Pluvia
Hates Semicolons<br>;
Vote: J
Pretty simple
Pretty simple
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I don't know what line you're referring to.appeal to emotion. I'll leave it to you to find out which line I'm referring to
Can you please add giving everyone a case/bulleted reasoning for why you feel I'm scum?
Also a JTB scum-read? Can you explain how you have that? And if John doesn't flip scum, what does it do to your other reads?
This is what I am talking about, Pluvia/Everyone.I'm sure I've posted like 3 posts as to why I think you're scum. JTB is just my other scum read for his play earlier.
To answer every question which goes "What if it turns out X wasn't what you thought they were" the answer is I'll cross that bridge if I come to it.
Anyway I'm done answering your questions, you're still trying to get me lynched because you're scum, I will answer questions if someone else asks it but I'm not letting you try and fool everyone into lynching me. You tried twisting people into thinking there was contradictions, and if I wasn't here like I was supposed to I wouldn't have been able to point out that there was no contradiction and it wasn't actually opportunistic, I said it 29 hours ago, it was actually the complete opposite.
For anyone wanting a free untwisted version: I think J is clearly scum, I've been pointing this out repeatedly, I really think we should lynch him over everyone else, but I'm not going to risk a no-lynch, that's what he wants.
John's play does seem like his normal scum play, Guus is right, but I've never seen his normal town play so I wouldn't say he's scum yet.
J's play just feels like he's constantly talking to someone else telling him how to play. "What are you doing Guus? Oh wait now I know. I daycopped you. Oh wait I never. You made a contradiction. Oh wait no my mistake."
Unvote
Vote: J
I switched my vote because no one else seems to be voting for you, and we need 5 to lynch, John is my most scummy read out of him and Doll so I passed my vote so we can get a lynch, rather than none.
What I would love is for you to be lynch but for reasons I'm not seeing people want John over you.
No I actually said this 29 hours ago:
I already explained why I now think John and J are scum buddies, that's what I've been doing for this past day, this jump to John is only opportunistic if you ignore all my posts to John in this past 24 hours, and John's response, or lack of, to be more precise.
But Pluvia, you keep changing what you are saying.
First you change your vote onto John because John+J = most likely scum-buddies in your mind.
Then you say if John flips town, you will be pushing J harder.
Where do you get this logic from?
The whole "I still think you're clearly scum" thing. As you can see I now think there's a chance he's your scum buddy.
The best thing I'd want is for you to be lynched because I still think you're clearly scum, but like I said I don't want to end this day without a lynch. I'm not voting for you because no one else is, and that would make my vote pointless and will risk a no-lynch.
John being town will just mean I'm wrong about him being your scum buddy, that doesn't mean you're not scum, hence why I'm going to push for you harder rather than risking another town lynch on someone like John when you're clearly scum.
You're trying to confuse people into thinking there's contradictions, as you can see there is none, it's just causing more scum reads from me.
I'm not concerned with what you say, I'm more concerned that no one else seems to be seeing your scummyness.
Notice this everyone? Notice how I pointed out that I've not been contradicting myself? Notice how he twice tried making it look like I was contradicting myself, and I pointed out that I was actually doing what I said I was going to do over a day before?Pluvia, I am not twisting anything at all nor do I get why you are choosing to ignore me and my questions because I am not doing half the things you are saying. You are saying I am twisting your actions to make you scummier when I am just questioning you because your behaviour is looking scummy and contradictory.
then f***ing do something. there are 2 scum in this game, not just 1han bored sitting around waiting for the inevitable.
This is vague, go over this again for me Pluvia.J's play just feels like he's constantly talking to someone else telling him how to play. "What are you doing Guus? Oh wait now I know. I daycopped you. Oh wait I never. You made a contradiction. Oh wait no my mistake."
*To Guus*
And what's stopping you from showing what you have on John?
Guus, why are you ignoring me? ;_;
*Nothing happens* There is a sudden change here like he talked to a scum partner.Why are more people not voting SW96 and in fact trying to start other wagons? Come on guys, the whistle's blowing for this bandwagon train to go through.
New bit:I didn't understand the Pluvia dummy or scummy thing till his very last post. I actually came in here to ask that but I got a response I wanted.
JTB, should be a short read compared to other games (lol). Gimme an opinion on Guus, Pluvia and John.
TPK, mind if I take the reigns a bit?
Unvote
Vote: Pluvia
An explanation J?
A daycop thing after that whole daycop debacle. An opportunistic attempt, but not a very well thought out one, to take advantage of the situation and get me lynched. I noticed this:Apologies. I view from my phone a lot and sometimes leave it on and it shows me viewing the thread.
I day-copped you wouldn't be a good enough answer would it?
Well for me, I don't see you looking for scum, Pluvia, instead I see you more looking for lynches which is scummy. You aren't really looking at intent for JTB nor giving him a fair chance once he came into the game. What makes you 100% certain that it isn't a gambit like RR said? I just feel that you are not looking at a broader scope of things and yes you may be asking questions but they seem disgenuine.
And then sudden backtracking pretending it was a joke, which might have worked before the whole daybop debacle not after it. Again, it was like he made a move without his scum partner and then was suddenly instructed to backpedal:Before I respond:
Does this mean you daycopped me?
Here's an attempt at making me look like I'm contradicting myself:Pluvia, that was my way of making a small joke. ^^"
I again point out it's not a contradiction:You contradict yourself here Pluvia. You say scum wouldn't put themselves into a position to set themselves up for a D2 lynch. However you say that if TPK is lying, he is scum. So can I ask which is it exactly?
He backpedals again as there's no way to twist it into making me look like I'm contradicting myself:That's not a contradiction, I explain why I believe he's telling the truth it the sentence before the one you bolded. Then I explain what happens if it turns out he's lying, and you bolded it.
Why do you believe that scum would set themselves up for a day 2 lynch?
Then the rest of his play has been scummy attempts at trying to make me look like I'm contradicting myself, and trying to avert attention to me.My bad on the grammar slip-up.
However, Pluvia, tell me. What if we were to lynch TPK toDay and he was to flip a role not scum and not Day-cop? What would that do for you in terms of reads?