MechaWave
Smash Champion
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2009
- Messages
- 2,227
It's what happens when you have limited knowledge of a subject.you post that like communism is evil.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
It's what happens when you have limited knowledge of a subject.you post that like communism is evil.
Will you go back to playing Bowser?Mk is now banned. Anyone who ever won with Mk: your wins have become completely invalidated. Congratulations.
![]()
you post that like communism is evil./
communism isn't necessarily evil, just misguided. It could never work. It doesn't provide the right incentives. have you ever heard of the free-rider principle?It's what happens when you have limited knowledge of a subject.
AgreedMy view on this is that the TO should decide on the ruleset. This is effectively the case, but the existence of things like Unity and MBR discourage creative rulesets and (even justifiably) going against the norm.
But the TO does decide the Ruleset in this case... You have a point about a collection of TO's having a unified Ruleset discouraging the creation of creative ones, but people do that already.My view on this is that the TO should decide on the ruleset. This is effectively the case, but the existence of things like Unity and MBR discourage creative rulesets and it discourages even justifiably going against the norm.
Oh so you reply to ME for that response.communism isn't necessarily evil, just misguided. It could never work. It doesn't provide the right incentives. have you ever heard of the free-rider principle
True and the URC, all of them being TOs, decided to ban MK. Juu was right too, if you don't like the URC you don't have to follow them, people were holding MK banned tournies before he was even banned officially. So basically you're free to do whatever, but the more prominent TOs, the URC, are going to be going by the MK ban decision.My view on this is that the TO should decide on the ruleset. This is effectively the case, but the existence of things like Unity and MBR discourage creative rulesets and (even justifiably) going against the norm.
the things that work are called socialist. and even those are debatable, but at least more acceptable.there are some things that works with communism, and some things that dont.
Truth.Slowly getting off-topic...
well said.Not everything is equal. Everyone knows MK is a superior character. Everyone also knows that while less so, Falco, Diddy, Marth, Wario and Snake are also superior characters and people try and do well against these superior characters as well.
Above all, you can still compete against MK for as long as you want. Now people who want MK can play TO instead of armchair TO and organize what they believe is right instead of the opposite being true.
![]()
ThisThis isn't to say anything about the actual decision made. Rather, I'm a little worried by what factors into making the decision.
me to XDSame here, great work Mike.
![]()
Is it LOLWhy did you make this video? I dont get it. 99% of it is WRONG.
How is the general community supposed to view that?The URC and the BBR view mk the same way(read the BBR posts in the URC group).
If you honestly think overcentralization, dominating character, scrub tactics, planking, scrub attitudes, ****ty community attitude and players focusing on bull**** will change after MK is banned you're ********.Next, you have the obvious centralization of mk.....in every way. Whether its 1st place wins, results domination and most money won.....ect. We had to ban stages cause of mk, make rules JUST to keep him legal(and he STILL dominates). The point is, this game/scene/community FOCUSES on mk and this is unhealthy for all 3 and stops/slows growth. Banning mk undoes EVERYTHING i mentioned above and PROMOTES growth.
Ironic, because you're thereAlso, not anybody can get into the URC
It's not everybody... Mind you a lot of people get in I don't agree with. And some dont that I do. But that's how it works. Taking personal strikes at alex strife, someone Obviously qualified to be in there, and has multiple problems in life outside of smash is disgusting.(unlike the bbr where EVERYBODY gets let in at some point lol alex strife has been in and out like 3-4 times LOLOLOLOL)
It was definitely like, host two unity tournaments and we like you XDand i dont know why u twists the requirements of getting into the URC. Had this been the case we would have many many many more members in the URC.
It's to show that you're clearly not figure heads, or good representatives in the community at this pointLast, why would you ask people if they knew members of the URC? That has nothing to do with anything. Come on Mike, your better than this.
It's either you run the current Unity Rules as your tournament's ruleset or your tourney gets limited sponsorship by the higher echelons (a.k.a. lack of a sticky). The URC rules that have Metaknight banned are considered the default, de facto ruleset that's "officially" sanctioned here on the boards.But people have choices... Choices not to run URC tournaments, choices to run URC tourneys with MK allowed.
I don't understand why you had this knee-jerk reaction without reading everything.
![]()
But what happens if 75% of the community thinks their opinions don't matter?It's either you run the current Unity Rules as your tournament's ruleset or your tourney gets limited sponsorship by the higher echelons (a.k.a. lack of a sticky). The URC rules that have Metaknight banned are considered the default, de facto ruleset that's "officially" sanctioned here on the boards.
It may not seem like a big deal to you, but when you can't even get a small lift like that because you don't follow those rules to the letter, that kinda makes the concept of a "choice" pointless. If you want your tourney to be the one that's promoted here on the site, you have to follow THOSE rules.
It also promotes divisiveness. Despite the lofty number of "seventy-five percent," you're still alienating (and by extension, ostracizing) about a quarter of the community (if we were to follow the figure that was supposedly collected by the URC). That's quite a sizable chunk there.
Smooth Criminal
Majority rules.But what happens if 75% of the community thinks their opinions don't matter?
i like 3 or so characters dominating than just one.Yo Brawl, Ima let you finish, but Marvel vs Capcom 2 is the most unbalanced fighting game in history.
Seriously, there were only 3 real characters in that game, along with 9000 others and you didn't see them banned.
Yes, but did you see how fast it died once MvC3 came out?Yo Brawl, Ima let you finish, but Marvel vs Capcom 2 is the most unbalanced fighting game in history.
Seriously, there were only 3 real characters in that game, along with 9000 others and you didn't see them banned.
Magneto, Storm, Sentinel, Cable, Cyclops, Psylocke, Captain Commando. The first 3 are in the highest tier but that doesn't mean the other characters were unusable.Yo Brawl, Ima let you finish, but Marvel vs Capcom 2 is the most unbalanced fighting game in history.
Seriously, there were only 3 real characters in that game, along with 9000 others and you didn't see them banned.
Understandable, SC. I would like to say to that though that there's already a sense of divisiveness that separates both TOs and their organized tournaments and that's permeated long before the URC was even created or "established" as the go-to for tournaments.It's either you run the current Unity Rules as your tournament's ruleset or your tourney gets limited sponsorship by the higher echelons (a.k.a. lack of a sticky). The URC rules that have Metaknight banned are considered the default, de facto ruleset that's "officially" sanctioned here on the boards.
It may not seem like a big deal to you, but when you can't even get a small lift like that because you don't follow those rules to the letter, that kinda makes the concept of a "choice" pointless. If you want your tourney to be the one that's promoted here on the site, you have to follow THOSE rules.
It also promotes divisiveness. Despite the lofty number of "seventy-five percent," you're still alienating (and by extension, ostracizing) about a quarter of the community (if we were to follow the figure that was supposedly collected by the URC). That's quite a sizable chunk there.
Smooth Criminal
And then of course Strider/Doom.Magneto, Storm, Sentinel, Cable, Cyclops, Psylocke, Captain Commando. The first 3 are in the highest tier but that doesn't mean the other characters were unusable.
Good **** for keeping Finland erased though.
That's not true. Diddy Kong, Falco, Pikachu, Olimar, King Dedede, Lucario, and Zero Suit can play pretty aggressively in Brawl.hahaha I love this. Brawl is dying, and what's left of the community is tearing itself apart from the inside.
There were people saying Brawl is garbage from the very beginning, amongst all the hype, and history has ****ing vindicated us.
Metaknight was the only character who could remotely be played in an aggressive way in the camp-fest that is Brawl, and now he is banned. Good **** guys.
Lol, sorry. I have the "Republic vs. Democracy" debate three times a week in class, and decided against having it online as well.Everything I just read just made me legit lol.
Also, that video was entertaining. NOW, granted I disagree with him completely but he brings up points. At the same time, a great deal of your information is completely wrong. Wish you would have actually posted like more than 4 times so we could discuss your viewpoint instead if doing this. lol Oh well.
MK is also oficially Banned in Costa Rica, Colombia and Venezuela. Just Sayin...![]()
This better?
And I don't see anywhere written that Australia is included in the MK ban.
This is a true statement.MK is also oficially Banned in Costa Rica, Colombia and Venezuela. Just Sayin...
http://www.smashbrosla.com/index.php?/topic/353-colombia-1er-torneo-antimk-barranquilla/
And with the USA ban, it will be probably banned soon in more contries.
dabuz likes this postbtw, still going through every post in this thread
7 people coming back
2 people quitting