Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Sigh. Why would I claim Hungrybox is unbeatable? I swear people deliberately miss the point of people's posts here to provide them some kind of counterargument.Cause they're all infallible right?
Col Bol, Mango, Dr. PP, Zhu, Merc have all taken either matches, sets, or tournaments from Hbox. And those are just off the top of my head.
It's easy to name drop people you know are good that haven't beat Hbox, it's harder to realize they make mistakes and are not perfect.
As far as I can tell the point you were trying to make that no one should say **** about how to beat hungrybox unless they're m2k armada or amsah. Isn't that it?Sigh. Why would I claim Hungrybox is unbeatable? I swear people deliberately miss the point of people's posts here to provide them some kind of counterargument.
I didn't mean to make it as a sense of relying on it. But it's like a tricky strat. Look at Vanz. He plays everyone so that he can trick people up with the match-ups.the problem with that strategy being that top players are the best at adapting (hence why they're top players) and relying on gimmicky tricks w/ bad characters isn't really going to work. axe lost to armada twice because armada adapted quickly.
Agree'd. That second set comeback was if anything the greatest comback ever.I think Axe lost because Armada is a better player. Axe did better in the second set so if anyone was adapting then it was Axe.
um, axe is an amazing player. like... imo better than armada.I think Axe lost because Armada is a better player. Axe did better in the second set so if anyone was adapting then it was Axe.
Im wondering what grounds you have for this statement.um, axe is an amazing player. like... imo better than armada.
pikachu's just a bad character.
Lmao, Axe is very far from being a better player than Armada. Axe would have lost just as bad if not worse using his Falco or Fox. I can't believe there are people who think otherwise.um, axe is an amazing player. like... imo better than armada.
pikachu's just a bad character.
Pilachu vs Peach isn't as bad as Pikachu vs Fox or Falco but Axe has no problem beating them. And Pikachu vs Peach is def winnable for Pikachu. Check our Cort vs Chu Dat.i don't think the pika-peach match-up is even enough to be able to determine the better player simply based on axe vs. armada.
armada lacks pikachu experience, however, while axe gets a lot of peach experience here in the US. i'll admit i def. jumped the gun on my last post.
Lmao, Axe is very far from being a better player than Armada. Axe would have lost just as bad if not worse using his Falco or Fox. I can't believe there are people who think otherwise.
Pilachu vs Peach isn't as bad as Pikachu vs Fox or Falco but Axe has no problem beating them. And Pikachu vs Peach is def winnable for Pikachu. Check our Cort vs Chu Dat.
QFT.You really need to learn how to word your posts >.>, I'm actually astonished at how you can make every thing you post controversial.
I wouldn't say Axe is 'very far from being a better player than Armada.'
I don't even know how you could come to that conclusion.
This right here!Cormada vs ChuDaxe let's make it happen
the thing is, bro, it takes more skill to get 5th with pikachu than it does to get 1st with any top tier character.If you're going to use the fact that he uses a bad character as an argument for him losing the match while he is equal to his opponent then any argument is useless. You could say someone like Lord HDL is the best player in the world it simply doesn't appear that way because his character sucks.
If we're going to debate who is better than who then the only sensible way to measure someone's level is by what they are able to achieve in tournament regardless of the character they use. Therefore someone's level is measured by their skills coupled with what those skills are able to achieve with whatever character they use. So I stand by statement that Axe is far from being better than Armada, perhaps not far from being his equal, but he's not better by a long shot.
People do realize that some people are simply better with one character than another? That's why each person "mains" a character. People who use low tier characters either use them because they're bored or want to challenge themselves (mango), they love playing the character, or because they are naturally the best with that character. Otherwise, wouldn't everyone just use fox?
All that to say that, if Axe is using pikachu, it might just be his best character. There's no need to talk about people being more skilled because they place high with a lower tier character, because the fact of the matter is, the highest they are capable of placing might be with that character. I mean, look at jiggs. People don't take complaints of her being broken seriously, because instead of complaining, those people should just go out and prove how broken she is. Why don't they do that? Some people don't feel like being "gay", but the vast majority probably wouldn't be capable of doing anything with her.
People are better with certain characters, and people who don't play top tier characters are either purposefully limiting themselves, or using the character they feel they have the greatest potential with. Axe is a great player, but Armada is better . His ability to read other players, his spacing, his technical skill... it's all part of why he's a great player.
Honestly, Axe is amazing because of what he did and with a low tier character, but people need to get real.
Pretty much what I said. Meh.@rhan and thegooddoctor
I classified being a fan of the series as love of the character.
If Jiggs 100% dominates big tournaments then Darc would have came in top 5 instead of Axe/Armada at APEX or any other tourney. It's obvious that Jiggs has potential to place top 5 in tourneys but that player still has to be good. It's not just Jiggs alone.Current tier placing discussion? It depends on how we've defined the tier list. Seeing as it's based on the current metagame, you more or less have to factor in tournament results. In addition to that, matchups are the main defining characteristic.
With that said, the fact that jiggs 100% dominates big tournaments is difficult to ignore. This in addition to the fact that her only two debatable disadvantaged matchups are against marth and fox, makes her a very strong candidate for a top tier placing. Marth has next to no representation, and sheik's matchups aren't as good as jiggs as far as high tier matchups go. Fox and falco both have similarly amazing matchups to jiggs, and have huge tourney representation.
Why does it seem odd that those three would be placed as top tier?
RoM2 Results1) Dr. Pee Pee (Falco)
2) HungryBox (Jiggs)
3) l0zR (Fox)
4) Tope (Sheik)
5) Everlasting Yayuhz (Fox)
5) SleepyK (Falco)
Genesis Results1. HungryBox (Jiggs)
2. Dr. PeePee (Falco)
3. Kage (Ganon)
4. Mango (Jiggs)
5. Jman (Fox)
5. Darc (Jiggs)
APEX 2010 Results1. Mango (Jiggs/Falco)
2. Armada (Peach)
3. Hungrybox (Jiggs)
4. Zhu (Falco/Fox)
5. Mew2King (Marth/Sheik)
Just a little list of the top 5 from recent big tourneys.1: hungrybox (Jiggs)
2: Armada (Peach)
3: mew2king (Marth/Fox)
4: Dr. Peepee (Falco)
5: Axe (Pikachu)
It would be interesting but I don't see why he would want to gimp himself from placing Top 3 consistently lol.meh, darc did pretty terribly at Apex, and raistlin was definitely a once in a lifetime fluke, i havent heard anything from him in a year.
I really want to see hbox pick up another character, it would be interesting to see how that would go