Reviewers make mistakes, and some are biased. For all we know, someone liked the Wii better so they gave the Wii version a better grade. I'm not saying that DID happen, but it's theoretically possible. Also, did the same two people review the games? If not...there shouldn't even be a question there.
I just haven't even gotten an impression of why the Wii is better, except that it just IS. Depending, I MAY rent the Wii version. If I hear no compelling arguments otherwise, though, I'll get the 360 version.
Wha...are you talking about the sign with "S. Shadow" on it? That says
right, not
night. But I can definitely see how you'd see that.
Yeah, they CLEARLY knew. They'd have to be absolutely retarde...oh wait, this is Sega, they actually seem to be.
...But seriously. They'd have to be complete morons to not realize that WEREHOG...let's just stop there. WEREHOG. I remember when the screenshot of Sonic and a werewolf-looking Sonic first came out and we called him Werehog. I don't think that was even the official name at the time, I don't think there was one. Correct me if I'm wrong, though. I thought it was really funny how we called him that because it's such a ridiculous name, and then it actually ended up as his name.
Also, I played the demo. It was a lot of fun, actually. Short, but sweet. And I was expecting a Werehog stage to accompany it so I could get the full effect, but...there was none. Marketing strategy, anyone? They knew people would hate the Werehog stages so they didn't include one in the demo.
Now here's the BIG question; WHY?! If they KNEW people would like the daytime, but not nighttime, stages, why wouldn't they take the nighttime stages out? It's like they WANT to be ***holes.
I STILL enjoy Sonic '06 more than Secret Rings. FAR more. More than Shadow the Hedgehog too. That game gets more flames than just about any other (except for the cliched, ET and Superman 64). "At least it's not as bad as Sonic '06." is a phrase I hear/read far too often. It was a TON of fun on the first playthrough. On the first playthrough, I put it up with the Adventure games. In retrospect, it was not THAT good. However, I'd still put it above Heroes (and I liked Heroes -- not the BEST, but it was fun), as well as Shadow and Secret Rings. It was a little repetitive, I did not appreciate the Sonic/Selena relationship, and Sonic 'dying' was pretty corny. But overall, it was fun.
As for Rush>>>Rivals...I've never played either, but isn't Rivals a racing game? Also, simply from watching
Sonic Rivals in 2 minutes, I get the impression that the story SUCKS. An Eggman from the future turning people into cards? Lolwut? So I can safely say that I don't think it's just people being Nintendo fans.
Yeah. Or maybe they'll actually make a good game again!
...No, you're right. I don't really want the apocalypse.
Heh, I knew the concept was familiar...
You should try one, they're great. And if you want a game that will absolutely KILL you, get Devil May Cry 3 (the regular version, not the re-released one -- the special edition is easier). Such a hard game, but still awesome.