Alphicans
Smash Hero
I am no pikachu pro, but sheik and fox at the same difficulty for him seems a little bit odd.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Clearly you missed the sarcasm. =)That is entirely the wrong choice of character.
yes. I agree.Top level fox wrecks pikachu. Not as much as top level sheik, but it's still probably one of his hardest matchups. Pika can combo/gimp fox pretty decently, but he has very limited setups that are usually easy to avoid, while his setups on pikachu are pretty simple and effective. If fox knows the matchup, it's rough.
It would not. If I am understanding >>> correctly, none of pikachus matchups are that extreme. Sheik is the worst, but still >>.Would it be fair to say that Fox >> pika, but sheik >>> pika?
lol tell that to reno.sheik is incredibly stupid.
at least 80-20 for sheik.
True that. At least Pika can wreck Fox's world if she manages to get a grab.sheik is incredibly stupid.
at least 80-20 for sheik.
True that. At least Pika can wreck Fox's world if she manages to get a grab.
lol, I remember that ****.lol tell that to reno.
yeah, pika can do good **** to fox when he lands a solid hit. He can also beat out most character's moves with u-airs, but the amount of gayness that fox and sheik do to pika is just so ridiculous.True that. At least Pika can wreck Fox's world if she manages to get a grab.
Everyone edgeguards sheik pretty well, but the problem is getting her off. It feels so satasfying to u-smash sheik with pika though. Gotta grunt at her with fury.Meh. Sheik >>> Pika is fine then. I'm biased about the matchup heh.
Also Pika can wreck sheiks too with the right setup. Like there are legit combos on her and her recovery is terrible (think fox edgeguarding sheik but now he has a slightly more powerful usmash and thunder to punish her getting back on the stage).
Yes, relatively. Mario can chainthrow -> fsmash (or usmash if you refuse to DI away). He can CC->dsmash, jab->dsmash or grab. His utilt covers a lot of options, he can cape your recovery, his aerials do alright against you (though he should spend most of the time on the ground).One thing though is Mario >> Pikachu seems a bit funny. Would you consider Marth/Fox being equally difficult as Mario to face using Pikachu?
D:ahhh idk why i click this thread i hate it so much D:
Hugs via PM said:The match up is 50/50.
And I say this because it differs in three ways.
If neither character knows the match up, then it is based on who the better player is.
If just the Samus knows the match up, the Samus will usually win, no matter how much better the Fox is.
If the Fox knows the match up, the Fox will usually win, no matter how much better the Samus is.
If both players know the matchup equally well, the fox/samus will trade, unless there is a significant skill gap.
All the signs of a 50/50 matchup IMO.
Agreed, you can't really breakdown a match-up with a vague post like that. Those rules USUALLY come into play in any match-up.That was a really weak post from Hugs. I am sure he has a lot more insight on the match-up, considering how long he's been around, and how great of a samus he has. He basically said nothing right there, and if he wasn't Hugs, that post would be worth nothing.
How does the "they will trade" rule come into effect with terribly one-sided matchups?Agreed, you can't really breakdown a match-up with a vague post like that. Those rules USUALLY come into play in any match-up.
Barring the terrible characters rarely seen at tournaments....How does the "they will trade" rule come into effect with terribly one-sided matchups?
sheik would have her own >>>> for some charaters but that wouldnt be very balanced. They know whats up tho. or down XDI am no pikachu pro, but sheik and fox at the same difficulty for him seems a little bit odd.
Agreed, you can't really breakdown a match-up with a vague post like that. Those rules USUALLY come into play in any match-up.
sheik vs captain falconBarring the terrible characters rarely seen at tournaments....
It's supposed to be both characters at the top of the metagame. Maybe you could write a more in-depth look into Samus's matchups?Wait I'm reading this chart, my ideas on match ups are way off.
Are these match ups based on the metagame of character vs another character of equal skill? Or are both characters at their metagame? What's it based on?
Cuz I'd have Samus at a slight advantage vs Falco, Falcon, Peach, Doc
A slight disadvantage vs jiggs/ganon
And a disadvantage vs Marth/Sheik
So i mean, what are we going with?
it's not as bad as some people think....sheik vs captain falcon
go.
Thank you, agree totally. And I quoted that in my sig because it was so stupid, not because I agree with it haha.I'll simply go by my experience on a few match ups before I have to head out again. People usually just chime in with "well it's HugS, not Samus, otherwise Samus gets *****" which is why I refrain from posting any kind of opinions I have on match ups.
Anyways.
I believe Samus has a slight advantage on Falco. It's so hard to describe why some matches are advantageous since there is so much that goes into a match. So in the interest of communication, I'll break the matchup down into 3 crucial categories:
1. Defense
2. Offense
3. Edge game
Samus effectively shuts down Falco's offensive game with her defensive game. I'll assume that the prevention of your opponent's offense is the main purpose of a good defense. Simply put, Samus's upB out of shield stops most any effective approach Falco has in any other match up. The Falco can only hope to be able to trick the samus into mis-timing or mis-using her upB. These are artificial ways of dealing with the situation IMO, as tricks run thin. You can play rock paper scissors with a good samus and hope she can't figure out when you're grabbing/attacking. Any attack will be beaten.
If you do manage to get that first hit in, Samus has her passive defense, which involves her inability to be combo'd very well. Not that it's flawless, but it helps make this portion of the match up go into her favor.
Defense Adavntage - Samus
Offense - Clearly, falco has a better offense. He can overwhelm most any character. Samus's offense isn't the greatest, but it's better than Falco's defense. And if Falco's Defense has 1 purpose, it's to stop Samus's offense, and it won't be able to do that. Missiles aid in the approach, and once Samus is in there, it becomes a matter of outranging Falco and being able to quickly switch to defensive mode if needed. The main factor that puts this slightly in Samus's favor (IMO) is falco's ability to be combo'd. Which means that Samus need break through falco's defense only once to possibly end his stock. And if the falco is camping, Samus can close in with missiles, break through lasers with a wavedash - tilt and catch falco only once to tie up the damage, or take the stock. This is all hard, mind you, which is why most people don't even consider this an advantage for Samus. Either way, it's only a slight advantage to either no matter how you look at it.
Offense - Slight Advantage for either Falco/Samus,
3. Edge Game - It's no surprise that falco has a shoddy recovery. It's also no surprise that Samus has one of the best. So this part of the Edgegame clearly goes to Samus.
As far as edgeguarding goes, that requires some analysis. I'd have to give Samus the advantage on this one. Samus has an amazing edgeguard coupled with the fact that Falco has a terrible recovery. Limiting his options is cake. If he side-B's, ftilt. If he up B's from below, utilt. If you don't know where he's going, shoot a missile/shot to make him go where you want, then commence with the process. Falco on the other hand, must keep track of all her options. First he must get rid of the grapple, then he must stop a sweet spot, which ain't gonna happen if the Samus sweetspots perfectly. And if the falco grabs the ledge, you should still have your jump to get in anyways. This on top of the fact that's there's no distance samus can't come back from means that Samus doesn't die from falco edgeguards.
3. Advantage - Samus
So I hope that helps explain why I feel Samus has the slight advantage over falco. I don't have more time to write about other characters atm. And I could probably delve into Samus vs Falco even more, but I think this is enough.
And FYI Fletch, your sig is dumb. You can employ patient thinking/predicting in checkers or chess, the main difference between the two games is the amount of options, and chess, like Melee, most definitely delivers more options.
Peach / Ice ClimbersBarring the terrible characters rarely seen at tournaments....
Sheik is not easy to combo and kill for Falcon.it's not as bad as some people think....
Sheik is easy for him to combo and kill.
Also that match on Final, Stadium, and Cruise is not a cake walk.
Up throw knee after 80% seems pretty easy, also punishing the landing lag of Vanish if by some chance he's hogging you....Peach / Ice Climbers
Sheik / Falcon
Sheik is not easy to combo and kill for Falcon.
1)its actually exactly as bad as everyone thinks.... both sides agree on the matter (roughy 70-30)it's not as bad as some people think....
Sheik is easy for him to combo and kill.
Also that match on Final, Stadium, and Cruise is not a cake walk.
thats a joke right?Up throw knee after 80% seems pretty easy"
congratulations falcon can punish, welcome to melee. most falcons cant even return after a sheik is edgeguarding them (can happen at stupid low %'s too)also punishing the landing lag of Vanish if by some chance he's hogging you....
"
Oh lol, my mistake. I didn't think a melee player in the melee discussion would be agreeing with it. haha.Thank you, agree totally. And I quoted that in my sig because it was so stupid, not because I agree with it haha.