This is BS. Snake has arguably only a few slightly disadvantaged matchups, and Donkey Kong is definitely not among them.
Maybe I'm misinformed on DK, but the point still stands that Snake has more bad matchups then Wario, and DEFINITELY more then MK. He is far more balanced then MK in this regard.
If Meta Knight matters so much to Wario's position, then if he is gone... WHY WOULD WARIO RISE?
Simple, MK would be out of the way, Wario has an advantage vs Snake, and the only character that Wario has a remote difficulty with is Marth. Marth might take the no. 1 spot due to his only counter missing, but Wario would be a tight no. 2.
If Falco would have a **** matchup against the best character in the cast, he probably wouldn't be a High Tier character to begin with, simply because the chances that this is his only bad matchup would be nil.
If you want to be a ***** about this, check out all matchups with characters, not just Meta Knight.
Of course, if you're wanting to make a conspiracy out of this ****, then clearly, you only have to look at their matchups against Meta Knight. But then... why aren't Bowser, Sonic, Ness and other Mid and Low Tier characters that fare rather well against Meta Knight - meaning they only have a slight disadvantage - High Tiers? Going by your logic, if the matchup vs. Meta Knight would matter so extremely much, they would be at least High Tier, if not Top Tier.
Why are Marth and R.O.B. High Tier, if the Meta Knight matchup matters so much? Those two have Meta Knight (supposedly) as one of their worst or absolutely worst matchup. Considering that matchup matters oh so much and indicates where a character stands on the tier list - why are they in High Tier?
You know what? I'm ALLOWED to make a conspiracy since the Back room, that you are in, is so separate from the rest of the brawl community its disgusting. Example? You don't post everything that goes on back there. So until you make the Back room read-only to every member on this forum, you can withhold information to yourselves and thus deprive the community of information that you guys can use whenever you want or make claims to that the community knows nothing about. Post all the logs of what goes on in the backroom, or leave EVERYTHING that goes on in the backroom out of this discussion, since I am not 'allowed' to view such information.
If Falco got utterly destroyed by MK, the most common character at tournies, he wouldn't be in the S tier, he would be in the A tier with Marth, or the top of the B tier. MK is a huge deciding factor of tier placement, denying such means that either you are just bias, or you are withholding information that your not sharing, which is just as bad if not worse.
Oh, yea, right. In fact, the SBR knows that, and we just placed some characters wrong in order to make you think that some other things but how the characters fare vs. Meta Knight matters.
How should I know? I'm not PART of the backroom. If I was then maybe my replies would be much different, but since I'm NOT in the backroom like you, they are as they are.
You can look up the character discussions in the Tactical Discussion board. Do it yourself.
But I know - coming from tournament results and Sonic mains - that Meta Knight is not his hardest matchup. In fact, it's one of his easier matchups through High Tier. He has so much more trouble vs. other characters. Banning Meta Knight will not help Sonic like... at all. If you want to get more information on Sonic vs. Meta Knight, go to the Sonic boards or ask knowledgeable Sonics (Kinzer and ShadowLink are good places to go for that, for instance).
Maybe MK isn't Sonic's worse matchup, but it is his most common one. And your saying the Character discussion topic is the exact one from the Backroom? That still means little, since I can't see the entire forum.
Maybe I am misinformed on Sonic a bit, but you haven't really given a good counter example, you just say it isn't his worst. So we are both being lazy.
Counterexample please? And stop being so spiteful, Karma will destroy you mate. Your better then that.
They do matter, but ONE SINGLE matchup doesn't mean the whole tier list position. Saying that is DUMB.
Make the SBR Read-only, otherwise you can't disprove this conspiracy theory.
MK is the most common character at tournies, he has the most sway of character placement on the list, which is why it can be said it centers around him. He holds the most cards due to being so common, as well as being the best character in the game. Denying such is ignorance.
Oh God, no, just when I got Xyro to shut up about conspiracies. -_-
No, I have a "huge problem dealing with it" because you're being an IDIOT.
[/quote]
until the SBR is read-only to all members, conspiracy theories are allowed as you can withhold things in the SBR. I'll say this, Make the SBR read-only, and conspiracy theories disappear as they have no credit.
And be nice mate, you are not making yourself look like the 'almighty BRommer' that you should be. I will not cuss or insult you, but do the same in return, or is that too much to ask?
EDIT: xDD master is right, I do mention mostly the S and A tiers, but those are the ones that matter the most, it even says in the tier list topic that "Long story short, if the character is in S or A tier, order matters a lot. If the character is not, then unless it's at the top of the tier and another is at the bottom of the tier, there's not that huge of a difference." In its own way. For a tier to have such huge differences means that it is more important, as there will be more discussion on it.
I do not mention the C and lower tiers, as MK has good matchups vs all of those characters already, they just get screwed by other higher tiers.
I'll actually say... xDD master says my theory better then I do somewhat.
.