Javon89
Smash Ace
Snake not moving down is weird, Bowser got roflpwned.
Mario moving up (if that is up) I didn't see coming.
Mario moving up (if that is up) I didn't see coming.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Not if you play smart and don't put yourself in those positions. Fox get's gayed by some of those infinites as well. In fact, Wolf has the overall better MU ratio. Wolf has tools to fight his bad MU's. Wolf has better tournament results. Kain even WON a tournament recently.because he gets gayed by possibly any infinite in this game.
Crow even posted a mid-tier results post, so the BBR is aware that Wolf is getting good results. It's just like you said. They don't care enough to acknowledge him.the only infinate wolf has to look out for is DDD's sheik isnt used enough to be considered a threat and sheik sucks just as much as wolf does anyways.
wolf has the ability to outspace and out manoeuver DDD all he wants in the matchup and even though its incredibly tough he can still pull out a win.
pika is dangerous too but i really dont feel like getting into it cause i'm tired of arguing with people who wont let 2008 go and realize that all characters change, look at fox, he gets gayed just as much, but "potential" matters i guess.
like i said, wolf is where he should be, but it seems like at this point his results (which are good, not amazing) are getting ignored
Brawl Tier List 6.0:I thought people would transform to zelda if they got knocked really far offstage in melee to recover. Seems that they used zelda just as much as sheik mains do in brawl (ie; almost never).
Oh god i hope you're joking.I thought people would transform to zelda if they got knocked really far offstage in melee to recover. Seems that they used zelda only a bit less than sheik mains do in brawl (ie; almost never).
Wynaut?No more LT tourneys. =[
I actually disagree slightly with what was said about Melee in this post. They SHOULD be ranked as one character as well in Melee - the option to switch is there, should the player wish to use it. However, it's basically implicit that Zelda/Sheik would go just above Sheik in Melee, since Zelda is so much worse than Sheik in that game. Melee doesn't omit the combination because Zelda isn't beneficial for Sheik per se... it's because the combination's position is already captured in Sheik's position.... You're apparently too good to read the write-up about Zelda/Sheik?
And what does Melee have to do with Brawl? The Melee tier list has NOTHING to do with the Brawl tier list. ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. Care to tell me WHY we should take the Melee tierlist into consideration when making a tierlist for Brawl?
But if you're already bringing in Melee:
In Melee, Sheik is Top Tier. Zelda is Bottom Tier. There is no real advantage if you switch from Sheik to Zelda.
Both are handled as separate characters with no Down B because there is no reason to switch to Zelda. Zelda doesn't benefit Sheik at all in Melee.
In Brawl, Sheik is Mid Tier and Zelda is Low Tier. However, there are certain matchups in which Zelda actually is beneficial to Sheik. For instance, against chaingrabbers, who have more trouble chaingrabbing Zelda.
Valueing Zelda and Sheik as own characters but also as combination does make sense in this game.
Brawl is NOT Melee.
There's no way to be right or wrong when the topic at hand is entirely subjective. When I said accurate, I meant to say "closest representation of the evidence given." The evidence being matchups, tourney performance, stats, etc. Sorry for the confusion.just because alot of peope agree on something does not make it right, the ruleset will change new players coming in blah blah blah this is far from finalised they thought melee's tier list was going to be the last and then they released another
Lol@bowser ****** low tier, he doesnt even beat a lot of low tier characters, and isnt even good
i like the list though
These.No.
We have failed Captain Falcon.
:embarrassBrawl Tier List 6.0:
I like it, I want them to add it to the character icon list under user cp details!The sprite for Zelda/Sheik is really creepy btw.. Reminds me of some kind of Cyborg.
That was kinda how it was explained to me. Granted, I don't know jack about Melee, so if I am wrong, I'm sorry.[big post which I don't wanna quote because it's so big, just click the arrow icon and it will lead you to that post, although it's pretty obvious which one I mean]
Tier list =/= Tournament resultsrly tho doesnt gannon have better results than like 5 characters above him. why is he in his own tire thats ********
Thank you, I'm glad you like it, I tried my best, although it's been a while since I made it.I like it, I want them to add it to the character icon list under user cp details!
I like this idea.I like it, I want them to add it to the character icon list under user cp details!
They should definitely be taken into account, though. They are proof that players are able to do well with their character.Tier list =/= Tournament results
i don't want this just to be answered (like i wanted to the last 2 pages), i want someone to answer it AND tell me how clearly it was stated in the original BBR voting thread for this tier listThey should definitely be taken into account, though. They are proof that players are able to do well with their character.
What was taken into account when making this list? MU ratios? A single good players performance of a character? Ugh...."Potential"?
You know what's just as important as tourney results? Popularity. The more popular a character, the more people that use him in different ways, thus the more people learn how to get around his stuff and beat him, which brings us to his not-as-amazing-as-before tourney results. More people have played against Snakes, than Snakes have played against any other single character, excluding MK of course... That's how I saw it anyway.They should definitely be taken into account, though. They are proof that players are able to do well with their character.
What was taken into account when making this list? MU ratios? A single good players performance of a character? Ugh...."Potential"?
I see were Bowsers failing now LOL.You know what's just as important as tourney results? Popularity. The more popular a character, the more people that use him in different ways,