So not voicing our opinion about a game that is flawed, and taking action to fix the problem is wrong? Correct me if I made the wrong assumption (I dislike it when I get the wrong idea from a post).What I meant is that it would be a confession that the game is poorly designed, which it is. To me if you have a game with a banned character, and people making hacks to remove aspects from the game(tripping), then that tells me before I even play the game that it must have been pretty poorly put together for the community to have to do such drastic things to fix it.
If what I said above IS the case, then the soft-ban of Old Sagat overseas is a message from the community over there, that says "We give up vs. Sagat"?
If getting rid of one to allow many others a chance to compete, I feel it's justified to get rid of that one, but that's my personal opinion.
I'm not really trying to side with "ban MK'. Infact, I could care less where he is placed after this is all over. I'm just saying, that we're making all of these assumptions and whatnot of what would happen to the community if he were to ban him or not.
The only real way to find out is to do what Niko is going to do.
btw, I wish him luck on that.
Soft-ban is the way to go, even though it probably won't change anything. The ones who want money will play MK, end of story.