Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I love the Mother series, but the idea of these three being together does nothing for me. I can't really bring myself not to see Ninten as proto-Ness, and to recognize that most of the design quirks that differentiate him are either super subtle or made up.When it comes to new Mother/Earthbound reps, I'm a heavy Ninten supporter. It would be really cool to have all three boys together.
There is quite a bit to make Ninten stand out from Ness. For one there's a lot of PSI moves that were only in the first game that did not return in the sequels, including 4th-D-Slip, PK Beam, and Brainshock, and PK Flash and PK Starstorm weren't in the first game at all. Notably, the first game didn't have yo-yos either. A YouTuber even made a moveset for him where they gave him a weapon for all his normals rather than just his Smash Attacks like the other PK boys do. I also want to see the first game get repped, because there's quite a bit of moveset potential there that isn't in the other two games.I love the Mother series, but the idea of these three being together does nothing for me. I can't really bring myself not to see Ninten as proto-Ness, and to recognize that most of the design quirks that differentiate him are either super subtle or made up.
Obviously if he's just an echo fighter or something it's whatever, he's not getting in the way of anyone else, but as far as idealistic next steps for the Mother series go the answer is obviously Porky to give both Ness and Lucas their rival. As far as lesser discussed options go though, Flint or Duster would be neat. I'm actually a little bummed Duster wasn't an AT like Jeff to round out the core Mother 3 crew since Kumatora and Boney appear in Lucas' Final Smash.
Although realistically, if anything, we're lucky if we even maintain Lucas next time around. We can dream I suppose.
My choice for a rep like that would be the manga version of Kirby seen here:If we get any character thats from a series represented in smash but debuted in a non video game adaptation of said series, it should be Mario-kun
The Bluster Kong in questionIf we get any character thats from a series represented in smash but debuted in a non video game adaptation of said series, it should be Mario-kun
I do think there’s some merit to adding some pretty ridiculous characters like Bluster Kong or like I dunno scratch and grounder because of the importance of memes but the manga version of mario’s definitely got like way more influenceThe Bluster Kong in question
Fair enough - I think Bluster would be a genuinely interesting moveset given his arrogance mixed with cowardice, but Mario-kun is pretty influential and could make for a fun moveset himself.I do think there’s some merit to adding some pretty ridiculous characters like Bluster Kong or like I dunno scratch and grounder because of the importance of memes but the manga version of mario’s definitely got like way more influence
Technically Lucario fits this bill. He debuted in a movie.If we get any character thats from a series represented in smash but debuted in a non video game adaptation of said series, it should be Mario-kun
Do commercials count? Because a lot of the weird 90s Nintendo commercials have an argument for their inclusion, at least from a strictly moveset perspective.If we get any character thats from a series represented in smash but debuted in a non video game adaptation of said series, it should be Mario-kun
but was made for a video gameTechnically Lucario fits this bill. He debuted in a movie.
To clarify my first post a little, if I had the choice between any character like I described I would probably choose someone like Bluster Kong or a commercial character (Wii Would Like to Play would probably be my first choice for that lol), or something similar because I think it would be fun to see them come back and there is some moveset potential. But most of that is just because I know there’s literally no chance they could be added otherwise, Mario-kun is the one I think is the most likely, has the biggest legacy, and I can justify the most in my mind and realistically he probably should be added over those others IMO.Do commercials count? Because a lot of the weird 90s Nintendo commercials have an argument for their inclusion, at least from a strictly moveset perspective.
Same should be said for Spirits, songs and Assist Trophies. There are a few examples in this regard but I think the base game of SSBU should’ve gone deeper in having non-playable content from the represented 3rd party companies.Smash is under no obligation to be a "Celebration of Gaming" but if that is a concept that it's sold on, then maybe more than fighters, there should be levels embodying that. There are loads incredibly famous titles all throughout the history of the hobby that could serve as great settings for levels. Famous non-Nintendo arcade releases alone could fill up a Smash stage selection.
For example, a stage representing Tetris.Famous non-Nintendo arcade releases alone could fill up a Smash stage selection.
Having them as a fighter would be interesting.Absolutely should be Space Invaders content of some sort-an AT?
Monster Hunter should have gotten more than just Rathalos, I really think a stage would have been great. Feel like that probably would have happened under less time constraints, since so much effort went into bringing back old stages vs developing new ones. Monster Hunter could be added as a fighter next game, but I think giving it the Brawl "Animal Crossing treatment" would suit it well enough.Same should be said for Spirits, songs and Assist Trophies. There are a few examples in this regard but I think the base game of SSBU should’ve gone deeper in having non-playable content from the represented 3rd party companies.
Do people outright dislike it? I just see it neglected in favor of Raven Beak usually, which I understand because Raven Beak's boss battle provides more explicit and obvious moveset potential. At face value, you look at the two and it's obvious who is easier to make a moveset out of.I dunno why people dislike EMMI as a pick so much, of all the "post-launch-Switch-game-for-the-sake-of-post-launch-Switch-game" picks, it's tied with Dragaux for the most interesting IMO.
More like picking Raven Beak over it.I dunno why people dislike EMMI as a pick so much
You know what, pretty clever of you, I commend you on that.everyone is here has already happened twice