blackghost
Smash Champion
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2015
- Messages
- 2,249
the discussion of a ban does belong in this thread as the ban would be purely competitive in nature. but I find the idea of a ban ridiculous. i'm watching the hero games and some of these stronger spells show up maybe once or twice a set and often can't even be used for a variety of reasons. the smash community doesnt know what a real problem character is i agree with you. smash has never seen a war machine, red venom, mvc 3 phoenix, or sc4 hilde. most of the top tiers in the series history outside of brawl mk didnt have arguments for bans.I personally think that Smash players are far too quick to jump the gun on talk of bans, and even when something actually kind of problematic presents itself (like Brawl MK or Sm4sh Bayo) the community cannot universally agree on bans. Wobbling is still a controversy after almost 20 years of existence, and people can't unite on a position regarding it.
Smash players have also never seen a genuinely problematic character. Super Turbo Akuma and Alpha 3 Gill make MK and Bayo look like mid tiers.
I think arguments toward banning the Hero are silly (RNG in a character and RNG in a stage are two entirely different things.. banning based on RNG also is a slippery slope because then people are gonna start ******** about the other examples of character RNG because why pick favorites right?) and I also don't even see an actual ban coming to fruition, even in doubles.
This thread also probably isn't the ideal place to discuss why you think Leffen is right and The Hero should be banned.
banning a character becuase of something he COULD do is a bad precedent. keep in mind ultimate has genuine 0 to deaths already. it has inescapable shield break setups, and these characters always have access to them and arent on a resource. i genuinely believe if this character was not DLC i wouldn't hear a word about a ban.