Fallacy, it doesnt say if there is porn of it it exists : PErroneous.
Rule 34: If it exists, there is porn of it.
Santa porn exists
Ergo, Santa exists.
Checkmate, GG no re. Have a happy holiday, y'all. PND out.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Fallacy, it doesnt say if there is porn of it it exists : PErroneous.
Rule 34: If it exists, there is porn of it.
Santa porn exists
Ergo, Santa exists.
Checkmate, GG no re. Have a happy holiday, y'all. PND out.
NINTENDO SIIIIIXTY FOAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARmerry christmas,whats the best gift you guys have ever gotten for xmas?...mine is private =]
NINTENDO SIIIIIXTY FOAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR
caps
A new copy of melee. My old one broke in the summer.merry christmas,whats the best gift you guys have ever gotten for xmas?...mine is private =]
Money is the object, I don't ask for gifts. I got about $800 for Christmas this year. But I didn't get a gift.. At all.merry christmas,whats the best gift you guys have ever gotten for xmas?...mine is private =]
That's not how implications work. An implication is valid if the hypothesis is false.Erroneous.
Rule 34: If it exists, there is porn of it.
Santa porn exists
Ergo, Santa exists.
I was speaking along simple terms when I said "decent", I'm well aware of how good MDK was.At first it was the divorce, but then it was the fact that he didn't like brawl, end of story,
And Marik, I saw in one of your posts you saying MDK was decent, are you kidding me? he was a consistent top three player in our scene when he played and this was off practice once to twice a week alone, nothing else. He also single handedly made our scene a lot better. He's a legend in GTA smash.
Fallacy, it doesnt say if there is porn of it it exists : P
santa is dead.That's not how implications work. An implication is valid if the hypothesis is false.
If Rule 34 on Santa was the implication p-->q, where p is "santa exists" and q is "santa porn exists". Even if santa porn exists, the implication (rule 34) would be either be True--> True or False-->True, which are both still valid, so that doesn't prove or disprove santa's existence.
It's possible to have porn of things that do not exist. The only thing that would be "wrong" when talking about rule 34 would be if something existed but there was no porn of it.
yay discreet math
Yeaaaaaaaaaaaah!why Is That Man Putting Sunglasses On His Face, Where Hes Already Wearing Sunglasses
Thats Just Silly.
omg, I hate it when yall at UOIT talk math outside of math classThat's not how implications work. An implication is valid if the hypothesis is false.
If Rule 34 on Santa was the implication p-->q, where p is "santa exists" and q is "santa porn exists". Even if santa porn exists, the implication (rule 34) would be either be True--> True or False-->True, which are both still valid, so that doesn't prove or disprove santa's existence.
It's possible to have porn of things that do not exist. The only thing that would be "wrong" when talking about rule 34 would be if something existed but there was no porn of it.
yay discreet math
LOL, carter.after minus/fools/nickcams posts, i was about to say all this thread needs is a tinman post... rofl and thereis is... this thread delvers.
Now all i need to see is Nasir saying that he'll 3 stalk swordgard and i can die a happy man
fun times lol2 Steves.
I remember Sauga vs. Vaughan, Joe + Steve dittos.
There is only 1 Tinaye, which equally mattersthere is only one ambrose, and thats all that ****ing matters
Money isn't usually the issue. I usually have at least enough to get to tournaments. It's usually that I'm too busy.Leafy guess that means you can come to all the tournaments within the next couple months :D