Tenki said:
I don't believe he's really better than SheikZelda or PT. Also, alot of Sonic's abilities are way too reliant on the player who plays him, which is good in a way, but it can make for inaccuracy issues if someone really amazing plays as Sonic.
The more i think about it, Sonic is probably more and more deserving of this placement.
My brother mains ganon and we both use cf quite a bit so the mixup there is interesting. there is no doubt in my mind that falcon is the worst in brawl. Everything falcon does, ganon does better minus recovering, but his weight can negate that, of course the risk of getting ganoncided exists. Its just the extent to which ganon can be gayed is what makes him worse. which is what annoys me A LOT about tiers.
Ganon has a few unwinnable matchups while falcons might as well be the same. against the majority of the cast however i feel I can accurately say that ganon performs far better than falcon. Take into account however the extent to which every character can % camp him an entire game if they choose to play gay and suddenly it gets a lot worse. So we have an example of a character getting sent to bottom tier because of this, while a the same time yo have a character like falco who gets hard countered by a few characters and is disadvantaged against most of top and even with high tier. Yet this seems to have no effect on his placement.
The tier list becomes more and more obvious that its simply a rating of how the characters perform in tournaments, paper statistics seem to have lost all meaning anymore, and matchups are witnessed first hand to be closer than most think. The ability for players to abuse certain tactics to even out matchups has to be considered. In contradiction to what you stated Tenki, I dont believe Brawl's tiers should not be affected by mindgames etc. Sonics ability to mindgame and whatnot is the same player-dependant skill to simply run away from ganon for 7 minutes and simply wait for him to approach, very much the reason he is dead last. How are Sonic's mindgames worthless in tiers while MK's ability to up-b oos vs everything you throw at him warrants top tier? they both rely on the player, and to the degree they can abuse tactics for a real result
Which brings me to Sonic. for so long we have said he cant be anything other than low tier (ROY, quit swf yet? lol or was that only for 2.0
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4549/b4549efa6954b46e3ec2fcf09ea12c66d23bf95a" alt="Stick Out Tongue :p :p"
) because he sucked on paper which was fair enough, but no other character gets the same treatment. Other fighting games may base their tier lists on matchups, attack ratings etc but you cant compare brawl to them. the brawl tier list is very different from other game's lists and I beleive less accurate for it. The final result of all this, Sonic being higher than sheik. Why should sheik be higher? (or bowser, ike for that matter). Being good on paper is not a consideration in brawl tier lists. Sheik has done nothing to prove her tournament viability being greater than Sonics If those characters were to be higher, the entire brawl tier list would be completely thrown out of balance. DK would be high/top tier (and rightfully so) and DDD's victims would rise. Not that it makes a difference in the end, they will still get gayed by him.
tl;dr In any other game, Sonic would be low or bottom tier. In BRAWL, Sonic deserves to be higher than sheik 100% and is exactly where he should be. Brawl's tier list determining system is not wrong, its just different. and maybe the reason we think it is innacurate is because it is an uncommon method we are not used to, but who can honestly say it is wrong...