• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Match-Up Discussion ~ Final Week Ganon/Falcon/Link >__>

Status
Not open for further replies.

Crackle

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Messages
497
Location
UCLA
NNID
ZZZobac
Next discussion I suggest Ice Climbers to get that out of the way. That'll be a landmark posting for Falco players to decide on whether they NEED a secondary or not... in my opinion.
 

nogalicious

Smash Cadet
Joined
Mar 24, 2008
Messages
28
Location
Southern California
Sorry, one last thing on ZSS. I think she can flip-jump (down+b) out of Falco's chaingrab. However, I found doing the dash attack upsmash cancel pivot grab (phew, mouthful) chain a lot more effective.

edit:

Also, Falco is vulnerable to a ZSS chaingrab in the early percents, which can lead to some massive combos.

And I have a question, when you guys chain ZSS, do you do the walking or running one?
 

Hyo

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Mar 1, 2008
Messages
246
Location
Canada
Sorry, one last thing on ZSS. I think she can flip-jump (down+b) out of Falco's chaingrab.

And I have a question, when you guys chain ZSS, do you do the walking or running one?
She can't get out if we time it perfectly, only if we screw up can she flip kick out.
And, I personally walk the CG. There's a list somewhere of characters you should run chain, and I don't remember who is on it. Pikachu I think, but not too many.

However, I found doing the dash attack upsmash cancel pivot grab (phew, mouthful) chain a lot more effective.
and uh, I think you mean BPG (boost pivot grab.) From what I gather, you mixed DACUS and BPG into one name. =p Also, it technically shouldn't be more effective.
 

Denzi

Smash Master
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
3,483
Location
Cleveland, OH
Next discussion I suggest Ice Climbers to get that out of the way. That'll be a landmark posting for Falco players to decide on whether they NEED a secondary or not... in my opinion.

If you plan on playing the IC's, then you need a secondary. There's not much we can do to them aside from camp with lasers and IAP, and even then we have to be careful because Nana will take a lot of the laser hits and Blizzard goes right through the Phantasm.
 

Vorguen

Smash Champion
Joined
Jun 7, 2008
Messages
2,168
Location
Vorgy = RGV = Brownsville, Texas
As ZSS Falco is my hardest matchup. It's not as easy as you think to get out of the CG, even mashing B-down. His reflector is one of the few reflectors that actually push the stun-gun laser far enough to hit ZSS again, which can be followed up with a boost smash or grab. ZSS mid-range pressure and camp game is nerfed by Falco's retreating SH lasers and shine, and it's hard to get him up in the air for a kill too. He has good aerials as well, and although maybe not necessarily more capable than ZSS in the air, he can definately keep up with her in the air as well.
 

nogalicious

Smash Cadet
Joined
Mar 24, 2008
Messages
28
Location
Southern California
Originally posted by Hyo
and uh, I think you mean BPG (boost pivot grab.) From what I gather, you mixed DACUS and BPG into one name. =p Also, it technically shouldn't be more effective.
Lol thx. I had a feeling that what I called it was way off.
 

DEHF

Smash Champion
Joined
Dec 14, 2006
Messages
2,261
Location
reseda CA
NNID
larrlurr

If you plan on playing the IC's, then you need a secondary. There's not much we can do to them aside from camp with lasers and IAP, and even then we have to be careful because Nana will take a lot of the laser hits and Blizzard goes right through the Phantasm.
I used to think the same way but actually ICs vs. falco actually isn't as bad as people think it's actually not that hard to separate nana and popo the trouble I really have is killing them off quickly plus once they finish the blizzard attack you can hit them with the side b

then again going MK vs. ICs is far more easier
 

Gishnak

Smash Ace
Joined
Mar 24, 2008
Messages
726
Location
San Luis Obispo

Hyo

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Mar 1, 2008
Messages
246
Location
Canada
I see a 55:45 matchup on Lucario, but no thread. How was this determined?
 

Teran

Through Fire, Justice is Served
Super Moderator
Premium
BRoomer
Joined
Oct 23, 2008
Messages
37,165
Location
Beastector HQ
3DS FC
3540-0079-4988
I suggest working on Sonic's match-up next. One of the toughest imo.

Yeah, Sonic is really hard to study from an on paper perspective. Oh well, we'll cross that bridge when we come to it.
 

Hitman JT

The Infinite One
Joined
Nov 9, 2008
Messages
1,120
Location
The Gates of Hell
NNID
JT.Hitman
3DS FC
1435-5432-6684
i'm pretty sure Falco goes even with or has the advantage on ROB...I use him to CP ROBs all the time and don't have too much trouble...
 

AvoiD

Smash Lord
Joined
Apr 26, 2008
Messages
1,441
Location
Houston, TX
NNID
AvoiDMe
Truth, Falco get's gimped way to easy by ROB. :(

Which gives him most of the game on flat stages.

Disadvantage goes well ;o.
 

RickShaw626

Smash Rookie
Joined
Oct 2, 2008
Messages
4
Location
Daly City
i havent found Rob that hard of a matchup. Its true he can easily gimp falco, but falco can avoid gimping situations.
 

Vlade

Social Outcast
Joined
May 30, 2008
Messages
4,043
Location
Perth, Western Australia
No. Falco definitely does not have the advantage against ROB.

IMO Falco vs ROB is the most boring match-up ever (except for falco dittos).
 

Hyo

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Mar 1, 2008
Messages
246
Location
Canada
So when's the next "week" going to be posted? It's been a while..
 

DEHF

Smash Champion
Joined
Dec 14, 2006
Messages
2,261
Location
reseda CA
NNID
larrlurr
That actually depends on how they Blizzard. if they do it like this (around 2:46 in the vid), I'm not sure you can.
if they do that then you could full jump behind then and bair which will hit the ice climber doing the blizzard
 

pure_awesome

Smash Lord
Joined
Sep 17, 2007
Messages
1,229
Location
Montreal, Canada
Assuming the Ice Climbers don't see Falco approaching, jumping over their Blizzard, and kicking them in the head, then yes, you could do that :laugh:

I vote that we just start talking about ICs and Blad can change it when he gets here.
 

Hitman JT

The Infinite One
Joined
Nov 9, 2008
Messages
1,120
Location
The Gates of Hell
NNID
JT.Hitman
3DS FC
1435-5432-6684
I don't have trouble avoiding ROBs gimping skillz.....
and Falco dittos are only boring when both players are CG whores. lol :$
 

AndrewCarlson

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Sep 2, 2008
Messages
367
Is Kirby really that bad for Falco? Their boards have it as only a 60:40 advantage for Kirby.
 

ftl

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Jun 4, 2008
Messages
498
Location
Champaign, IL
Is Kirby really that bad for Falco? Their boards have it as only a 60:40 advantage for Kirby.
Well, according to the first post in this thread, we have it as 65-35 for kirby.

A difference of 5... not really worth arguing over much, IMO.
 

pure_awesome

Smash Lord
Joined
Sep 17, 2007
Messages
1,229
Location
Montreal, Canada
Kirby's got a chaingrab on Falco that's decently painful and his Dair > Our Recovery.

So yeah. I agree with the Kirby boards that it's 60:40 and not 65:35, since we do such an effective job of shutting down Kirby's approaches. But hey, not that big a difference.
 

hyperhopper

Smash Ace
Joined
Nov 5, 2008
Messages
643
Location
ON MY ROOMBA!
can you just tell me one thing, who is falcos worst matchup, and at the chart at the beginning, are falco's numbers on the left or right?
 

Hyo

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Mar 1, 2008
Messages
246
Location
Canada
can you just tell me one thing, who is falcos worst matchup, and at the chart at the beginning, are falco's numbers on the left or right?
Many people find it to be the Ice Climbers (i.e. the "hopeless" matchup.) Other worst matchups include Kirby. The first numbers are Falco's, but that chart is outdated. I would fix it in my spare time, but I can't locate the new chart that people have made for matchups, and Blad01 isn't changing it.
 

M15t3R E

Smash Master
Joined
Sep 15, 2008
Messages
3,061
Location
Hangin' with Thor
If you don't mind me asking, why does it say on the chart in the OP that Falco goes even with Ice Climbers and Meta Knight?

I thought it was agreed upon that he loses miserably to both.
 

ftl

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Jun 4, 2008
Messages
498
Location
Champaign, IL
If you don't mind me asking, why does it say on the chart in the OP that Falco goes even with Ice Climbers and Meta Knight?

I thought it was agreed upon that he loses miserably to both.
Because the chart is old and unupdated.

Also, while it has been concluded that ICs have a significant advantage, the latest thoughts on MK are that it's near even, and not a 'miserable loss' by any means.
 

Hyo

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Mar 1, 2008
Messages
246
Location
Canada
Where is the King Dedede discussion?

I think I'm going to use Falco for him.

The thread seems to be lost in cyber space, but go for it: Falco is a great choice to take down King Dedede.

For one, D's giant size makes him CG fodder. CG, CG, then spike him off the screen for damage. This gives you tons of damage off the bat.

His Waddle Dees aren't too much of an issue; lasers stop them in the air. However, this means you can't camp him easily either. To over come this, IAP to a grab, jab, or smash of some kind during the lag of his toss. Falco's speed is his edge in the match.

Also, his recovery is very predictable; bair it, or dair it if you can. If you can't just laser it and he has to repeat. If you get knocked off, try your best to sweetspot the ledge. His bair will beat your phantasm, and his dees are annoying. Firebird is suicide.

His bair is somewhat of an issue, but if he's approaching with it then use lasers. He can't toss dees and bair at the same time, so you have your bases covered.

To conclude, play campy when he plays aggressive and be aggressive when he's playing campy.
 

GimR

GimR, Co-Founder of VGBootCamp
Joined
Nov 2, 2006
Messages
5,602
Location
Maryland
NNID
VGBC_GimR
Why do you guys have G&W as a bad match up for Falco. he's so easy to punish. I'm just saying as a G&W and falco main, falco is better and can beat him pretty hard.
 

Denzi

Smash Master
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
3,483
Location
Cleveland, OH
Why do you guys have G&W as a bad match up for Falco. he's so easy to punish. I'm just saying as a G&W and falco main, falco is better and can beat him pretty hard.

Sorry for the size change, but I'm hoping by making the words bigger we'll get less of this question.


The match-up chart is old and out of date.

However, most of the Falco board "regulars" know around what the match-ups are, so don't hesitate to ask us if you have any questions. Now seriously,

Don't rely on the match-up chart.
 

Blad01

Smash Lord
Joined
Mar 2, 2008
Messages
1,476
Location
Paris, France
Yeah, I'm not home right now, I will update the chart in a week or so.

Please rely on match-ups ratios :

- Falco - G&W : 40 - 60 (may change to 45 - 55)
- Falco - Kirby : 35 - 65 (may change to 40 - 60)
- Ice Climbers : 40 - 60 (used to be 50 - 50)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom