Can people actually read posts instead of assuming idiocy? I never said anything about reacting to a tech cahse or read, everything I said was about timing. You lie on the ground and you wait for Ganon to do something, contratry to the stupidity you just posted you are the one reacting to him, not the other way around. Kage may very well be a better player than me, but I'm certain I can beat him because as I said, I **** Ganons. However Kage is a it overrated because of his palcement at rom1; KDJ has been retired for over, Azen had been retired over 6 months and Jman is vastly overrated. Kage placing top 4 in his country means nothing. Since 2007 I have always placed top 2 in my country

, please don't be retardeed and assume that because you haven't heard of me it means I haven't accomplished anything. You haven't herd of me because you are the sterotypical ignorant american smasher who knows nothing of the Smash scene outside of developed countries.
Why would you even be on the ground in the first place? Did he dair you in the air? Whatever. So you're lying there on the ground. Doing nothing. What do you do if he just waits? If you get up he can most likely grab you, jab you, wizard kick you, dair you, or fair you just based on reaction. If you roll away you get grabbed or fair'd from reaction. If you roll toward him he can bair or dair you, again on reaction. If you get up attack, you get shield-grabbed. We can play Super Theory Bros. all over the place, but the easiest way to settle this is for you to MM Kage at Pound 4 if you don't meet in pools or bracket (if you and Kage both make it that far) and have it recorded.
What country are you even from? Why does Kage placing top 4, most of which is top 2, at every tourney he goes to in Canada (a country that has 34 million people, and has a decent smash scene) mean nothing, while you placing top 2 in a country you have yet to disclose (and likely has a smaller population and a less organized smash scene for an NTSC country if we haven't heard of it) does? Serious question.
People would probably be more apt to argue any of your points if you wouldn't constantly attempt to insult their intelligence (seriously, it's at least 20-30% of your posts).
I was in no way, form or fashion implying it means the match up was in ICs fover. If you took the time to read the thread you would see that Euphoria stated that there is nothing an ICs player can do against a great Fox because his agility and shine locks down all the options the ICs can use. I was just pointing out that Chu did beat great Foxes therefore the match up cannot be as bad as he is insisting. And you're dumb for assuming it means Chu knows that match up better, Jman and Cactuar could have known the match up just as well but Chu was still able to win because the match up doesn't favor Fox that greatly. Quit using *** logic n00b.
....
Jman and Cactuar use Fox. One of the most popular and most used characters. Chu Dat uses Ice Climbers. A very unpopular character whom only 3 or 4 players use and place well with. Chu Dat's opportunity for experience against Fox players is nearly infinitely higher than that of Jman or Cactuar's opportunity for experience against Ice Climber's players.
This chart isn't about "the best [character 1] vs. the best [character 2], what's the ratio," because again that would be influenced by character popularity, a player's opportunity to gain experience in the match-up, and, most importantly of all, player skill. For example (and IMO), Mango has a better Puff than Mew2King has a Marth or Fox, or Armada has a Peach. His player skill skews the data that can be extracted about the match-ups from his results. He or any other player doing well against a character doesn't mean that Jigglypuff's match-up against that character isn't bad. It simply means that Mango or other Jigglypuff players are very good at the match-up, and can overcome the match-up disadvantage because player skill players a much larger part in high level play than match-ups do.
In addition, tournament results/matches cannot always be assessed for match-up data. This is because many players do not want or enjoy playing "gay," and would rather play in a fashion that isn't exactly the best, due to personal choice. For example, I don't think Chu wobbles, despite the fact that it's a good technique and is infinitely better than any other option IC's has in a situation that IC's can wobble (in singles, at least). I haven't seen the matches of Chu vs. Jman/Cactuar (I don't even know if they were recorded), but I'm willing to bet that neither of them took advantage of the strategy that Europhoria described.
Also, a 6-4 match-up isn't very bad at all. It's a disadvantage, but not that large of one. Chu Dat has had
years of experience against top level foxes (PC Chris, Mew2King, Chillen, etc.), while the only experience Jman or Cactuar can really get against a top level IC's is Chu Dat and, to an extent, Wobbles. Wobbles doesn't travel to the EC all too often as far as I know.
Top level [character 1]'s doing badly against top level [character 2]'s doesn't mean that [character 2] has a good match-up against [character 1], it means that top level [character 1]'s do badly against top level [character 2]'s for some reason or another. You seem to be misinterpreting the point of the match-up chart in general, really.
Please, VBM, actually read this post & attempt to argue against its points, rather than simply saying "you're an ignorant american and you missed my point [which is probably because I'm bad at making a point, but... that's besides the point!!!] so you're dumb," and not addressing most of them. But you probably won't anyway.