• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Official BBR Tier List v6

Status
Not open for further replies.

NickRiddle

#negativeNick
Joined
Jan 3, 2006
Messages
9,913
Location
Florida
:laugh:

Cause of some of you smashboards guys saying D3 is bad (A lot of zss mains saying it).

So what if zss has a better matchup than a mid tier. Doesn't mean anything. D3 has a better Wario, Lucario, Snake, Marth, Peach, and Wolf matchup than Zss.

If D3 is bad, then why is he high tier and RIGHT ABOVE Zero Suit? :p
Because he destroys a lot of characters, and ZSS is much harder to use at anything but the highest level.
 

Chuee

Smash Hero
Joined
Jul 20, 2008
Messages
6,002
Location
Kentucky
:laugh:

Cause of some of you smashboards guys saying D3 is bad (A lot of zss mains saying it).

So what if zss has a better matchup than a mid tier. Doesn't mean anything. D3 has a better Wario, Lucario, Snake, Marth, Peach, and Wolf matchup than Zss.

If D3 is bad, then why is he high tier and RIGHT ABOVE Zero Suit? :p
ZSS has a better MK, Diddy, ICs, Olimar, Pikachu matchup.
 

John12346

Smash Master
Joined
Jan 24, 2009
Messages
3,534
Location
New York, NY
NNID
JohnNumbers
So Ryo got 2nd at a Florida tourney 2-0ing anyone that wasn't MK (Nick Riddle being one of those non-mks), lost to Seibrik.

Yah Ike gonna be good with MK banned
Ussi, make sure you yell at everyone involved with the production of that tourney to get the results posted.

I need more MK banned tournies for my data.
 

infiniteV115

Smash Hero
Joined
Nov 14, 2010
Messages
6,445
Location
In the rain.
I didn't put him because I heard ZSS struggles a lot with Falco too :/
It's her worst MU, and (I'd say) it's a soft counter. But I hear he gives a lot of trouble to DDD as well, which was my point. I know what you mean though.

Has anyone else considered the possibility that Snake is overrated? I mean he's definitely up there, but I'm beginning to think that we keep him so high on the list because he was like the first character to do decently against MK often, and since then he has been set in stone has 2nd/3rd. Now that I look at it, he loses to (according to MU chart) Marth, Oli, DDD, Pika, and doesn't really shut anyone down except for the characters at the very bottom of the tier list. Almost all of his advantages are rather slight, and I have trouble understanding why Falco and Marth are lower on the list.
 

Shaya

   「chase you」 
BRoomer
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
27,654
Location
/人◕‿‿◕人\ FABULOUS Max!
NNID
ShayaJP
Because while snake may be bad, he's still broken.

Broken range/hitboxes, broken damage output, broken weight, pretty mentally intensive to counter camping, and sometimes he gets a dthrow and that's like gg broken too.

Snake is the character who may lose several match ups at -1 (or maybe even -2!) but da broken factor when considering '100 matches' is hard to ignore.
 

Cassio

Smash Master
Joined
Jul 1, 2011
Messages
3,185
Because while snake may be bad, he's still broken.

Broken range/hitboxes, broken damage output, broken weight, pretty mentally intensive to counter camping, and sometimes he gets a dthrow and that's like gg broken too.

Snake is the character who may lose several match ups at -1 (or maybe even -2!) but da broken factor when considering '100 matches' is hard to ignore.
lol, this is so true
 

infiniteV115

Smash Hero
Joined
Nov 14, 2010
Messages
6,445
Location
In the rain.
It didn't make any sense to me at all.
A tier list should essentially be a (weighted of course) MU chart. This is because how 'good' a character is depends on how well that character fares against the other characters in the cast. (eg If there were a fighting game with only 1 character, it wouldn't make sense to call that character 'good' or 'bad' since you don't have any reference points)

It doesn't make sense to say that Snake is 'broken' when he doesn't have a 'broken' MU spread. Unless you're trying to imply that his 'brokenness' allows him to completely destroy everyone that he doesn't lose to, and that doesn't sound very accurate at all.
 

Wave-Guiding Hero

Smash Apprentice
Joined
Sep 13, 2011
Messages
112
Location
NorCal
There are some things about Snake that I'd agree are broken, or at least stupid (I have the opinion that whoever designed his hitboxes was high on several different drugs simultaneously) but he's not broken character-wise. Meta Knight is the only character that's broken, and look at long long it took for enough people to agree to that and actually ban him.
 

C.J.

Smash Master
Joined
Nov 30, 2008
Messages
4,102
Location
Florida
Ussi, make sure you yell at everyone involved with the production of that tourney to get the results posted.

I need more MK banned tournies for my data.
It wasn't MK banned. Also the results will be... odd. Power went out midway through pools and caused outlets not to work so went from 17+ set-ups to like... four. There was then a lot of discussion about to handle it ranging from do as much as we can of it and then split among who is left, to pay out to top 3 of each pool to 1st seed makes it out of the pool and runs an 8 man double elim tourny. So technically the payout was something ******** like:
Of the eight 1st seed:
60
30
10
However, that's not the entire pot and each of the second seeds made $15 and each of the third seeds made $5.

So have fun with that one...
 

John12346

Smash Master
Joined
Jan 24, 2009
Messages
3,534
Location
New York, NY
NNID
JohnNumbers
That sounds... really complicated.

Have it posted anyway; I'll see what I can do. The more tourney results posted, the better.
 

C.J.

Smash Master
Joined
Nov 30, 2008
Messages
4,102
Location
Florida
It was annoying, lol. But I have no idea who ran it/has the tio at all. I just know it was dumb. It was fun all the way up until the set-ups were cut into a fourth though!

/really off topic.
 

Ghostbone

Smash Master
Joined
Sep 20, 2010
Messages
4,665
Location
Australia
Snake doesn't really have any bad match-ups

Pikachu, Marth, D3 and Olimar (and MK but he doesn't count) all beat him +1, but only having 4 disadvantaged match-ups which he can overcome is really good, plus he has an advantage on almost everyone else, he's not underrated at all.
 

Cassio

Smash Master
Joined
Jul 1, 2011
Messages
3,185
tbh even for the characters that beat him, you have to be at the tippy top of that characters metagame for the advantage to hold true. Which means theres probably like, 4-8 players in total.

Consider how often snakes beat marth, pikachu, D3, and olimar. Often enough.
 

Maharba the Mystic

Smash Master
Joined
Dec 5, 2009
Messages
4,403
Location
Houston, Texas
snake has the fact that he just doesn't die that the players can live longer and get in more reads and with snakes damage output and kill power, having a brain is all that matters at that point
 

Shaya

   「chase you」 
BRoomer
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
27,654
Location
/人◕‿‿◕人\ FABULOUS Max!
NNID
ShayaJP
Don't take anything Shaya says in this thread at face value
You know me too well.
But that post was at least pseudo serious, even if it was articulated in an immature fashion.

And when I say "broken" I don't mean "diddy kong" or "meta knight broken", I just mean really overly stupid, but its most definitely manageable facets.
It's just hard to consistently handle all of snake's **** unless you trump them with gay **** like Pikachu a bit.
 

Steam

Smash Hero
Joined
Aug 30, 2009
Messages
6,322
Location
Hell, Colorado
It didn't make any sense to me at all.
A tier list should essentially be a (weighted of course) MU chart. This is because how 'good' a character is depends on how well that character fares against the other characters in the cast. (eg If there were a fighting game with only 1 character, it wouldn't make sense to call that character 'good' or 'bad' since you don't have any reference points)

It doesn't make sense to say that Snake is 'broken' when he doesn't have a 'broken' MU spread. Unless you're trying to imply that his 'brokenness' allows him to completely destroy everyone that he doesn't lose to, and that doesn't sound very accurate at all.
Problem is that matchup ratios are flawed. Everyone is biased and some care more than others. Results have no bias and show the reality over theory

:phone:
 

Raziek

Charging Limit All Day
Joined
Oct 14, 2008
Messages
9,626
Location
Halifax, Nova Scotia
NNID
Raziek
3DS FC
3866-8131-5247
Problem is that matchup ratios are flawed. Everyone is biased and some care more than others. Results have no bias and show the reality over theory

:phone:
Except that results don't have the most important facet of a match-up ratio: Assuming the players are equal in skill. That's near impossible to correctly quantify when looking at results, since the best you can do is "Well, they're pretty close, but X might not know the match-up as well as Y, blah blah blah"
 

#HBC | Red Ryu

Red Fox Warrior
Joined
Jun 15, 2008
Messages
27,486
Location
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
NNID
RedRyu_Smash
3DS FC
0344-9312-3352
1. It's not a technicality. I go to america fairly often, and I haven't lived in EU that long :|
2. I dare you to actually talk like that to my face LOL.

Here, I'll give you a summary of myself in smash despite you being a ****face.

I go to america at least twice a year for about a month in the winter and summer. I've only lived in Europe for about a year now. The amount of smash tournaments i've attended in europe also have only been a handfull (maybe 5% or something at best in comparison to my US tournament experience).

Before I moved to EU in the summer of last year I was ranked 4th in New Jersey under ADHD, Atomsk, and Nairo (and the wins between me/atmsk/nairo where very close, lol keitaro was having a hard time making placings). Currently I'm ranked 2nd in Holland. I'm probably top 5 overall in EU as far as players that travel go. But it's hard to judge me vs a lot of people because we simply never play, and it's very clear they are all capable of competing. I haven't played calzorz/anaky/kasper, luigi player, greward, gluttony, deimos, the list goes on.

I started off brawl maining falco/marth for tournament play (although my first few tournaments where actually fox but whatever). I realized that MK fit me // was a much better option than marth pretty early on, so I mained falco and went MK and occasionally diddy for the bad matchups. Somewhere later on the line I started just playing both and just switched to MK due to getting a lot of ditto experience from M2K. For a while I seconded Ice climbers, and snake and at one point was ranked with all 4 characters.

My last year in America slowly became more MK central and he really solidified as my main. Recently I've been playing falco a lot, however there aren't much tournaments so I've only been able to use him to actually help me beat someone I wouldn't otherwise once out of the 3 I've attended in the past 5 months or so.

Most of my player influences and practical experience are from
Teh Spammer, Atomsk, M2K, Neo, Mr.R and ADHD.

I've only won 2 tournaments, both where in America. I also commonly have gone on and off playing wifi since brawl came out. I tend to SD a lot when I choke or if I get frustrated. I practice tech skill a lot. I don't know if I am anymore, I shouldn't be. But I used to be known for playing super defensive and timing people out.

Pretty much covers anything you should ever need to know. LMAO
idk why I even wrote this bored as ****. 6am here and I can't sleep xD
I liked reading this.

What differences do you see with the American metagame and Europe when you moved at first?

Lucario and Toon Link shouldn't be so high. Zamus is good, but she should drop 2 ranks at the very most. As for Rob and Pit - two of the most underrated characters in the game, I would switch their positions with Lucario and Toon Link. Ike should also gain a few ranks.
You want them under, Kirby, DK, Peach, Wolf, Fox, G&W, Zamus, and DeDeDe.

I can see Luc under D3 and Zamus, not the rest. Nor why Pit and RoB need a jump like that.
 

Tesh

Smash Hero
Joined
Oct 28, 2008
Messages
9,737
Location
TX
Problem is that matchup ratios are flawed. Everyone is biased and some care more than others. Results have no bias and show the reality over theory

:phone:
Except that results don't have the most important facet of a match-up ratio: Assuming the players are equal in skill. That's near impossible to correctly quantify when looking at results, since the best you can do is "Well, they're pretty close, but X might not know the match-up as well as Y, blah blah blah"
Lets not forget that this happens in matchup discussions too. People weigh in even though they don't know the matchup or only have practice vs someone horrible. I've seen it often enough to know that there still isn't any "equal skill" in forum discussions. Its just alot harder to prove to people that they are wrong.
 

Doc King

Smash Lord
Joined
Aug 16, 2010
Messages
1,790
Because he destroys a lot of characters, and ZSS is much harder to use at anything but the highest level.
D3 is actually harder to use because of like buffered Pivot grab and dash dance pivot grab infinite on Yoshi. Also you would need to read correctly to tech chase the lightweights (Pika is pretty easy imo).
ZSS has a better MK, Diddy, ICs, Olimar, Pikachu matchup.
LOL! MK doesn't matter anymore. D3 wins because he has 6 better matchups while Zero Suit has 4.
I don't know how bad the DDD:Falco MU is, but if it's as bad as I hear it is, then ZSS has the better Falco MU as well LOL
D3 vs. Falco is pretty bad for D3 according to the current unity ruleset. Without Ledge Grab Limit, the matchup becomes much better for D3 (No lie).
I didn't put him because I heard ZSS struggles a lot with Falco too :/
That's true. They both suck against Falco. Falco is too gud for them.
It's her worst MU, and (I'd say) it's a soft counter. But I hear he gives a lot of trouble to DDD as well, which was my point. I know what you mean though.

Has anyone else considered the possibility that Snake is overrated? I mean he's definitely up there, but I'm beginning to think that we keep him so high on the list because he was like the first character to do decently against MK often, and since then he has been set in stone has 2nd/3rd. Now that I look at it, he loses to (according to MU chart) Marth, Oli, DDD, Pika, and doesn't really shut anyone down except for the characters at the very bottom of the tier list. Almost all of his advantages are rather slight, and I have trouble understanding why Falco and Marth are lower on the list.
I think he's just overrated because ppl still say he's broken when imo he's nowhere near broken. Still a top player, but not an overdominant machine. His air combat is just too crappy.
Because while snake may be bad, he's still broken.

Broken range/hitboxes, broken damage output, broken weight, pretty mentally intensive to counter camping, and sometimes he gets a dthrow and that's like gg broken too.

Snake is the character who may lose several match ups at -1 (or maybe even -2!) but da broken factor when considering '100 matches' is hard to ignore.
That makes no sense at all.
 

rm88

Smash Ace
Joined
Jul 14, 2005
Messages
830
NNID
Rm88Go
3DS FC
5241-1973-5614
Snake is somewhat broken, yes. He's a really safe character with several ridiculous properties that are not really held back by him not being a great aerial character. Having 4-5 "bad" (-1 MUs are NOT bad, you spoiled top tier mains) MUs doesn't mean a lot in my opinion.
 

Doc King

Smash Lord
Joined
Aug 16, 2010
Messages
1,790
Well Diddy and Marth have the same thing as Snake does, but with less -1 matchups.
 

#HBC | Red Ryu

Red Fox Warrior
Joined
Jun 15, 2008
Messages
27,486
Location
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
NNID
RedRyu_Smash
3DS FC
0344-9312-3352
Shaya is saying despite a lot of people saying Snakes sucks around here.

They seem to forget the things that make him A tier in the first place.

Well Diddy and Marth have the same thing as Snake does, but with less -1 matchups.
While true, Snake has a lot more hard advantages as opposed to even or slightly in his favor.
 

Maharba the Mystic

Smash Master
Joined
Dec 5, 2009
Messages
4,403
Location
Houston, Texas
Doc King, Zss always has been and always will be infinitely harder to play as than DDD. the fact that he has like one hard to pull off AT doesn't mean he isn't easy as **** to use in general gameplay. Zss requires much more overall difficult tactics in her game play.
 

infiniteV115

Smash Hero
Joined
Nov 14, 2010
Messages
6,445
Location
In the rain.
I can see Luc under D3 and Zamus, not the rest.
I don't think Lucario should be under either. Dedede should move under ZSS, and the placement of Lucario and ZSS after that doesn't really matter. I could see them being tied, actually.

And I'm pretty sure every character is harder to play than Dedede.
 

Doc King

Smash Lord
Joined
Aug 16, 2010
Messages
1,790
Doc King, Zss always has been and always will be infinitely harder to play as than DDD. the fact that he has like one hard to pull off AT doesn't mean he isn't easy as **** to use in general gameplay. Zss requires much more overall difficult tactics in her game play.
It's not just one AT. It's a few actually, along with some other stuff. Buffered Pivot grab we all know is extremely hard to pull off. Dash Dance Pivot Grab involves some tech skill (Really depends on the character and stage). Tech chasing does involve reacting quickly (Really depends on character and stage).

His top and high tier matchups involve hard play. Like trying to make use out of Diddy's Bananas, tech chasing lightweights, strategies on separating the climbers, etc.
I don't think Lucario should be under either. Dedede should move under ZSS, and the placement of Lucario and ZSS after that doesn't really matter. I could see them being tied, actually.

And I'm pretty sure every character is harder to play than Dedede.
Do you really think that :metaknight: is harder to play than D3? Also I don't think that Zss should be above or even with D3 because D3's strategies are just better. D3 should move above Lucario. Lucario's traction can make it easy to combo, which can affect his aura play like Diddy, D3, Fox, Wolf, and also how upward slopes can badly affect him. Lucario also has a hard time with heavy hitters like Snake and D3. Also just the fact that you have to gain damage just to get stronger, ppl can adapt to this and anyone who can kill early is gonna have an easier time against Lucario.

D3 imo should be the low section of the top tier.
 

Steam

Smash Hero
Joined
Aug 30, 2009
Messages
6,322
Location
Hell, Colorado
Except that results don't have the most important facet of a match-up ratio: Assuming the players are equal in skill. That's near impossible to correctly quantify when looking at results, since the best you can do is "Well, they're pretty close, but X might not know the match-up as well as Y, blah blah blah"
Can you even quantify equal skill for matchup discussions? Some characters are harder to play than others.

Top level results show how good a character is at top level. Which is what a tier list represents. If anything, the top level results should be dictating our matchup charts and tier lists provided there is enough data

:phone:

@doc- solo d3 never places though. And this is largely due to his numerous bad match ups. Lucario only has a handful to worry about and has shown to be effective solo at high levels
 

Maharba the Mystic

Smash Master
Joined
Dec 5, 2009
Messages
4,403
Location
Houston, Texas
zss is one the hardest characters to use in this entire game. D3 is one of the easiest. the 2 grab things you mentioned don't even matter because one is impossible and one is impractical. D3's metagame consist of the CG, ftilt and dtilt spacing, using bair a lot, and edgeguarding. tech chasing? that's a reading game. zss is someone who always needs perfect spacing and timing in every move she makes. unlike DDD she doesn't live forever so she has to be played more carefully. however when you master all the hard **** she has like riddle and dakpo and the other guy, zss is an amazing character. however, even though they are good at it, doesn't make it any less hard than it does make D3 any less easy to use.


as xyro would say

DEAL WITH IT
 

Hippieslayer

Smash Ace
Joined
Aug 12, 2008
Messages
959
Location
Azeroth
zss is one the hardest characters to use in this entire game. D3 is one of the easiest. the 2 grab things you mentioned don't even matter because one is impossible and one is impractical. D3's metagame consist of the CG, ftilt and dtilt spacing, using bair a lot, and edgeguarding. tech chasing? that's a reading game. zss is someone who always needs perfect spacing and timing in every move she makes. unlike DDD she doesn't live forever so she has to be played more carefully. however when you master all the hard **** she has like riddle and dakpo and the other guy, zss is an amazing character. however, even though they are good at it, doesn't make it any less hard than it does make D3 any less easy to use.


as xyro would say

DEAL WITH IT
This is why DDD is better : D
 

infiniteV115

Smash Hero
Joined
Nov 14, 2010
Messages
6,445
Location
In the rain.
Oh, so 4 people can tech chase. Now it makes sense.

Doc, you make it sound like Dedede is the only character that can read moves.
inb4wolfsnakeganon
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom