Ryusuta
Smash Master
Battlefield is a good choice for Ivysaur in this match-up, and that's a very common starter.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Anyways, to sum up your numbers Ravin:
Advantage:
Bowser (90-10)
Ivysaur (90-10)
Ganondorf (85-15)
Donkey Kong (65-35)
Lucas (65-35)
Olimar (65-35)?
Charizard (60-40)
Mario (60-40)
ZSS (60-40)
Neutral:
Captain Falcon (55-45)
SOnic (55-45)
Sheik (55-45)
Snake (55-45)
Wario (50-50)
Samus (50-50)
Yoshi (50-50)
Jigglypuff (45-55)
Pit (45-55)
G&W (45-55)
Disadvantage:
Fox (40-60)
Marth (40-60)
Link (40-60)
Ike (35-65)
R.O.B. (35-65)
Falco (35-65)
Peach (35-65)
Ness (35-65)
Luigi (35-65)
Ice Climbers (35-65)
Lucario (35-65)
Kirby (30-70)
Zelda (30-70)
Squirtle (25-75)
King Dedede (25-75)
Toon Link (20-80)
Metaknight (10-90)
Pikachu (10-90)
though, like I said before there are still quite a few things I would argue though @.@
But overall i think its more accurate....
Link can outcamp her pretty well. Its sad, but true. Link is a lot better, just his recovery is a </3She's at a disadvantage against Link?
And Ness is a bad match-up for her?
Lucas doesn't seem to be on the list.
She's at a disadvantage against Ike?
Olimar is at the disadvantage against her?
Let's lay off of the ad hominem crap here and stick to the issues. You've made some completely... well, stupid claims about Samus' match-ups and haven't given anything reasonable to back them up. A 90-10 match-up is considered so broken by tournament standards that the disadvantaged person can be put into a situation in which they actually CAN'T fight back, and very easily. To put this in perspective, Mario vs. DeDeDe is a match in which DeDeDe can infinite Mario right out of the gate and one grab means one stock on Mario's part. It's still only considered a 70-30 DeDeDe.No, its not, have you ever actually played a very good Samus? PT is a bad character in general, ive seen you QQ int he Tier lists as well and try to argue your point, which is really, why are you here when you almost know nothing about Samus?
I agree ^^ like I said before... But it makes more sense thinking of it that way, right?Just the same, I think a 90% win ratio in the metagame is expecting WAY too much.
I have yet to see anyone argue the Pikachu Samus matchup.Let's lay off of the ad hominem crap here and stick to the issues. You've made some completely... well, stupid claims about Samus' match-ups and haven't given anything reasonable to back them up. A 90-10 match-up is considered so broken by tournament standards that the disadvantaged person can be put into a situation in which they actually CAN'T fight back, and very easily. To put this in perspective, Mario vs. DeDeDe is a match in which DeDeDe can infinite Mario right out of the gate and one grab means one stock on Mario's part. It's still only considered a 70-30 DeDeDe.
To say that Samus has some sort of ability that is even more vicious than this and somehow offsets the fact that she's a very floaty, laggy, weak character is completely ridiculous. Either come up with some hard evidence (PROTIP: ANECDOTAL EVIDENCE DOESN'T COUNT), or don't get all uppity when I call you out on it.
First of all, whether I play Samus or not is irrelevant.For the record, I am not about to start a debate with someone who hardly plays Samus to begin to tell you her ups and downs.
It was a basis for comparison. A very direct one, too. I'm a little concerned that you weren't able to make the connection.And this has nothign to do with mario vs d3? your the one saying focus on the issue.
I disagree with the Link match-up. When I compare his camping game to a good Pit's or a good Falco's, or even R.O.B.'s it's not really difficult to get around. And I definitely disagree that she has a harder time with Link than Pit. Pit's arrow spam is much worse than Link's due to the frequency of the shots, and Pit has better answers to her projectiles than Link does. Pit's side B can attack and reflect projectiles at the same time, and his mirror shield blocks everything, including normal attacks. And Pit is harder to kill due to his recovery options.Link can outcamp her pretty well. Its sad, but true. Link is a lot better, just his recovery is a </3
Ness is a horrible matchup, her slow downtime in the air is a horrible thing, anyone who knows how to use a bat well, dodge, or when to absorb, will beat you. also being aggressive against a Samus is a thing to do, ness is good at this. infact too good when fighting a Samus. Or maybe Ness is too good? Oh shi..
Lucas is there.
You really need to be close for a kill move on Ike, IE she has no real ranged killing move other then charged shot, on Ike, in the middle of BF its around 160% to KO him, a ike who can simply hit your four times due to her floatiness, which a Ike can simply wait for you to airdodge and Roflcopter you can kill you at 85%. Other things come into play also.
Olimar is yes. Grabs are his only real threat as her disjointed hitboxes beat him in the air, Zair ***** ground, Simply pressing Neutral A to smack pikmin off, then edgeing like gimping a ivy.
In a term to say, this is all argueable. Ive just seen Sir O QQ a lot in plenty of threads lately, and I do not believe he has any real liable tounry experence.
its also samus best level... so it wouldn't do well as a counterpick ^^Battlefield is a good choice for Ivysaur in this match-up, and that's a very common starter.
I disagree. Whats wrong with Ravin?Yoshi vs. Samus is 60:40 Yoshi at best (for Samus), and already was agreed upon on Xyro's old Matchup Thread before it died. She has really nothing on Yoshi except Zair, and her Projectiles are mostly beaten out by Yoshi's Aerials.
PS: Never list to Ravin.... EVER
This isn't true. Orly said 50:50, Hylian said 50:50, Smash Gigas said 60:40 Samus favor, Xyro said 60:40 Samus favor, I Feel Asleep said 70:30 Samus favor(possibly 80:20), and Serris said 60:40 Yoshi (possibly 45:55). The general consensus was that Samus has the advantage or the match-up is even.Yoshi vs. Samus is 60:40 Yoshi at best (for Samus), and already was agreed upon on Xyro's old Matchup Thread before it died. She has really nothing on Yoshi except Zair, and her Projectiles are mostly beaten out by Yoshi's Aerials.
PS: Never list to Ravin.... EVER
First of all, Orly Said 70:30 Yoshi. Where did you get 50:50 from? http://www.smashboards.com/showpost.php?p=5270432&postcount=35This isn't true. Orly said 50:50, Hylian said 50:50, Smash Gigas said 60:40 Samus favor, Xyro said 60:40 Samus favor, I Feel Asleep said 70:30 Samus favor(possibly 80:20), and Serris said 60:40 Yoshi (possibly 45:55). The general consensus was that Samus has the advantage or the match-up is even.
http://www.smashboards.com/showthread.php?t=191376&page=7
^Link to last page of thread^
Personally I say 50:50. I've never had any issues with Yoshi, but I've never felt I had any overwhelming advantages either.
Three words: second jump armor.I think its even personally(sorry mmac). 55-45 yoshi id say. Samus cant spam too well, but zair is an excellent move against someone who cant shield it and keep going.
First of all, that was 70:30 in Samus favor... He said on the next page after he considered what you said he thought the matchup to be neutral, as is seen on this page.First of all, Orly Said 70:30 Yoshi. Where did you get 50:50 from? http://www.smashboards.com/showpost.php?p=5270432&postcount=35
Hylian gave no explanation for his Ratio
Smash Gigas gave one of the worst thesis I have ever seen for Yoshi, And try to push that not only Footstooling interception was a good tactic, It was a MANDATORY Tactic (Sound familiar? Ravin did the exact same thing).
Xyro's Thesis was lack luster at best, and made out like all you had to do was knock him off and go onto the ledge to win. Do you really think that Yoshi's Recovery is THAT horrible?
I feel asleep completely admitted that the only Yoshi he had play in his entire life was complete garbage, don't you think that should make his opinion Void?
Serris is the only one I knew he played a good Yoshi, because he played against me. Ask him how badly I destroyed his Samus
Marth is like 5 tiers higher than Samus for a reason. I'd say 65:35 in Marth's favor. As for Yoshi, even. I just played a lotta brawl yesterday and I felt like posting that general idea.
What? If you can get Falco down to one stock and throw in some damage before being KO'd, that hardly merits for being "EXTREMELY difficult." The tactic that is commonly used by Falco players is chain-grabbing, and Falco's chain-grab has nothing on Samus. If Falco's chain-grab was like that of King DeDeDe's, then that would be a different story.id make falco at least 15 85. facing a good falco is EXTREMELY difficult, just as hard or harder than olimar in my opinion.
falco is the perfect counter of samus, his lasers ruin her approach and spacing, he can cg samus but by hiting her with a Dair, then your set up for another grab, this can give samus up to 80% dmg and the only ay out of ths is to outsmart him. if you can gt a falco off the edge and you have some ability to play off edge it makes it a lot easier but with his spacing avdvantage over samus good luck in trying to get him off the edge, unless he goes after you like a noob. Not to mention he has a reflector shield to samus's big blue thing and missiles making it a lil harder to set up combo's and a lot harder to nail him with a charge shot. Falco has god fast dodging abilities and has the advantage over samus in close range matchup.What? If you can get Falco down to one stock and throw in some damage before being KO'd, that hardly merits for being "EXTREMELY difficult." The tactic that is commonly used by Falco players is chain-grabbing, and Falco's chain-grab has nothing on Samus. If Falco's chain-grab was like that of King DeDeDe's, then that would be a different story.
airdodge to zair, ever hear of it?Get short-hop double-lasered. Destroys Samus's ability to approach.