Eon the Wolf
Smash Ace
But he can moan suggestively and introduce a new generation to BDSM.....Oh wait that doesn't help his argument....Oh well, too late!
---------
So you're saying...Sagat isn't at least a LITTLE too OP? He's like the MK of Street Fighter :/
EDIT: By that, I mean that he's not game breakingly OP (At least not in SF4/SSF4...I hear baaaad things bout SF2's Sagat...) but he has little to NO bad match ups, and quite a few that are a bit in his favor...Sounds a loooot more like meta knight. If 'priority' didnt affect so damn much in brawl, Meta knight wouldn't be so unreachingly high so to speak. If he had match ups more balanced than 55/45 or 60/40 as his lowest, same thing. Sagat? He's just a tad OP, but the real problem lies with how UP a lot of characters end up being in comparison to the 'best'.
edit: Sole - See, but if you actually enjoy abusing cheap tactics and characters for the sake of abusing them....Then you're playing fighters wrong. Go play CoD, I'm sure they'd love your willingness to abuse broken tactics.
Fighters shouldn't be a 'quick street' to winning via broken tactics and characters. It should be a genre where you fight people, and you GET BETTER. I personally believe, more than any other genre, you HAVE to ENJOY what you're doing in a fighter, or it's just not worth it :/. If you're taking the quick road n abusing **** to win a ton, either you just love winning for the sake of winning rather than earning it....or somehow you really just enjoy playing cheap things. *shrug*
Argent - Ouuuch :/....
---------
So you're saying...Sagat isn't at least a LITTLE too OP? He's like the MK of Street Fighter :/
EDIT: By that, I mean that he's not game breakingly OP (At least not in SF4/SSF4...I hear baaaad things bout SF2's Sagat...) but he has little to NO bad match ups, and quite a few that are a bit in his favor...Sounds a loooot more like meta knight. If 'priority' didnt affect so damn much in brawl, Meta knight wouldn't be so unreachingly high so to speak. If he had match ups more balanced than 55/45 or 60/40 as his lowest, same thing. Sagat? He's just a tad OP, but the real problem lies with how UP a lot of characters end up being in comparison to the 'best'.
edit: Sole - See, but if you actually enjoy abusing cheap tactics and characters for the sake of abusing them....Then you're playing fighters wrong. Go play CoD, I'm sure they'd love your willingness to abuse broken tactics.
Fighters shouldn't be a 'quick street' to winning via broken tactics and characters. It should be a genre where you fight people, and you GET BETTER. I personally believe, more than any other genre, you HAVE to ENJOY what you're doing in a fighter, or it's just not worth it :/. If you're taking the quick road n abusing **** to win a ton, either you just love winning for the sake of winning rather than earning it....or somehow you really just enjoy playing cheap things. *shrug*
Argent - Ouuuch :/....