I acknowledge the disadvantage but don't believe it's as significant as it's made out to be at all.jason's argument is similar to the one I presented to you a few days ago. Even assuming fox plays correctly and looks for those holes and plays around that weak point, the fact remains that he's still playing around a fundamental disadvantage. Just because fox has the tools to play around a disadvantage doesn't leverage an even match, it only means he doesn't lose outright, but we should still acknowledge that disadvantage accordingly.
at the very least, DD grab works on fox with a lot of characters simply because he has doesn't have the range to deal with it (see: marth can grab literally every single attack fox has). Fox can waveland as a means to beat DD grab on landing lag, but he has no such solution to DD/CC grab on his approaches and is forced to the generic "camp them back" answer, which isn't practical over the long run. I think the closest example I can think of here is Jman, and we can observe his performance readily.
edit: I have also thought falco to be better for tournament purposes than fox for some time now. we (me you jason) had this argument before where we questioned if every fox for the past 5 years was "rusty" if you'll recall.
Jman barely plays much anymore.....
M2K tried that on PC at Oc3 and at some later tourney with Marth and PC got around it because you can't always be CC'ing vs Fox so Fox can get him. Fox's attacks were beating Marth's grabs/retreat attempts so clearly Fox's speed is not ot be underestimated here.
I did NOT call Foxes in the last five years rusty. I said that the current best Fox we had to base our perception of Fox on, was in fact, rusty.