:flame:
You and the SBR were able to sit down, and discuss the Metaknight issue like civilized beings. I've said this in the thread a few times (each time ignored, because we're all caught up in fighting), but what if we had the 3 sides talk about it in groups? Those that want the ban, those against it, and those with other solutions? We could be given a set amount of time to discuss different topics, and once we have fully thought out and backed information, the more sophistocated members of each group use all of the information gathered by said group in a true debate, allowing more people to learn about the nuances of this situation. After we learn about both (or all 3+) sides, the information can be summed up for each group, put at the very top of a new thread, and a vote amoungst a hopefully more intelligent popular can occur again, with more information backing up the thoughts besides "HE IS RIGGED! BAN HIM!" and "HE IS NOT RIGGED! DON'T BAN HIM!". I wonder if a post limit could possibly stop people who would just say stuff like that from voting as well, although spammers would still be able to do so...
Your thoughts, Sir? By the way, I've taken your advice as best as I could, going out to local tournaments, learning about my matchups and such, and getting online experience with other brawlers that I can't fight up close. I'm still no match for people of high calibur like you and Azen and M2K, but I feel I have improved greatly since the last time I talked to you. I'm a big boy now!
With Respect,
Da-D-Mon-109
:flame:
:flame: