D
Deleted member
Guest
falco's been too good for 3 years now.falco too goodz....
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
falco's been too good for 3 years now.falco too goodz....
Why? Doc's MUs too bad or something?I'm gonna stick with Marth.
www.youtube.comMeh. Without Shroomed, idk where I'll find Doc vids to watch.
I was talking specifically about new vids. I should probably just look up old vids; I'm just used to only watching new vids 'cause of Starcraft, but SC has much bigger metagame shifts due to map rotations and balance patches and stuff.
Is it because of zhu?Yeah, that's exactly what happened Max. I've just been winning so long in Norcal that I became content and stopped actually trying to improve and it came back to bite me in the ***.
I get more joy out of this game from playing Marth though, which is the reason I'm switching. Not simply because Doc sucks. However, Doc sucking might be why he's less fun than Marth.
LOL nah.Is it because of zhu?
do you go to lawrencville?So I've been dabbling a lot with Doc lately and have found myself training with him more than Pika. The problem is if my two best characters are Doc and Pika, well, they don't really balance each other's weaknesses lol.
ah, alright.LOL nah.
It's just how I've been feeling which is why I've been going Marth so much/randomly.
Yeah, do you know the people I smash with or what?do you go to lawrencville?
I'm like "Because of Zhu? What's Unknown talking about?!"Is it because of zhu?
marth is w/eI could've done it with Marth I know it! I just choked it away.
I'm still torn between going full Marth or sticking with Doc. I'll probably wind up sticking with Doc.
I haven't research crouch-cancel stuff yet. I stopped having time to do research for this game sometime around late November 2011.How do you deal with C.Falcon approaching and zoning Doc out with Nairs? I've had a bit of success with random full-hop Nairs and capes, but they seem really punishable. Is there crouch-cancel stuff you can do or something?
Play it by ear.I could've done it with Marth I know it! I just choked it away.
I'm still torn between going full Marth or sticking with Doc. I'll probably wind up sticking with Doc.
Yes, run up and shield.Shield approach? like, just run up and shield? I don't think Doc can punish well-spaced Nairs OoS.
There are two types of Nairs that I'm having trouble with. One is just approaching Nairs, which I probably should be CCing and doing something, but I find that I usually get jabbed before I can do anything (probably just need to be faster). The other is stationary short-hop Nairs to zone me out, like when I'm at the edge and Falcon is doing sh Nairs in the center, just out of Doc's range. Sometimes I'm able to trade Ftilts or Utilts, but the trade doesn't seem worth it, especially when I get hit off the stage again.
I think using two characters is actually beneficial for a lot of people. Chaddd made a really good post about it and how it relates to counterpicking and stuff like that. I don't really feel like dredging through posts for it though.Play it by ear.
Your dilemma may even be a false dichotomy. For example you could just cut out the rest of your secondaries -- Sheik, Falcon, whoever else you might play when unmotivated/unchallenged -- and go Doc/Marth all the time. The best of both worlds.
I think once you've compartmentalized a significant amount of skill, using two characters is fine, maybe even preferable. But three-plus is when the risk/reward ratio becomes imba towards risk.
Yeah, but if you're at a wall, ime messing around with two-plus characters merely prolongs it.I think using two characters is actually beneficial for a lot of people. Chaddd made a really good post about it and how it relates to counterpicking and stuff like that. I don't really feel like dredging through posts for it though.
I'm curious; what is the gist of his reasoning? I was always under the impression that playing multiple characters usually caused each individual character to have less flexible playstyles.I think using two characters is actually beneficial for a lot of people. Chaddd made a really good post about it and how it relates to counterpicking and stuff like that. I don't really feel like dredging through posts for it though.
I used to main Falco and started using Doc. as a secondary. Then, I mained him, and got better at the game.Doc is mad good. About to add him to my rotation.