the only changes I agree on so far are nair tripping on the sourspot and uair comboing better at low percentages.
GG.
Characters who dont recieve changes != Not getting attention.
Snake has barely gotten any changes but he's perfectly fine.
When a character is BAD and has gotten barely any changes, there goes your platform to support well-thought buffs.
I'm just sayin, though.
Roxas215
Smash Lord
Were there any changes given to peach? Cause she is fine and i cant think of any specific changes that were given to her.
[TSON]
Hella.
Most of the general changes were nerfing Ness is what I meant. He needs some individual buffs to fix that O:<
Sukai
Smash Champion
Ness is a Frigg'n machine in Brawl+.
I honestly don't see why people are complaining about him. Just looks like groundless speculation to me.
I honestly don't see why people are complaining about him. Just looks like groundless speculation to me.
Skip2MaLoo
Smash Lord
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2008
- Messages
- 1,293
No, Zelda and Sheik is different. Pokemon trainer is pokemon trainer, not pokemon single parent.
Revven
FrankerZ
The thing is, Sage played Ness in an actual tournament environment (Brawl+ tourney actually, ChuDat's tourney to be more exact) so right now he has more Ness experience in actual serious matches than what most of us probably have.
Skip2MaLoo
Smash Lord
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2008
- Messages
- 1,293
to the guy complaining about ness, maybe its just you. try using more characters. i was never good with jigglypuff and i started to second her in b+
Sorto
Smash Journeyman
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2008
- Messages
- 409
As far as I know, the default buffering frames in brawl+ is like 2-3 frames. This gives it a more melee feel then brawl, since brawls buffering is like 10-11 frames. I know the buffering can be changed by altering the codes. But, I feel that perhaps the buffering system default frames should be closer to brawls numbers. SO that perhaps brawl+ tournaments may also follow suit.
It is my understanding that brawl+ is not melee 2.0, but is instead a combination of melee and brawl with some extra changes that aim to make all characters in brawl more playable. I felt the new buffering system was one of the new things that brawl introduced that was actually well recieved. Buffering allowed for minimalistic combos (even though hitsun counter acted much of it) and quicker chaining of moves. If anything, I feel it is competitively a good thing for a fighting game and made regular brawl move a lil faster then it would have other wise. As well, keeping this larger buffering window in brawl+ would help to keep alot of that "brawl feel" that everyone has become accustomed to in the last few months, while still allowing a faster paced game that includes comboing, l canceling, competitiveness and a lot of good melee attributes.
It is my understanding that brawl+ is not melee 2.0, but is instead a combination of melee and brawl with some extra changes that aim to make all characters in brawl more playable. I felt the new buffering system was one of the new things that brawl introduced that was actually well recieved. Buffering allowed for minimalistic combos (even though hitsun counter acted much of it) and quicker chaining of moves. If anything, I feel it is competitively a good thing for a fighting game and made regular brawl move a lil faster then it would have other wise. As well, keeping this larger buffering window in brawl+ would help to keep alot of that "brawl feel" that everyone has become accustomed to in the last few months, while still allowing a faster paced game that includes comboing, l canceling, competitiveness and a lot of good melee attributes.
Blank Mauser
Smash Champion
The newest brawl+ codeset lets individuals choose the amount of frames of buffer they want. So if you want a larger buffer window but someone else wants a smaller one, you just set the handicap.
No need to alter codes or anything like that. =D
No need to alter codes or anything like that. =D
Blank Mauser
Smash Champion
In the newest codeset you can just change your amount of handicap. Handicap should be on by default.
Basically 100% handicap is 10 frames of buffer, Brawls amount. 90% is 9 frames, 80% is 8 frames, and so on and so on. Brawl+ will set the amount of buffer for each person, and ignore the handicap when the match starts.
Basically 100% handicap is 10 frames of buffer, Brawls amount. 90% is 9 frames, 80% is 8 frames, and so on and so on. Brawl+ will set the amount of buffer for each person, and ignore the handicap when the match starts.
jokey665
Smash Ace
...Why would they not?
If tourneys let people make names to change their controls, why wouldnt B+ tourneys let you change your handicap?
BEES
Smash Lord
I can't seem to notice a difference between 0% and 100% handicap. It all feels like 0 buffer. Maybe I'll try adding the code again.
Also, someone needs to add taunt canceling. It may only be cosmetic, but it's one of those cosmetic things that would add a lot.
SHOW ME SHOW ME SHOW ME SHOW ME YOUR MOVES
Also, someone needs to add taunt canceling. It may only be cosmetic, but it's one of those cosmetic things that would add a lot.
SHOW ME SHOW ME SHOW ME SHOW ME YOUR MOVES
Metatitan
Smash Master
buffering will probly have a set number so that the game is consistent and exactly the same for everybody and totally non personal
umm... actually no. We want it to be personal and completely up to each user.
>___>
By that logic, tourneys wouldnt let you create your own tags and controls. And would forbid you from using your OWN tag with your OWN controls on your OWN console at your OWN setup. <____>
XSilvenX
Smash Lord
*sigh* This thread has so much stupidity in it. Buffer customization being illegal in tournaments? Wow
Anyway...
Can someone PLEASE give me the text for the 4.1 gct file so that I can update it with the new file replacement code. I'm tired of this random freezing bullsh*t. Brought my Wii to school today and had some peeps play the game and it froze twice on me...f*cking TWICE. Most embarrassing thing ever...
Or if someone can give me a .gct with file replacement 2.0 and Brawl+ 4.1. already set that would be pretty cool.
Anyway...
Can someone PLEASE give me the text for the 4.1 gct file so that I can update it with the new file replacement code. I'm tired of this random freezing bullsh*t. Brought my Wii to school today and had some peeps play the game and it froze twice on me...f*cking TWICE. Most embarrassing thing ever...
Or if someone can give me a .gct with file replacement 2.0 and Brawl+ 4.1. already set that would be pretty cool.
The latest 4.1 beta has the File Replacement 2.1a code in it.
I´ll PM it to you if you wish.
XSilvenX
Smash Lord
Thanks a lot.
zephyrnereus
Smash Journeyman
official Nintendo-made Tournaments are like this...seriously
shanus
Smash Hero
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2005
- Messages
- 6,055
A new nightly builds site is now up (please download from the mediafire site and not the webserver):
http://web.me.com/shane_mulligan/Brawl+_Nightly_Builds/Welcome.html
http://web.me.com/shane_mulligan/Brawl+_Nightly_Builds/Welcome.html
Sukai
Smash Champion
Am I the only one who think Fox has been nerfed badly in shanus' latest nightly build?
goodoldganon
Smash Champion
How so? His u-tilt wont combo into itself more then twice, the n-air should have more knockback, and drill has a little more landing lag, making it combo into u-smash later. Nerfed? Ya probably, but not anything major. But do tell us what you think.
IC3R
Smash Lord
Oh noez, we're doing a Smash64 v2.0 D:
[/sarcasm]
[/sarcasm]
FrozenHobo
Smash Hero
i'd kinda like to see that.....
IC3R
Smash Lord
Hey shanus, what's this supposed to mean:
Did the Gentleman just get Meleefied? D:Brawl+ BETA 4.1 Changelist said:
- Status