Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Use Smashboards links to get your gaming stuff and support the site, Super Smash Bros. Ultimate, GameCube Controller Super Smash Bros. Ultimate Edition, Nintendo Super Smash Bros. Ultimate Edition Pro Controller - Switch, a Nintendo Switch Super Smash Bros. Ultimate Edition - Switch or a Poké Ball Plus.
In case you guys didn't notice, that was actually that guy's very first post. :embarrass:It's funny cause it was actually the 4th post
Wait. Did you seriously just quote a post from the 1st page?
+1Does being a smart player really take away from a character's viability though? I mean, all it means is that you can use those character's tools REALLY well and thus that character has that potential.
Of course, if other characters haven't gotten up to that point, which is the point I think you're making, then you'd argue we shouldn't factor it in. But on the other hand, should we really take in to account something we can't measure? And remember that the tier list is only reflective of our current meta-game, not one in the future.
ESAM and Vinnie are the two people who actually prove that ICs are top 2.Part of the reason ICs are considered top 2 in the game now compared to before is bc of ESAM.
(referancing first paragraph vvvv)So you're telling me that ICs aren't good because their stuff is pretty hard and only a small handful can actually do all their really good stuff consistently and repeatedly in tournament at top-level? And Fox in Melee is worse than Sheik because he is tons harder to use?
But a guy has already proven that the stuff is possible so it should be considered. If no one under the sun had ever shown what he's capable of in theory, then this would make sense, but the fact that just one person has managed to do it means that it should be considered, especially if the argument is being made BY the person who's accomplishing it (and proving his points).
I agree, Ganon has rep and money. Time for Ganon to shine!So guys let's talk about how good Ganondorf is.
Specifically, how he beats the other bottom tiers solidly (lol Zelda, lol Link) and can do quite well against most of low tier.
I think it's time for a change, the Ganons have shown his strength and we simply cannot deny it any longer.
Ganon for Low tier.
Ganons a Biscuiteer! You can be one too, because eating biscuits is the thing to do! Winning and Killing is not the way! Hear what your bottom tier has to say!Ganon gets beat pretty bad vs Puff tho
that crouch + run away all game with the lead