Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I was thinking of doing a hall of fame or LEGENDS position. I wasn't sure how the current proposal would pass with you guys yet so I retracted my statement on Legends. It is similar to how people put "0." at the top of their power rankings.
Here it is:
LEGENDS - NOT LEGENDZ, THAT WEIRD PLOT-HOLE FILLED DIGIMON RIP OFF
"There are certain positions that are left to the greats, so not only do we have a Champion position, we have a Legend position, assosiated with those whose accomplishments could never be superceded unless something miraculous occurs. This award is given only to those who dedicated their time and patience to the game to such an extent maddening to those
of sound mind or even peace.
This award will surely go to players like M2K and his miraculous Meta knight, and Ally with his superb Snake. There will also be legends that necessarily didn't dominate the meta game for a long period of time, but fit the criteria because they SHAPED it, like Neo or something (this is all up to discussion fellas)
This makes it fair for more positions to be used in the Champ/Pro system by other players who are consistent and active and can't exactly measure up to these Legends in order TO be recognized.
Legends are seldom given. Not every character has a legend. By 2012, however, every character will have a legend. And all of your hardwork will have shaped it.
Legends are a position used to avoid uncertainty in comparing wins and losses constantly against players who have more than proven themselves worthy of highest ranking. They are also only given to people if no other has risen to such a degree of devotion like the individual. If no player meets the expectations, Legend position is forfeited for that character.
Granted, this is the only thing I could come up with for outliers like M2K and Ally. Who knows if we will ever get a legend for Mario. Or Jigglypuff. Stuff like that.
THIS IS A VERY SUBJECTIVE POSITION (lmao)... It really depends on if you guys want it in place in order to open up the possibility of this system being successful. Would it be FAIR to say M2K and Ally are legends? Is it FAIR to make that assumption? Remember, LEGEND DOES NOT NECESSARILY = OR IS NOT > CHAMPS... at any given time as far as skill goes.
I'll consolidate this a bit better later when I make a clear post later this week.
Can't be all legends.I'm sad I'm not the pikachu legend...
Jash and Hyro should be up there as well for TL tbh.Based on who revolutionized or inspired the way the character is played.
that's so stupid.I can honestly say that as soon as Krys took over this thread I have subscribed and actually read what people have to say. I guess it's more comforting to know that a familiar/skilled player is doing the rankings. Keep it up Krys! I like the idea of linking the players names and such. Also Y.b.M. for number 1 Kirby, when we get to that point... Swag....
If you're going to do it like that, I say you need to make more of a list than do it per character. List all the legends and put the character they're up there for and why next to each one.wait wait wait guys lmao
I already listed the criteria
You have to have put enough blood sweat and tears in the game and the metagame for your character. You don't neccessarily have to have OWNED everyone in bracket from time to time like Ally or M2K, but you should at least be
-REALLY EFFIN GOOD WITH YOUR CHARACTER
-Have seen at least one major tournament win (1st or 2nd), if not more depending on the character
-Have the full support of the character boards themselves (like, how much do the marths look up to Neo? Sorry I'm using him as an example)
The whole point of a Legends List is to avoid letting them take up open spots on the Pros/Champs list that could otherwise be filled by potential CHALLENGERS to the proverbial thrones. I mean, it ain't fair to compare pros to M2K in all honesty. Neither is it fair to compare Warios now to Fiction. see my drift? Legends don't neccessarily have to play the game anymore, but generally should be recognized for great deeds.
Legends isn't meant for just the best player.. Boss imo should still be a Pro/Champ. While Mario himself doesn't get a Legend . . . yet. That's my opinion.
Anyways, Contenders? I don't know about that one.
Co-signed. It looks fine just as it is right now.I'm not really feeling the "Legend" idea.
It's making the thread get too complicated, in my opinion.
Haha, Nearz don't trip. I was actually prepared for this attitude towards the thread, that's why giving it to someone in the BBR made sense to me. All Krys did was change the front page style, and pretty much stay active with updates. I planned on changing it, but I must admit it wouldn't have looked as cool as his. I do think it's crazy Y.b.M. said that though lolol.that's so stupid.
if you don't know the person you don't support them wtf?
Points have been taken. I just think it'd be funner and easier to maintain to have a sample rather than a skill ladder where everyone's skill is super hard to scrutinize at one point but really easy at another. The major point of it was to remove any major region bias.Just because my post is subjective doesn't mean that it doesn't make sense lol.
Pros/challengers would work but I think 1-5 would be simpler and easier to maintain.