Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
She can't get out if we time it perfectly, only if we screw up can she flip kick out.Sorry, one last thing on ZSS. I think she can flip-jump (down+b) out of Falco's chaingrab.
And I have a question, when you guys chain ZSS, do you do the walking or running one?
and uh, I think you mean BPG (boost pivot grab.) From what I gather, you mixed DACUS and BPG into one name. =p Also, it technically shouldn't be more effective.However, I found doing the dash attack upsmash cancel pivot grab (phew, mouthful) chain a lot more effective.
Next discussion I suggest Ice Climbers to get that out of the way. That'll be a landmark posting for Falco players to decide on whether they NEED a secondary or not... in my opinion.
Lol thx. I had a feeling that what I called it was way off.Originally posted by Hyo
and uh, I think you mean BPG (boost pivot grab.) From what I gather, you mixed DACUS and BPG into one name. =p Also, it technically shouldn't be more effective.
I used to think the same way but actually ICs vs. falco actually isn't as bad as people think it's actually not that hard to separate nana and popo the trouble I really have is killing them off quickly plus once they finish the blizzard attack you can hit them with the side b
If you plan on playing the IC's, then you need a secondary. There's not much we can do to them aside from camp with lasers and IAP, and even then we have to be careful because Nana will take a lot of the laser hits and Blizzard goes right through the Phantasm.
IE: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GbLZu74I39gI used to think the same way but actually ICs vs. falco actually isn't as bad as people think it's actually not that hard to separate nana and popo the trouble I really have is killing them off quickly plus once they finish the blizzard attack you can hit them with the side b
then again going MK vs. ICs is far more easier
The chart is VERY OLD. So I'm not exactly sure.I see a 55:45 matchup on Lucario, but no thread. How was this determined?
I suggest working on Sonic's match-up next. One of the toughest imo.
if they do that then you could full jump behind then and bair which will hit the ice climber doing the blizzardThat actually depends on how they Blizzard. if they do it like this (around 2:46 in the vid), I'm not sure you can.
Well, according to the first post in this thread, we have it as 65-35 for kirby.Is Kirby really that bad for Falco? Their boards have it as only a 60:40 advantage for Kirby.
Many people find it to be the Ice Climbers (i.e. the "hopeless" matchup.) Other worst matchups include Kirby. The first numbers are Falco's, but that chart is outdated. I would fix it in my spare time, but I can't locate the new chart that people have made for matchups, and Blad01 isn't changing it.can you just tell me one thing, who is falcos worst matchup, and at the chart at the beginning, are falco's numbers on the left or right?
Because the chart is old and unupdated.If you don't mind me asking, why does it say on the chart in the OP that Falco goes even with Ice Climbers and Meta Knight?
I thought it was agreed upon that he loses miserably to both.
Where is the King Dedede discussion?
I think I'm going to use Falco for him.
Why do you guys have G&W as a bad match up for Falco. he's so easy to punish. I'm just saying as a G&W and falco main, falco is better and can beat him pretty hard.